Jump to content

Mahatma Gandhi


84_Survivor
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Gandhi was a devout hindu...that is true. But that is a man's personal belief how he wants to believe his religion/way of life !

What is significant about Gandhi is that he had to do what he did from scratch. He wasn't perfect.

Think about it this way, unlike today's he had no govt to support him, no outside power to back him up..whatever plans and work he had to do he had to devise and act by himself.

The British were using very clever methods to keep India divided,

In Jalianwala Bagh, the Baloch Regiment (consisting of Punjabi Muslims) and Gurkha Regiment (Nepalis) were used to fire at innocent sikh pilgrims who were camping at JB.

In NWFP, the British used Sikh soldiers to tame the unruly Pathans.

In Northern UP & Bihar, the British used Punjabi Musalman to fire upon hindus and control any riots/mobs and also to take revenge when 1857 mutiny. After 1857 mutiny, the British sought replacements from South East Asia and China and when the replacements arrived, they just went haywire and used to hunt down the *natives* by some method called *Peppering the nigger*. THey used to burn down camps which lay in their way and when the people in the camp used to run out everyone used to be shot. pray.gif

This method of using one community against other went on and thus there was no united voice to stand up against the British. And then British used to crow about how they were such a superior & benevolent civilization out ot *save the natives*.

Gandhi then decided that non-violence could be used to shame the British conscience (ofcourse he knew that they had to had pride in themselves and were proud of their conscience, though selective). This method ofcourse would not have worked out against the Islamists or Muslims because they knew not what having a conscience meant. It was a policy of horses for courses. He had to find a way to unite the nation and thus he appealed to the muslim community to join his non-violent movement. The foremost adherant to his philosophy was a certain Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan a.k.a Bacha Khan a.k.a Frontier Gandhi. He also had Maulana Abdul Azad who was an Afridi Pathan from U.P and he gathered many muslim leaders by his side.

It was only then that a semblance of unity between the communities of North India was created, they were busy fighting among themselves and were being used by the British beforehand.

Gandhi's moves slowly began to be paid off, as British found that their Indian Army and recruits were not as motivated or enthusiastic as before. Gandhi gave a face to their aspirations and a leadership to a movement.

Needless to say, those were very tough times.

British kept on adding fuel to fire and wanted the communities to remain divided to serve their ends, but Gandhi devised particular plans just for the British and he committed himself to carrying out his plan.

It is easy for people today to sit on an easychair or in front of a computer and just berate him for various sins. He was post-modern India's first national icon. He used to confidently walk into any locality and community he liked and there used to be peace.

People used to have massive respect for him. And he used that respect to gain their confidence. It is sad that he couldn't manage to get the confidence of the Sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess i have a opinion .

No Gandhi would have been born if the

" SIKHS DID NOT LOOSE THE ANGLO- SIKH WAR "

Due to the typical trait of infighting we have amongst us like :=

1 ) Punjabi vs non Punjabi

2 ) Sikhs vs non Sikh

3 ) Jatts vs Chamar vs Brahmins vs baniya vs bappa vs bihari

but I guess this is also our strength having all shades of people and opinion ???

The day we stand united with what ever nation we belong to ; India / UK / Canada /Italy /USA /Pakistan etc ;

looser party leaders like Gandhi will not be born and shall not lead us into ignonimity.

Now how u fullfil the the saying of

" Nische kar apni jeet karu " is for u to decide.

love

hps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess i have a opinion .

No Gandhi would have been born if the

" SIKHS DID NOT LOOSE THE ANGLO- SIKH WAR "

Due to the typical trait of infighting we have amongst us like :=

1 ) Punjabi vs non Punjabi

2 ) Sikhs vs non Sikh

3 ) Jatts vs Chamar vs Brahmins vs baniya vs bappa vs bihari

but I guess this is also our strength having all shades of people and opinion ???

The day we stand united with what ever nation we belong to ; India / UK / Canada /Italy /USA /Pakistan etc ;

looser party leaders like Gandhi will not be born and shall not lead us into ignonimity.

Now how u fullfil the the saying of

" Nische kar apni jeet karu " is for u to decide.

love

hps

Well, i can the same thing in reverse and say there would be no Sikhism if guru Nanak wasn't born. That's not the point, the point is that Because of Gandhi you can call yourself Indian not because of bhagat Singh(even though he shouldn't be called a singh).

also, this isn't about wining or losing, i don't know hwere you got that idea from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use