Jump to content

It Guru Ji's Bana Not Nihang Bana!


Recommended Posts

they both the samething as the tenth guru was a nihang so it is a nihang bana and it is guru's bana what a stupid tread! By the way i havent bothered to read any previous reply to this just thought i would put my 2p worth in!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't use the amritworld site as being totally right, the views are biased.

I also found this on the sarbloh site lol (from the Akali Nihangs section under sanatan sikhs)

I have censored out parts that would be offensive to this website lol :

The Sanatan Sikhs - The Akali Nihang Singh Khalsa

Page 4 of 4

Nangs cont'd

A further issue that has to be highlighted is that ALL those Sikhs who are not Nihangs by action, tradition, attitude or the wisdom they possess, but, instead dress up as Nihangs to mislead people are also considered Nangs.

Many such fakes now exist and have convinced people they are Nihang Singhs. However, they are but fools, deceiving themselves, and those around them.

There are also many man-made personality cults such as the (censored), self-proclaimed Sants (saints), and their followers, that have adopted the Akali Nihang Singh uniform and (wrongly) claimed it as their own. This is a feeble attempt to appeal to people to gain new recruits. They in the most part do not even understand the origins of the uniform let alone its significance.

Some such groups have even accused the Akali Nihang Khalsa of not being true to history in order to keep the limelight away from their own hypocrisy and cult status.

Even many militant, fundamentalist, fanatic groups that have nothing to do with the Sanatan Akali Nihang Singh Khalsa, such as the (censored) who are the militant wing of the (censored), have also adopted this same image of the Akali Nihang Singh Khalsa. The followers of such movements are frequently depicted adorning the Akali Nihang uniform.

These same individuals insult and ridicule the very knowledge that brings about the uniform, heritage and traditions themselves. This section has caused an uproar from the groups guilty of being Nangs. However, this is inevitable as the truth will only hurt those individuals who are living a life entwined with hypocrisy, lies and confusion.

In the eyes of the Sanatan Sikhs, and especially the Akali Nihang Singh Khalsa, these people are in fact seen as even lower than Nangs, as they insult the very wisdom itself.

These personality cults, and self-proclaimed Sants are now sadly gaining the most members, both in India, and around the world under various names and guises.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guru Gobind Singh ji was an Akali NIHANG

Can i have proof that Guroo Gobind Singh Jee was a Nihung ie written accounts of the time of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720) that actually refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung or give Guroo Jee the title Akali

Nihungs also refer to Guroo Nanak Dev Jee as 'Akali'...does this mean that Guroo Nanak Dev Jee is a Nihung too?

anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guru Gobind Singh ji was an Akali NIHANG

Can i have proof that Guroo Gobind Singh Jee was a Nihung ie written accounts of the time of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720) that actually refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung or give Guroo Jee the title Akali

Nihungs also refer to Guroo Nanak Dev Jee as 'Akali'...does this mean that Guroo Nanak Dev Jee is a Nihung too?

anyone?

guru gobind singh ji used nihang in at two places in sri dasam granth 1 in chandi di war for the army of durga other in bachiter natak hussanis battle where he called his fauj as nihangs ... and nihang for guru gobind singh is used not in one but many granths such as gurubilas patshahi 10 where its clearly said about ponta sahibs jung that nihang leading nihangs ie guru gobind singh ji leading his fauj !!!

and akali word came into being officially for guru sahiban and his fauj ever since akal bunga was made ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guru Gobind Singh ji was an Akali NIHANG

Can i have proof that Guroo Gobind Singh Jee was a Nihung ie written accounts of the time of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720) that actually refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung or give Guroo Jee the title Akali

Nihungs also refer to Guroo Nanak Dev Jee as 'Akali'...does this mean that Guroo Nanak Dev Jee is a Nihung too?

anyone?

guru gobind singh ji used nihang in at two places in sri dasam granth 1 in chandi di war for the army of durga other in bachiter natak hussanis battle where he called his fauj as nihangs ... and nihang for guru gobind singh is used not in one but many granths such as gurubilas patshahi 10 where its clearly said about ponta sahibs jung that nihang leading nihangs ie guru gobind singh ji leading his fauj !!!

and akali word came into being officially for guru sahiban and his fauj ever since akal bunga was made ...

Other than Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Jee (where you state Guroo Jee is not referring to himself) are any of these accounts, that do refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung of the time period of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guru Gobind Singh ji was an Akali NIHANG

Can i have proof that Guroo Gobind Singh Jee was a Nihung ie written accounts of the time of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720) that actually refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung or give Guroo Jee the title Akali

Nihungs also refer to Guroo Nanak Dev Jee as 'Akali'...does this mean that Guroo Nanak Dev Jee is a Nihung too?

anyone?

guru gobind singh ji used nihang in at two places in sri dasam granth 1 in chandi di war for the army of durga other in bachiter natak hussanis battle where he called his fauj as nihangs ... and nihang for guru gobind singh is used not in one but many granths such as gurubilas patshahi 10 where its clearly said about ponta sahibs jung that nihang leading nihangs ie guru gobind singh ji leading his fauj !!!

and akali word came into being officially for guru sahiban and his fauj ever since akal bunga was made ...

Other than Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Jee (where you state Guroo Jee is not referring to himself) are any of these accounts, that do refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung of the time period of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720)?

no replies?

am i to assume that there is no evidence to prove that Guroo was a Nihung?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use