Jump to content

The origin of 5 Kakaars


Recommended Posts

Keeping unshorn hair is natural when following Hukam, this has been the case since the origin of humans. The remaining four kakkars are spiritual tools given by the Guru ji. They may have been around in some shape or form in the past, that is irrelevant, nobody has a franchise or copyright on the kacchera.

The desperate person or one with an agenda will try to link it with this or that in history. The history prior to Guru ji formalising their status for his disciple, is irrelevant. Kakkars act as practical spiritual tools, that is all one needs to know. Indeed if you don't know why your are wearing your kakkars, that is a cause for concern ( hopefully none of us are wearing them blindly, they become rituals in that case).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bhai Sahib Bhai Randhir Singh Jee has done the arths of this tukh as follows:

ਰੰਗੁ ਨ ਲਗੀ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਤਾ ਸਰਪਰ ਨਰਕੇ ਜਾਇ ॥੫॥

This is metaphor if i am not wrong :biggrin2:

ਚਿਤਿ ਨ ਆਇਓ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਤਾ ਸਰਪ ਕੀ ਜੂਨਿ ਗਇਆ ॥੬॥

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is metaphor if i am not wrong :biggrin2:

ਚਿਤਿ ਨ ਆਇਓ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਤਾ ਸਰਪ ਕੀ ਜੂਨਿ ਗਇਆ ॥੬॥

Yes !!

This shabad points to all the suffering and pain that one experiences in this lifetime.

This shabad is given as a reference to when people ask Guruji.... WHY and WHAT can I do to get away from all this DUKH and suffering with pain,tragedy, depression..etc...???

See full shabad on ANG 70 to confirm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes !!

This shabad points to all the suffering and pain that one experiences in this lifetime.

This shabad is given as a reference to when people ask Guruji.... WHY and WHAT can I do to get away from all this DUKH and suffering with pain,tragedy, depression..etc...???

See full shabad on ANG 70 to confirm.

I know its on pg 70 when I posted tuks of shabad I posted with pg number :biggrin2: and my view is narak and sarap are metaphor in these tuks. Can't argue if antbody differ :biggrin2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know its on pg 70 when I posted tuks of shabad I posted with pg number :biggrin2: and my view is narak and sarap are metaphor in these tuks. Can't argue if antbody differ :biggrin2:

I agree with your point, but I was telling others to confirm by seeing ang70 if they need.

:biggrin2: :lol2:

The eternal hell is abrahamic. If you do paap and sin like crazy, then you will suffer here and there and it is very unlikely you will attain mukhti :nono: :angry2:

But you won't go to an eternal hell as such but you will go through the 84 lak joon to endure some good old pain and suffering! :omg:

But then Waheguru STILL gives you a chance as a human to cleanse your bad karma and attain jivan mukhti/ be gurmukh !!

So we should consider ourselves lucky to be NOT in an eternal hell.

The ONLY thing ETERNAL in Sikhi is after you merge with God and Akaal Purakh himself - everything else is NOT eternal. :strong:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with your point, but I was telling others to confirm by seeing ang70 if they need.

:biggrin2: :lol2:

The eternal hell is abrahamic. If you do paap and sin like crazy, then you will suffer here and there and it is very unlikely you will attain mukhti :nono: :angry2:

But you won't go to an eternal hell as such but you will go through the 84 lak joon to endure some good old pain and suffering! :omg:

But then Waheguru STILL gives you a chance as a human to cleanse your bad karma and attain jivan mukhti/ be gurmukh !!

So we should consider ourselves lucky to be NOT in an eternal hell.

The ONLY thing ETERNAL in Sikhi is after you merge with God and Akaal Purakh himself - everything else is NOT eternal. :strong:

I don't think you understand the concept of Nark in Indic religions. sadly this is what I see in the west. Some people think hell is only an abrahamic concept. The difference between hell in Abrahamic and Indic faiths is that in Abrahamic faiths it is eternal damnation since they don't believe in reincarnation. In Indic religions, hell is a temporary place where a sinful soul will get it's punishment before reincarnating.

In the Hindu faith, you have the famous story of the Saintly Raja Janak going to hell and because of his immense Bhagti he was able to empty hell of all it's suffering souls. Buddhist and Jain scriptures are also replete with detailed references to Nark and the punishments the jeev gets for sins before reincarnating. So I don't understand where you and Gurdeep Singh Johal Jee are getting your knowledge of Indic religions.

You should first study about a subject before making statements that have no bases and in the process also misinterpreting Gurbani. One must adjust their thinking to Gurbani instead of making Gurbani adjust to their thinking. If Gurbani is saying one thing it is our Farz to believe it instead of saying 'well this tukh does not agree with my thinking so I will say this tukh is metaphorical'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gurdeep ji, do you see maharaj jj Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji as your living guru? You keep saying pg rather than ang despite hints from members..,.. Waheguru

Guru Granth Sahib is our Guru no doubt, but it has pages not body parts. If you want to show respect then you have to live life according to gurmat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use