Jump to content

is dhunda doing katha in delhi gurudwara anymore?


Pappi9
 Share

Recommended Posts

UK = Paji you know full well that only parts of Charitropakhiyan and the Kul-mentioning parts of Bachittar Natak which reference Ram Chander as a so-called ancestor of the Sodhi's are what many many GurSikhs dispute so there is no relavance to you quoting parts of Bani that I also have reverence for.

Only missionaries as they have not read Dasam Granth sahib. In bachitra natak Guru ji does not lay importance on his ancestry but compares offspring of king ram chander who fight for material possessions and are finished in the end to house of Guru Nanak which believes in Naam of God and still flourishes.It is all written there.Read it before indulging in false propaganda here.

Guru Granth says

Bhale amardas Gunn tere, Does it mean there is emphasis on kul. Guru Ramdass ji is mentioned as Sodhi in Guru Granth sahib. So stop forwarding false stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's fine Paji if you have proof that you wish to present that allows you to state with unwavering confidence that Dhan Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj had a previous life then bring it all to the table. Who knows you might even convert someone skeptical myself to your point of view. Bring your proof. It's worth mentioning that the only proof a Sikh should accept is Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj

I'm glad you clear up the misconception that certain folks who believe in Charitropakhiyan may have had regarding Guru Sahib's alleged age.

When I mentioned people like yourself I was referring to Waljinder Singh's mention on the thread:

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/71322-previous-birth-of-guru-sahib-ji/page-3

At the age of 30 my belief is that Dhan Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj was busy defending Sri Anandpur Sahib and fighting for Sarbat da Bhala

... rather than writing the sexual tales you GPS Paji believe that he had the time to author at that point in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's fine Paji if you have proof that you wish to present that allows you to state with unwavering confidence that Dhan Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj had a previous life then bring it all to the table. Who knows you might even convert someone skeptical myself to your point of view. Bring your proof. It's worth mentioning that the only proof a Sikh should accept is Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj

I'm glad you clear up the misconception that certain folks who believe in Charitropakhiyan may have had regarding Guru Sahib's alleged age.

When I mentioned people like yourself I was referring to Waljinder Singh's mention on the thread:

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/71322-previous-birth-of-guru-sahib-ji/page-3

At the age of 30 my belief is that Dhan Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj was busy defending Sri Anandpur Sahib and fighting for Sarbat da Bhala

... rather than writing the sexual tales you GPS Paji believe that he had the time to author at that point in time.

Do not see the proof? Proof is Dasam Granth sahib. he did not write he had previous life. He wrote he was meditating at hem kunt sahib. He does not write in what form he was meditating.These are domains of Godly acts and do not interpret per your limited understanding.

How old are you UKlondonsikh ji? I think we are having discussion with a child. Pl note that Khalsa was created in 1699 AD and battle of Anandpur occurred after that.Read some sikh history before you write blasphemy here and violate guidelines of the forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UKLondonSikh, thanks for being respectful and not making personal attacks, however, this doesn't mean you can question legitimacy of Sikh scriptures on the forums. This is a formal warning that any posts questioning Dasam Granth Sahib will be deleted and action will be taken by admins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GPS = Do not see the proof? Proof is Dasam Granth sahib.

UK = The only proof acceptable to a Gursikh is Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj

GPS = He wrote he was meditating at hem kunt sahib. He does not write in what form he was meditating.

UK = I will reserve my faith for Dhan Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj rather than what you allege Paji

GPS = How old are you UKlondonsikh ji? I think we are having discussion with a child. Pl note that Khalsa was created in 1699 AD and battle of Anandpur occurred after that.

UK = That means Paji you are unaware of Dilawar Khan and his son's attack on Anandpur Sahib at the age you allege Guru Sahib wrote Charitropakhiyan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok Mod Paji i will leave it at that for now and hopefully me and GPS Paji can find something where we agree like the Manjinder Singh Sirsa thread:

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/71437-manjinder-singh-sirsa-appeals-to-sikh-sangat-in-india-to-take-a-stand/



GPS Paji let's me and you draw a line from today on debating contentious issues from now on

... and focus on the issues where we are in overall agreement for the Panth's Chardi Kallah.

VJKK VJKF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UK = The only proof acceptable to a Gursikh is Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj

In guru Granth sahib is not written why a sikh should take baptism or Amrit. Is it written there how khalsa is created? Is it written there why you should have singh as last name.If so show us.

Sikhi comprises our scripures, history and tradition. Only sahib Guru Granth is not sikhi.Like that thousands of sindhis believe in SGGS ji but do not believe in institution of khalsa.They cut hair and smoke. Will you call them sikhs? This is what missionaries want us to take.

UK = That means Paji you are unaware of Dilawar Khan's attack on Ananpur Sahib at the age you allege Guru Sahib wrote Charitropakhiyan

GPS :Please do not talk in riddles.Tell us what you want to say.Are you saying that battle of Anandpur started before 1699?

This is what you wrote earlier

At the age of 30 my belief is that Dhan Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj was busy defending Sri Anandpur Sahib and fighting for Sarbat da Bhala

unquote

He completed krishna avtar just when battle of Bhangani was to be fought. Guru is capable of doing anything and everything.

Ok Mod Paji i will leave it at that for now and hopefully me and GPS Paji can find something where we agree like the Manjinder Singh Sirsa thread:

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/71437-manjinder-singh-sirsa-appeals-to-sikh-sangat-in-india-to-take-a-stand/

GPS Paji let's me and you draw a line from today on debating contentious issues from now on

... and focus on the issues where we are in overall agreement for the Panth's Chardi Kallah.

VJKK VJKF

Let me tell you one thing loud and clear. There is no panth without Dasam Granth sahib.It is Dasam Granth that makes panth.It is not panth it is called Guru Panth. We have two gurus Guru Granth and Guru panth.Read sikh rehat maryada first.

You greet here waheguru ji ki fateh so proudly.Remember that originates from Dasam Granth sahib only. People like you even do not know that every composition of Dasam granth starts with.

Ik onkar sri waheguru ji ki fateh.

That decimates all detractors of dasam bani.Your argument is he said so i said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GPS = In guru Granth sahib is not written why a sikh should take baptism or Amrit. Is it written there how khalsa is created? Is it written there why you should have singh as last name.If so show us.

UK = However, there is no controversy within the Panth as to Dhan Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj creating the Khalsa Panth

GPS = sahib Guru Granth is not sikhi. Like that thousands of sindhis believe in SGGS ji but do not believe in institution of khalsa.They cut hair and smoke. Will you call them sikhs? This is what missionaries want us to take.

UK = Paji i 100% believe that all non-Muslim Sindhi's are indeed Sikhs. They might be Sehajdhari but I wholly accept them as Sikhs within a larger and united Panth

UK = That means Paji you are unaware of Dilawar Khan's attack on Ananpur Sahib at the age you allege Guru Sahib wrote Charitropakhiyan

GPS :Please do not talk in riddles.Tell us what you want to say.Are you saying that battle of Anandpur started before 1699?

UK = Paji you should know that Anandpur Sahib was attacked more than once - just like Sri Harmandir Sahib.

This is what you wrote earlier

UK = At the age of 30 my belief is that Dhan Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj was busy defending Sri Anandpur Sahib and fighting for Sarbat da Bhala

unquote

GPS = Let me tell you one thing loud and clear. There is no panth without Dasam Granth sahib.It is Dasam Granth that makes panth.

UK = I believe that that the Sikh Panth is unstoppable, fundamentally undefeateable (if we have ekta) and can never be threatened by obliteration by any human force on this planet. I believe it is Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj that makes the Panth. Not a single Sikh on the planet disagrees with:

UK = VAHEGURU JI KA KHALSA! VAHEGURU JI KI FATEH!

UK = So on that note, I will try to refrain from adding to the contentious part of this thread but feel free on pm GPS Paji as Unity must come first and you know that I respect you as a fellow brother in the Panth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use