Jump to content

Communal Riots Break Out In North India


lsingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Were jatts apney? I mean, were they Sikh or Hindus?

In your anger, don't do injustice.

Rohiygnas are being persecuted, oppressed, and killed by Burmese for decades now. They don't have a right to citizenship, they live in slums, and they don't get jobs, social services from the government. They are seen as "outsiders" even though they have been living there for god knows when!

Buddhist mobs will lynch innocent Muslims on rumors of "Oh, one of them raped one woman? Lets burn their entire village"....

Didn't Muhammad bin Qasim raided india with same pretex? Oppression and injustice is ungodly, whether done by Muslims against Hindus..or whether its done by Buddhists against Rohiygna Muslims

NO you are wrong. The Rohingyas commit rape and crime and are intent on destroying Buddhism in Burma. I fully support the slaughter of Rohingyas by normally peaceful Buddhists, who have been driven to the limit by Islamic rape.

But please answer one very simple question, and this answer should put an end to this whole debate:

WHY EVERYWHERE in world.. SAME PROBLEM with ISLAM.

Whether it is Israel, India, UK, Burma, Russia, America .... whether w/ Sikhs, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists ALWAYS the SAME issues with Islam.

ANOTHER Point: Why so much RAPE with Islam? Yes there are rapes in India also not involving Muslims, but it is DISPROPORTINATELY Muslim.

Love Jihad in India. Sikh grooming in UK. White European girls in Europe. ALWAYS rape rape rape with these Muslims.

May I state one more thing? Highly politically incorrect but we should be honest on these forums. It IS the religion that is at fault.

Is anyone foolish enough to believe there is ZERO correlation between the fact that MUHAMMAD is their main revered prophet, a man who at age 55 raped a 9 yr old.

Let us not allow political correctness to corrode our brains like the Western media. Let's speak the truth. FACT: Muhammad was a child rapist. FACT Muslims are COMPELLED to revere this man and consider him perfect and FACT there is overwhelming evidence of excessive disproportionately high rape and child sexual abuse among Muslims.

Are we really NOT going to connect these dots? REALLY? Are we THAT politically correct and fearful?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were jatts apney? I mean, were they Sikh or Hindus?

In your anger, don't do injustice.

Rohiygnas are being persecuted, oppressed, and killed by Burmese for decades now. They don't have a right to citizenship, they live in slums, and they don't get jobs, social services from the government. They are seen as "outsiders" even though they have been living there for god knows when!

Buddhist mobs will lynch innocent Muslims on rumors of "Oh, one of them raped one woman? Lets burn their entire village"....

Didn't Muhammad bin Qasim raided india with same pretex? Oppression and injustice is ungodly, whether done by Muslims against Hindus..or whether its done by Buddhists against Rohiygna Muslims

The Rohangyas are Bengali Muslims who were brought to Burma by the British. They are not indigenous to Burma and that is the reason that they do not get given citizenship. The Bangladeshis have a plan for greater Bangladesh for decades which entails pushing out their excess population into NE India and Burma and then once they become a majority then Bangladesh will claim that area. The Burmese know this and that is why they are intent on kicking all the Rohangyas out of Burma. The Bangladeshi do not accept Rohangya refugees because to them accepting them will put the brakes on their greater Bangladesh scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rohangyas are Bengali Muslims who were brought to Burma by the British. They are not indigenous to Burma and that is the reason that they do not get given citizenship. The Bangladeshis have a plan for greater Bangladesh for decades which entails pushing out their excess population into NE India and Burma and then once they become a majority then Bangladesh will claim that area. The Burmese know this and that is why they are intent on kicking all the Rohangyas out of Burma. The Bangladeshi do not accept Rohangya refugees because to them accepting them will put the brakes on their greater Bangladesh scheme.

Good point. You would think Bangladeshis would be eternally grateful to India for saving them from genocide and making their country independent. But no! they have the audacity to cast an evil eye at their neighbor and have dreams of annexing west Bengal and parts of Assam to Bangladesh. Parts of Assam that these Bangladeshi nationalists are claiming was never historical Bengali inhabited land. The Bangladeshis are recent migrants to Assam and now have designs to make it part of Bangladesh. The indigenous people of Assam know this which is why they carry out a militant movement in Assam and even riot every once in a while to push out the Bangladeshi Muslims.

It's unfortunate what is happening to the Rohingyas. But truth be told, they are also in reality Bangladeshis who have migrated there over the last century. The Buddhists know that Muslims are only peaceful if they are a small minority but once they reach a certain percentage their demands increase, and if those demands are not met then they start a separatist movement which is actually what happened in Muslim majority area of Burma. What I find sad is that the poor Rohingya are suffering and boat loads want to move back to Bangladesh. But Bangladesh rejects them every time sending them back to the people who kicked them out in the first place. The Burmese should use more peaceful ways to solve their problem instead of inflicting suffering.

Perhaps India should learn a lesson from Bangladesh in regards to rejecting migrants send back the Bangladeshi migrants because Bangladeshi migrants are significantly changing the demographic landscape of North east India. Assamis are already up in arms in regards to this change in demographics and it's just a matter of time before riots also break out in Bengal if Hindus are strong willed enough to to protect their dominance in Bangal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would think Bangladeshis would be eternally grateful to India for saving them from genocide and making their country independent. But no!

That equates them with Indian attitude towards Sikhs!

Muslims are only peaceful if they are a small minority but once they reach a certain percentage...

One of my friends says its 40%, in fact, its become such a joke among us that each time we have to talk about Muslims or Islam, we use "forty percent" to refer to it, LOL.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NO you are wrong. The Rohingyas commit rape and crime and are intent on destroying Buddhism in Burma. I fully support the slaughter of Rohingyas by normally peaceful Buddhists, who have been driven to the limit by Islamic rape.

But please answer one very simple question, and this answer should put an end to this whole debate:

WHY EVERYWHERE in world.. SAME PROBLEM with ISLAM.

Whether it is Israel, India, UK, Burma, Russia, America .... whether w/ Sikhs, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists ALWAYS the SAME issues with Islam.

ANOTHER Point: Why so much RAPE with Islam? Yes there are rapes in India also not involving Muslims, but it is DISPROPORTINATELY Muslim.

Love Jihad in India. Sikh grooming in UK. White European girls in Europe. ALWAYS rape rape rape with these Muslims.

May I state one more thing? Highly politically incorrect but we should be honest on these forums. It IS the religion that is at fault.

Is anyone foolish enough to believe there is ZERO correlation between the fact that MUHAMMAD is their main revered prophet, a man who at age 55 raped a 9 yr old.

Let us not allow political correctness to corrode our brains like the Western media. Let's speak the truth. FACT: Muhammad was a child rapist. FACT Muslims are COMPELLED to revere this man and consider him perfect and FACT there is overwhelming evidence of excessive disproportionately high rape and child sexual abuse among Muslims.

Are we really NOT going to connect these dots? REALLY? Are we THAT politically correct and fearful?

You are utterly bias and have khrod against Muslims/Islam...A "FACT"

You reasoning and justifications are same to other anti-Islamic bigots that get influenced by Christian missionaries and spew hatred against Muslims...

Muslims have a problem? Yes.

But should we just become retarded hate-mongers, Muslim bashers because of it? And even justify Rohingyna's murder, rape etc? How pathetic.

There are alot of justifications that can be given for Mughal's slaughtering of early Sikhs/Sikh Gurus....You see, "justifying" the blatant wrong thing isn't that hard. Anyone can do it and call it a "fact"....

Lastly, I don't want to comment on Muhammad...As a sikh, I would rather care about Sikh gurus than spewing hatred for the religious figures of others...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rohangyas are Bengali Muslims who were brought to Burma by the British. They are not indigenous to Burma and that is the reason that they do not get given citizenship. The Bangladeshis have a plan for greater Bangladesh for decades which entails pushing out their excess population into NE India and Burma and then once they become a majority then Bangladesh will claim that area. The Burmese know this and that is why they are intent on kicking all the Rohangyas out of Burma. The Bangladeshi do not accept Rohangya refugees because to them accepting them will put the brakes on their greater Bangladesh scheme.

hahahahahahha..."Greater Bangladesh"?

There is no limitation of dumb conspiracy theories....

Jews controlling the world.

Muslims conspiring to take over the West...

America secretly controlled by illumanati..

and now,

The greater Bangladesh...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hahahahahahha..."Greater Bangladesh"?

There is no limitation of dumb conspiracy theories....

Jews controlling the world.

Muslims conspiring to take over the West...

America secretly controlled by illumanati..

and now,

The greater Bangladesh...

And now PakistaniPunjabi01 is back! How is it going? Couldn't stay away from us could you? :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to comment on Muhammad...As a sikh, I would rather care about Sikh gurus than spewing hatred for the religious figures of others...

And how about as a Pakistani Punjabi? ;)

By the way, I find the idea of "Punjabi Taliban" hilarious. First time I read it, I laughed. Its an oxymoron, Punjabi being fun-loving happy hearted people and Taliban being the exact opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use