Jump to content

Gurudwara Opens In Johannesburg


Recommended Posts

Do not know much about South African Sikhs. We are all aware of East African Sikhs but not much about South Africa. Strange since there is a large subcontintental presence there, particularly Durban.

Well not so strange from the point of view that South Africa's massive 'Indian' community, like that of the Carribean islands, were imported there as semi-slaves i.e bonded indentured labourers. No matter where the Sikh went, he always went as a free and proud man, so Sikhs are usually never found in those semi-slave places. I say 'usually' because the exception here is Fiji. Among the massive Indian semi-slave community there are Sikhs but those Sikhs came much later a free soldiers of the British Army. So, in that respect, I do agree with you that it does seem a little strange that Sikh soldiers were stationed all over the world but not to South Africa. I Suppose the Boer War and its relevance to the Anglo-Sikh wars had something to do with that but strangely Rudyard Kipling, in his famous story about the Boer War 'A Sahib's War', chooses to tell it from the eyes of a Sikh from Punjab 'Umar Singh'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well not so strange from the point of view that South Africa's massive 'Indian' community, like that of the Carribean islands, were imported there as semi-slaves i.e bonded indentured labourers. No matter where the Sikh went, he always went as a free and proud man, so Sikhs are usually never found in those semi-slave places. I say 'usually' because the exception here is Fiji. Among the massive Indian semi-slave community there are Sikhs but those Sikhs came much later a free soldiers of the British Army. So, in that respect, I do agree with you that it does seem a little strange that Sikh soldiers were stationed all over the world but not to South Africa. I Suppose the Boer War and its relevance to the Anglo-Sikh wars had something to do with that but strangely Rudyard Kipling, in his famous story about the Boer War 'A Sahib's War', chooses to tell it from the eyes of a Sikh from Punjab 'Umar Singh'.

Why don't you read history before commenting here. Sikhs fought under the British as slaves and not free men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well not so strange from the point of view that South Africa's massive 'Indian' community, like that of the Carribean islands, were imported there as semi-slaves i.e bonded indentured labourers. No matter where the Sikh went, he always went as a free and proud man, so Sikhs are usually never found in those semi-slave places. I say 'usually' because the exception here is Fiji. Among the massive Indian semi-slave community there are Sikhs but those Sikhs came much later a free soldiers of the British Army. So, in that respect, I do agree with you that it does seem a little strange that Sikh soldiers were stationed all over the world but not to South Africa. I Suppose the Boer War and its relevance to the Anglo-Sikh wars had something to do with that but strangely Rudyard Kipling, in his famous story about the Boer War 'A Sahib's War', chooses to tell it from the eyes of a Sikh from Punjab 'Umar Singh'.

The Boers were brave soldiers with excellent fighting skills. Even the entire might of the British empire could not defeat them. It's only when the British imprisoned all the Boer women and children in concentration camps and many of them began to starve to death that the Boer men surrendered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you read history before commenting here. Sikhs fought under the British as slaves and not free men.

Honestly, I think there's something seriusly wrong with you jsingnz.

You're sitting in New Zealand today not because of what some great clerking some bengali in calcutta did in some office. You're sitting there today because those brave Sikh soldiers laid the foundations for all of us to enjoy the life we have today in English speaking countries. If they had known then that a future generation would spawn an ungratfeul so and so like you I'm sure they would have thought twice.

Like my own family, who proudly served in the British Army, and with it built our Sikh name across the globe, none of them were chained, hooded and tricked into the army like slaves. Each and every one of them made their own free choice to do so. Shame on you....YOU who have done nothing for any generation....Shame on you for enjoying the life they gave to you and yet calling them slaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I think there's something seriusly wrong with you jsingnz.

You're sitting in New Zealand today not because of what some great clerking some bengali in calcutta did in some office. You're sitting there today because those brave Sikh soldiers laid the foundations for all of us to enjoy the life we have today in English speaking countries. If they had known then that a future generation would spawn an ungratfeul so and so like you I'm sure they would have thought twice.

Like my own family, who proudly served in the British Army, and with it built our Sikh name across the globe, none of them were chained, hooded and tricked into the army like slaves. Each and every one of them made their own free choice to do so. Shame on you....YOU who have done nothing for any generation....Shame on you for enjoying the life they gave to you and yet calling them slaves.

Shocking behavior by your ancestors to be proud slaves under the enemy which took our empire by deceit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean they served as proud slaves under the British. No wonder you cannot get rid of your slave mentality.

veer ji

maybe you are unaware that they fought to keep their skills up, they fought to stand upright instead of grovelling under the jackboot, later they fought to control the destiny of their homeland and to rid the world of a hateful tyrant... whatever they did , they honoured their homes, families and Guru they did not hesitate to fight on their terms and die on their terms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Names of the creator that are used in Gurbani, were in existence before any Avtars etc… Raghu…means the the place where the Atma resides, where breathing takes place… Nath means…the master, the creator, etc…
    • Sir my question is why has occurred the need for modern vyakhakaars say this mean this , why our guru patshah used used those word  which are now being explained why did guru create confusion ?
    • Was listening to Sant Ji's katha on youtube.  Sant ji stated apart from the traditional raags, there is nothing wrong if Kirtan is sung in other NON - Raags set up by our Guru Ji's.  His example: Think of poison in a bowl.  Drinking the poison then blaming the bowl is silly. The poison is bad not the bowl. Likewise, we will never call a bowl Amrit once it contains Amrit init. Sameway it's not the raags being good / bad... it's WHAT we put into those raags. How many times Kirtan was sung but on a track of sum Bollywood tune? It is happening in Gurudwara by Raagis! Youtube also has Kaweshri jatha singing history of 1984, on Dr Dre's - Still Dre track.  Rap instrumental/ Bolly tunes stand neutral. We can either put bad things and sing with our own remixes and lyrics... or we can recreate to sing Shabads of Gurbabi, kirtan and Sikh Prachaar over them. 
    • Everything in Gurbani points us towards the Atma. Atma and Parmatma are the same… Atama and Parmatma is the source that creates and causes everything… What have the following items got in common? A fan. A television. A fridge. A radio. A computer..? These things are powered by electricity. Without electricity these things are lifeless. It’s the electricity that causes these things to function… Atma is the source of energy that allows everything to happen.    without Atma, we are lifeless… Call this Atama RAGUNATH…call this Atma by any other name…the fact remains that it’s the life force energy… Dieties also have the same Atma as humans, but they still part of the creation, and not the creator…  
    • Hi I want to know who’s ragunath in gurbani Hindu claim this word appear for ram chandra if we read guru teg bahadur maharaj salok maharaj clearly rejecting ram gayo ravan geo but at the last pangti Kahu naanak īh bipaṭi mai tek ēyk ragɦunaaṭɦ ॥55॥ Says Nanak, in this calamity, the Lord alone is my support who is this ragunaath why would maharaj use ragunath as refrence for god?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use