Jump to content

Gurudwara Opens In Johannesburg


Recommended Posts

Do not know much about South African Sikhs. We are all aware of East African Sikhs but not much about South Africa. Strange since there is a large subcontintental presence there, particularly Durban.

Well not so strange from the point of view that South Africa's massive 'Indian' community, like that of the Carribean islands, were imported there as semi-slaves i.e bonded indentured labourers. No matter where the Sikh went, he always went as a free and proud man, so Sikhs are usually never found in those semi-slave places. I say 'usually' because the exception here is Fiji. Among the massive Indian semi-slave community there are Sikhs but those Sikhs came much later a free soldiers of the British Army. So, in that respect, I do agree with you that it does seem a little strange that Sikh soldiers were stationed all over the world but not to South Africa. I Suppose the Boer War and its relevance to the Anglo-Sikh wars had something to do with that but strangely Rudyard Kipling, in his famous story about the Boer War 'A Sahib's War', chooses to tell it from the eyes of a Sikh from Punjab 'Umar Singh'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well not so strange from the point of view that South Africa's massive 'Indian' community, like that of the Carribean islands, were imported there as semi-slaves i.e bonded indentured labourers. No matter where the Sikh went, he always went as a free and proud man, so Sikhs are usually never found in those semi-slave places. I say 'usually' because the exception here is Fiji. Among the massive Indian semi-slave community there are Sikhs but those Sikhs came much later a free soldiers of the British Army. So, in that respect, I do agree with you that it does seem a little strange that Sikh soldiers were stationed all over the world but not to South Africa. I Suppose the Boer War and its relevance to the Anglo-Sikh wars had something to do with that but strangely Rudyard Kipling, in his famous story about the Boer War 'A Sahib's War', chooses to tell it from the eyes of a Sikh from Punjab 'Umar Singh'.

Why don't you read history before commenting here. Sikhs fought under the British as slaves and not free men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well not so strange from the point of view that South Africa's massive 'Indian' community, like that of the Carribean islands, were imported there as semi-slaves i.e bonded indentured labourers. No matter where the Sikh went, he always went as a free and proud man, so Sikhs are usually never found in those semi-slave places. I say 'usually' because the exception here is Fiji. Among the massive Indian semi-slave community there are Sikhs but those Sikhs came much later a free soldiers of the British Army. So, in that respect, I do agree with you that it does seem a little strange that Sikh soldiers were stationed all over the world but not to South Africa. I Suppose the Boer War and its relevance to the Anglo-Sikh wars had something to do with that but strangely Rudyard Kipling, in his famous story about the Boer War 'A Sahib's War', chooses to tell it from the eyes of a Sikh from Punjab 'Umar Singh'.

The Boers were brave soldiers with excellent fighting skills. Even the entire might of the British empire could not defeat them. It's only when the British imprisoned all the Boer women and children in concentration camps and many of them began to starve to death that the Boer men surrendered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you read history before commenting here. Sikhs fought under the British as slaves and not free men.

Honestly, I think there's something seriusly wrong with you jsingnz.

You're sitting in New Zealand today not because of what some great clerking some bengali in calcutta did in some office. You're sitting there today because those brave Sikh soldiers laid the foundations for all of us to enjoy the life we have today in English speaking countries. If they had known then that a future generation would spawn an ungratfeul so and so like you I'm sure they would have thought twice.

Like my own family, who proudly served in the British Army, and with it built our Sikh name across the globe, none of them were chained, hooded and tricked into the army like slaves. Each and every one of them made their own free choice to do so. Shame on you....YOU who have done nothing for any generation....Shame on you for enjoying the life they gave to you and yet calling them slaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I think there's something seriusly wrong with you jsingnz.

You're sitting in New Zealand today not because of what some great clerking some bengali in calcutta did in some office. You're sitting there today because those brave Sikh soldiers laid the foundations for all of us to enjoy the life we have today in English speaking countries. If they had known then that a future generation would spawn an ungratfeul so and so like you I'm sure they would have thought twice.

Like my own family, who proudly served in the British Army, and with it built our Sikh name across the globe, none of them were chained, hooded and tricked into the army like slaves. Each and every one of them made their own free choice to do so. Shame on you....YOU who have done nothing for any generation....Shame on you for enjoying the life they gave to you and yet calling them slaves.

Shocking behavior by your ancestors to be proud slaves under the enemy which took our empire by deceit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean they served as proud slaves under the British. No wonder you cannot get rid of your slave mentality.

veer ji

maybe you are unaware that they fought to keep their skills up, they fought to stand upright instead of grovelling under the jackboot, later they fought to control the destiny of their homeland and to rid the world of a hateful tyrant... whatever they did , they honoured their homes, families and Guru they did not hesitate to fight on their terms and die on their terms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ik i'm a few (13) years late but basically: Get a single Mal-mal dastar (around 3-5 metres) and starch it. You just whisk 2 ladles of starch (Kershaw's, cornstarch or maida) with around 5 cups of water until it's completely smooth and mix it on low heat flame for around 20 mins until it goes clear and think like water. When this cools off, take a clean but damp turban and soak it into the starch and make sure you coat the whole dastar evenly You leave it out to hang dry in the sun/air. Once dry u can store it in a cool, dry place until you wanna tie it (for about 4 months) Take the dastar, sprinkle some water all throughout the turban to make it slightly wet and just soft enough to tie. Then you and another person hold the dastar at each end to make a stretched rectangle (two people holding one corner in each of their hands). Fold it in half width-wise 3 times. Tie the turban like this quite loosely. The starch will make it tighter as it dries BUT TIE IT STAIGHT ONTO YOUR HEAD. NO MINi-TURBAN BENEATH IT. JUST TIE YOUR FLATTENED JOORA ON TOP OF YOUR HEAD AND THE DASTAR DIRECTLY ON TOP Secure it with pins and wear it on your head until it has dried from the water you sprinkled before the pooni. After it has completely dried (give it around 3-4 hours just to make sure) you take it off your head DO NOT UNWRAP IT TAKE IT OFF IN IT'S SHAPE and the next time you need to wear you can just place it on your head over your flattened joora instead of tying this. You can do this for around 5 months after you first tied it until you have to ever tie it again.
    • I tie a Punjabi style dastar with starch. Why do people hate this so much? Once when I was tying my dastar my neck seized up and the apna doctor said staying in that position daily for more than 5 mins is dangerous. He recommended a starched pagg like his dad. And I respect my pagg more than my life. I put it on the top shelf of my cupboard whenever it isn't on my head, recite Waheguruji da naam whenever I am tying my joora, fifty and when i place the Dastar on my head and I mata thek and kiss  it before I do. And when I do tie it (every 4 months when the starch starts to weaken) I make sure that I pooni and tie it with much love and whilst reciting paath. I get that if someone treats their turban like a hat (eg: throwing it on the floor, cramping it or just disrespecting it) then this is unacceptable but just cos one puts their pagg on their head rather than tying it each time doesn't mean they treat it as such. (and let's be honest, starched or not we've all put our dad's pagg on our head like a hat when we were kids as a joke and meant no disrespect. Intention is everything). Ik Singhs who get angry tying their pagg and start doing maa/phen di gaaliyan, and when they take it off they just throw to the side and wait to tie it again next time. (Also, I'm from a Jat Sikh family so pls don't try to make this about "starched paggs are tarkhan/caste based" or anything stupid like that). PS: I do remember that stupidness in the 90s/early 2000s UK when Sikh men used to have a tiny starched paggs and were completely clean shaven or had a little goatee like Herbie Sahara/ Vijay from achanak. Now THAT was stupid and deserves all the hate but I just mean the concept of a starched dastar whether it's Punjabi Style, Kenyan style or whatever
    • Anyone know how to tie this turban? My Nani's dad tied it, it was starched but i can't work out whether the pooni was kenyan orpunjabi (like folded or an actual pooni). This was very common before partition, and uses a single dastar (not double stitched). Is it js Kenyan pagg with a higher larr?
    • It doesn't matter. What the nihangs did 100 years ago has no relevance today. Because people fight differently now. As a karate black belt, 90% of what we learn is useless, cos it revolves around how people fought 100 years ago. Today, most teenage boys likely to cause fights (at least in the uk) do boxing. But when boxing was really popular, people used to throw punches, hence why the "man to man fist fight" image was there. But now that UFC is popular, people do all sorts like grappling, knees and all (even with no training).  And also, I highly doubt anyone ever attacked a nihang Singh unarmed back then, just by seeing their saroop with shastaraan. What they did do, however, was Loh Mushti but that was more of a sport than a combat system. They definitely would have trained in basic fighting like wrestling and strikes but not a system. Because any good fighter knows that trying to find a "code" to fight by is stupid. But in terms of unarmed fighting, it was rare and probably revolved around disarming an armed attacker (do NOT even attemp to learn that, you will get killed and there's no point even trying to learn).   If you're interested for historical/ preservation purposed then great, but if you want to learn it for self defense or fighting tactics then pls don't, because what worked then won't work now and Nihangs were probably quite limited in hand to hand combat training cos they're armed to the teeth, deterring any unarmed attacker and killing one if they tried to fight
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use