Jump to content

Ex. Jathedar Jasbir Singh Rode


Recommended Posts

And your point is?

Only traitors of the Panth will respect traitors.

Just look at History, even when Gurgaddi was passed onto various guru sahib's it took time for the Sangat to actually see who the true Guru was. Baba Sri Chand turned his back on Guru Nanak Dev Ji but he was highly respected, so much so that Guru Hargobind Ji gave him a son purely because he asked.

My point which you missed was that in the turmoil it was hard for many Sikhs then to see right from wrong, it usually took time and even with that it didn't destroy the deception for everyone. Guru Harkrishan Ji's elder brother for one, he was said to have had occult powers which he used, these sort of things mislead people into following him and by extension giving him respect.

Guru Sahib were (politically, spiritually etc) extremely powerful. Many people did have a begrudging respect for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Brother baba joginder has a controversial history himself. Not passing judgement, he may go genuine or not, i dont know

People will make controversy on anyone, if the controversy has no facts backing it up its just as good as a plain lie.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody really respects Prithi Chand, nor do they respect Dhir Mal, both of which were directly related to Guru Sahib himself, (Vaheguru on Earth and elsewhere). So people just being scared of some Mahpurakhs relative would be harder to believe.

The context post 84 is completely different, a comparison cannot be made. Had Sant Ji been alive the sell outs would have been dealt with swiftly or at the very least banished from the Panth and given Tankhaiye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, let me provide you details of CBI agents on the internet.

That wouldn't be very smart of me, now would it?

Only if you were a CBI agent yourself?

Are you a CBI agent, or do you support them, that you feel you need to protect their identitiies?

Aren't these CBI-wallah the ones who have harmed the Panth a lot?

So why do you feel you need to protect their identities?

Expose them, or are you afraid of exposing yourself?

Lol. Good answer to a chain of stupid questions.

This CBI agent laughs at anything. Always had my suspicions about this agent from nz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also Jasbir Singh Rode is credited/blamed for telling Sikhs to boycott elections which led to beanta winning on 10%...

Another comment that beggars belief.

If you wish to comment on this, then please research the history before making any wild accusations. There will always be a comeback, if not in this life, then definitely before Dharam Raj.

Bhai Jasvir Singh had nothing to do with this decision. It was the Panthic Committee, specifically Bittu who decided it, against the wishes of other members. And it destroyed the movement. But it had nothing to do with Bhai Jasvir Singh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What? I dont get your question. During the Sarbat Khalsa days Khalistan was declared the goal, Rode was declared the jathedar. Then in prison, Rode and govt officials came to agreements. Rode suddenly started seeking out ways to bring people to the negotiation table, some were open to negotiation but the Panthic Committees and their men were not.

Of course you don't get my question, because I feel that you really do not know the ins and outs of this era of Sikh politics.

Who wrote the "Puran Azadi" statement?

Who made the 180 degree turn?

Who became the scapegoat?

Who benefitted from it most?

These are all questions you need to know the answers to understand this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So, are you saying Guru ji isn't God? Or are you saying the British encouraged this belief?
    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use