Jump to content

Bhai Ranjit Singh Dhadrianwale And Jatha Attacked


Recommended Posts

You're happy with the insult towards Udasi Kirpal then?

No I wasn't but I thought that you guys would have defended Guru ka Ladla Kirpal Das yourselves ...so here goes ...when you start comparing someone who had nazar and thappi of dhan dhan Guru Pita Guru Gobind Singh ji maharaj with someone who supports the willful ullangana of SIkh Rehit may you be brought to your senses by Guru Patshah ...rehit bina nahin sikh kahave... whoever follows a bemukh becomes bemukh themselves so use your bibek buddhi and distance yourself from those who court Guru Patshah ji's displeasure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A similiar physique to Udasi Mahant Kirpal then?

What a total non-sequitur. I wasn't insulting all short overweight people, least of all Mahant Kirpal Das. I was insulting Dhumma. Not all short and overweight people look like fantasy dwarves. Harnam Dhumma does. A joke works better when you don't have to explain it.

No I wasn't but I thought that you guys would have defended Guru ka Ladla Kirpal Das yourselves ...

Oh please, I wasn't attacking Mahant Ji and you know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't insulting all short overweight people, I was insulting Dhumma. Not all short and overweight people look like fantasy dwarves. Harnam Dhumma does. A joke works better when you don't have to explain it.

Oh please, I wasn't attacking Mahant Ji and you know it. This isn't the first time you've pretended I've insulted a figure within Sikh history.

bhai sahib I understood but a certain memna doesn't want to let it lie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a total non-sequitur. I wasn't insulting all short overweight people, least of all Mahant Kirpal Das. I was insulting Dhumma. Not all short and overweight people look like fantasy dwarves. Harnam Dhumma does. A joke works better when you don't have to explain it.

Why? You make fun of Baba Harnam Singh because of his body shape. Why are you insulting because of this, but can say it doesn't aplply to other people who had the same body shape?

A joke workd better if it is actually a joke, and not just a stupid dig at someone.

Oh please, I wasn't attacking Mahant Ji and you know it.

I know, because Mahant Ji didn't figure at all in your mind when you invented this "joke", but as you now know that Mahant Ji was of a similar physique you have to explain yourself.

bhai sahib I understood but a certain memna doesn't want to let it lie

Why should we let insults and lies lie?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? You make fun of Baba Harnam Singh because of his body shape. Why are you insulting because of this, but can say it doesn't aplply to other people who had the same body shape?

A joke workd better if it is actually a joke, and not just a stupid dig at someone.

I know, because Mahant Ji didn't figure at all in your mind when you invented this "joke", but as you now know that Mahant Ji was of a similar physique you have to explain yourself.

Why should we let insults and lies lie?

Let me say it again then. His body shape was only one small part of my quip about his looking like a dwarf. If he had a little curved nakh instead of his own, or a less flat face, but was nevertheless fat, he would still not look like a dwarf anymore and I wouldn't have had occasion to make the remark to which you've taken such disproportionate offense. The bit about being fat really was incidental. It's the uncanny conjunction of fat-short-bignosed-flatfaced possessed by Dhumma that I was pointing out. Did Mahant Ji possess all these features too? If not, then bringing him up isn't really relevant.

'Insults and lies'? I can't argue that I haven't been insulting, but I also haven't lied about anything here.

Please provide an extract from a historical granth which authenticates your claim that Mahant Ji was as fat as Harnam Dhumma. Maharaj makes no such claim when he mentions the Udaasi in Sri Dasam Granth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's great that he realised using Sant as title is bad and changed to Bhai.

that goes for all self styled sants. Guru Sahib didn't even give great Sikhs the title sant, Sikhs like bhai matti das bhai satti dass, they were bhais, Same with the Panj pyaera. Yet so many people go round calling themselves sant these days.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't have had occasion to make the remark to which you've taken such disproportionate offense.

It's not disproportionate. You used his body shape as a means of ridicule, now when you are told that there was another SIkh like him, you backtrack and come up with umpteenth excuses. Better not to say anything in the first place.

Please provide an extract from a historical granth which authenticates your claim that Mahant Ji was as fat as Harnam Dhumma. Maharaj makes no such claim when he mentions the Udaasi in Sri Dasam Granth.

Listen to the katha of his story by SJS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use