Jump to content

Hindu decrease in India


Dsinghd
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Dsinghdp said:

Hinduism is decreasing day by day in India. RSS and Shiv Sena are going crazy. More and more Dalits are leaving Hinduism (many have become Muslims). Only our great Guru Tegh Bahadur saved Dharma and Sanskrit in Hindustan.

IT's not called hinduism. There are so many dharmik panths and folk traditions which hindustanis/Bharatis follow. It is not hindu"ism", that's colonial/gora mentality to call it a religion....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Dsinghdp said:

Hinduism is decreasing day by day in India. RSS and Shiv Sena are going crazy. More and more Dalits are leaving Hinduism (many have become Muslims). Only our great Guru Tegh Bahadur saved Dharma and Sanskrit in Hindustan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

this is the price they are paying for aghiratghana , they are now becoming what Guru ji saved them from.  RSS are thugs who are majority criminals already; over 8 members of BJP cabinet have active criminal cases against them including one being investigated for murder.

Dalits were never considered part of the Dharma according to such thugs only they exist for serving the Brahmins as slaves and should feel thankful for that. So the 80 percent of who are claimed by Hindu propagandists are not hindus by the fact of their treatment and denial of knowledge of the faith/s. So India was never really 'Hindu' dominant it was lacking in dharma generally...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ipledgeblue said:

IT's not called hinduism. There are so many dharmik panths and folk traditions which hindustanis/Bharatis follow. It is not hindu"ism", that's colonial/gora mentality to call it a religion....

Meanwhile, bro, the average Hindu on the street, when asked what what religion/dharam/mazhab he belongs to will say "I am a Hindu". The term is used in the Constitution of India (Hindu religion).

If the basic law of the country uses the terminology of Hindu religion, why do you feel the need to object? It's like trying to be more Catholic than the Pope. The Sikhs, Muslims, or Christians did not impose the Constitution on the Hindus, the latter imposed it on the former.

Just wondering, how do you define "ism"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Meanwhile, bro, the average Hindu on the street, when asked what what religion/dharam/mazhab he belongs to will say "I am a Hindu". The term is used in the Constitution of India (Hindu religion).

If the basic law of the country uses the terminology of Hindu religion, why do you feel the need to object? It's like trying to be more Catholic than the Pope. The Sikhs, Muslims, or Christians did not impose the Constitution on the Hindus, the latter imposed it on the former.

Just wondering, how do you define "ism"?

fact is the majority of the law is inherited from angrez they changed very little thus hindu ...and stupid sloganeering such Hindu Hindi Hindusthan

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the Muslims made a huge mistake by creating Pakistan in 1947. Had Pakistan not been created, today Indian sub continental Muslim population would have been close to 550 million and that number is set to grow. India's Hindus are not aggressive nor strong enough to handle so many Muslims. What partition did was to cut the Muslim population down to size. Size small enough that the Hindus can handle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use