Jump to content

My cousin is going to get married to a non amritdhari girl!!!


1Anonymous1
 Share

Recommended Posts

The question is: does the Amritdhari influence the non Amritdhari to get closer to the faith and start practicing more - or does it work the other way, with the Amritdhari getting more lax? 

I think these things boil down to who has the most aura and strength in the relationship to influence the other. Maybe the girl finds something attractive in the Amritdharis lifestyle that she might follow in future? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Best hope those facial genetics are in order, because there's no gym for the face, lol.

You don't know the secret do you? You can actually be butt-ugly but confident and in good physical nick and girls will flock to you. Look at how many pretty young things are with butch, butt ugly, macho types. lol

Oh well, I guess we can try some facial exercises or something then.... 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

I think its wrong that he's marrying a non amritdhari. When I was initiated into amrit, they told us to marry amritdhari(s) only. Ive heard if a married couple wants to become initiated into amrit, both have to go and get initiated and not just one. Think about the jhootha perspective too, Ive heard jhootha-ness of peoples can influence themselves. From which angle is she a Sikh anyways? Ive heard from someone that even Anand Karaj is only for amritdharis only too, since amritdhari(s) pledged to be faithful to Sikh Dharam.

What is a sehajdhari Sikh anyways? I thought sehajdharis are Sikhs who have not been blessed with amrit, but also do not do the four maha bujjar kurehits. If someone does bujjar kurehits, then how are they sehajdhari? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Stop this AnandKaraj

This sham marriage cannot allowed to take place!

This Anand Karaj must be blocked as non-Amritdhari's are not allowed.

Let us know which Gurdwara this sham marriage will take place at so we can block it by protesting

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:

Look on the positive side. Hopefully, the fiance will become an amritdhari after marriage. Most ppl will tell the amritdhari guy, that ur wife needs to take amrit after a bit. Then they both can take amrit together. Sometimes it takes a while to convince the wife. 

In the meantime, they are both sikhs and will continue coming to the gurudwara

She already has him wrapped around her finger.  He's falling head over heals for her and is willing to abandon the Guru's teachings.  He choose a woman beauty over his Guru's hukam.  Just like jagmeet Singh the NDP leader or should I say soon to be former leader.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Guest Stop this AnandKaraj said:

This sham marriage cannot allowed to take place!

This Anand Karaj must be blocked as non-Amritdhari's are not allowed.

Let us know which Gurdwara this sham marriage will take place at so we can block it by protesting

 

Really, this is what it's come to, a Amritdhari marrying an non-amritdhari (but happens to be from a Sikh family) and you want to protest, surely there are more important things to protest about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hope or belief that the amritdhari partner will inspire the non-amritdhari is a naive pipedream. I'm not saying it never happens, but more often than not it leads to the partner who is Gursikh to become lax. It happens gradually at first, but there is definitely a downward spiral. Of course, it depends on whether the amritdhari partner was particularly observant to begin with.

From what I've observed over the past decade or so, the ONLY difference between younger non-amritdharis and amritdharis is uncut hair. The inner is virtually indistinguishable across the two categories. Never mind, though, ey, that lovely royal blue dastaar and flowing beard has 'em all fooled well and proper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use