Jump to content

Where were the white males?


Premi5
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Premi5 said:

In all these places up north, where predominantly white working class girls were groomed - where were the stereotypical proud northern white working class brothers/fathers/uncles (yes I am aware that maybe they are from families where the father is absent) ?

The answer to that would require an essay, lol. It all feeds into the gradual yet purposeful post-war social and political policies engendered by the establishment that have hit the working classes the hardest. IMO there's definite parallels between the demoralisation of the white working classes in places like England, and the way India has gone about dealing with its rural Sikh populations. You don't need to physically harm anyone in order to destroy their spirit. A certain Sikh yodha mentioned something about the death of a conscience. Of course, there's enough plausible deniability in both cases for those who haven't succumbed to those problem to poo-poo the possibility of such issues being a reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, puzzled said:

A lot of whites are accepting of their women dating ethnic men   but they probably were not aware of it leading to grooming.

 

males tend to see women as "honour" . So they wouldn't usually tolerate their sisters/daughters marrying outside the community or religion or race. 

Unless in case of rajput hindus who deliberately married their daughters to mughals just to form a stronger relationship with the mughals which in turn gave a considerable degree of insurance that the rajput kingdom and hindus in general would be safer in an islamic india .

LOL

This also explains why "saala" (wife's brother) is considered a slur in india. Basically the wife's brother is the "loser" who let you screw his sister. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

males tend to see women as "honour" . So they wouldn't usually tolerate their sisters/daughters marrying outside the community or religion or race. 

Unless in case of rajput hindus who deliberately married their daughters to mughals just to form a stronger relationship with the mughals which in turn gave a considerable degree of insurance that the rajput kingdom and hindus in general would be safer in an islamic india .

LOL

This also explains why "saala" (wife's brother) is considered a slur in india. Basically the wife's brother is the "loser" who let you screw his sister. 

many whites don't actually mind when their women marry ethnic men, In some multicultural areas half the white women are with black men. Whites don't really have this concept of family honour lol      seeing a white woman with a ethnic man is actually common in many multicultural towns and cities. 

Rajput case ij interesting, once heroic warriors, they even defeated the early islamic arab invasions like in the battle of rajasthan, and then they became so weak that they started getting their daughters married off to the invaders!  I think their ego was the cause of their slow and embarrassing downfall,   perhaps Sikhs can learn from this ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, puzzled said:

many whites don't actually mind when their women marry ethnic men, In some multicultural areas half the white women are with black men. Whites don't really have this concept of family honour lol     

I don't think this is really true. 

Most goray if they're honest (at least excluding 'millennials' generation onwards) do not want their family members marrying out of the same demographic unless the husband/partner is thought to be a reasonable match.

Certainly, I don't think they would put up with their female relatives being abused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Premi5 said:

In all these places up north, where predominantly white working class girls were groomed - where were the stereotypical proud northern white working class brothers/fathers/uncles (yes I am aware that maybe they are from families where the father is absent) ?

They were probably too scared of paks because they've been battered by them previously.  Same in London. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

Also, the police and political reaction (which was essentially collusion with the pedos) probably put them on a back foot too. 

If you look at all the stories and backgrounds , the police and social services 'marked' those who try to raise concerns or interrupt the pedos. The pedos as they were mainly family related or clan related also used their vote blocks (councillors and local politicians many of whom were also involved ) to get the authorities to target any whistleblowers or disruptors. Basically it was and still is a sick situation . Watch the Sikh youth UK vids on how the police would arrest those trying to stop the pedos and not the culprits 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use