Jump to content

HOLLYWOOD MOVIE FEATURING A SIKH !!


harjinder
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

a couple of other actos have their head covered, maybe he could have just done that?

Veerji then they would have said hes wearing a hat or a touque... it just never ends wacko.gif

grin.gif <-- hey he kinda looks like this doesnt he??? :|

Fateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although Mann KAum liye Qurban defo has a point, it would be a lto easier if he wore a PAtka or sometihng and there was a scene of two with him Nanga sir - would due

but from the story it seems it's mostly underwater tongue.gif

although we should give a big hadn of pplaud to him..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some people have already pointed this out, but this movie is really a blessing for Sikhs in America.

Some of the positive points :

1) Americans can see a FULL sardar….not a half sardar or partial sardar.

2) Americans can see what is actually under the turban. They will learn the reason why Sikhs wear a turban ( the practical side). Americans will see that Sikhs keep uncut hair and they need a turban to cover it.

3) We can start building knowledge currency. “What’s a Sikh dude?” answer: “Remember that movie…”

4) Hollywood will be the best way to counter Bollywood nonsense. When Americans see a Sikh…THEY WILL REMEMBER! We can break away from the stereotype that Americans have of Indians as being “ curry eating, funny talking, hindus”. Americans will see us distinct from being just Indians.

5) This will open the door for more roles with Sikhs…even if it’s just for the “exotic” factor.

We have organizations like SMART, Sikh Coalition, etc whp are engaged in educating Americans. Just think what this movie will do for exposure. It will at least make Americans curious about us.

Plus, Sikhs don’t have to wear a Turban all the time. If the situation requires, a Sikh can take it off.

Like when bathing….being in WATER.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree on both sides. seeing sikh bare head is also not a good sight, but hey that will save us from lotsss of questions from ppls asking what's inside the turban and at least they will know that its HAIR and so on. But still its kinda touching topic..

But it's better step taken by hollywood of having a real sardar, maybe in future they will improve a lot. Look at English patient, a mona hindu guy did the role of Sikh, now we have a sikh doing the role of sikh :wub: I think it's good and it's wayyy better than what bollywood do in the category of sikh roles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i say more power to him :TH:

after decades of seeing skanky mumbai-an actors with dead rodents strapped to their faces acting like sikhs are nothing but dhol-playing drunks, terrorists & criminals that also do a bit of idol worship when they get some spare time from their dhol-playing, drinking, terrorism and crime-

this is GOOD to see

:wub: ))))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guys drop the political correctness the guys got kesh and dhari but where is his dastar????  he looks silly in the second picture holding a video camera with his gotee on his head , what a wasted oppurtunity.

If you people slamming the guy for not wearing a turban in a couple scenes haven't noticed, this movie is about DEEP SEA DIVERS, leave it to Sikhs to immediately go after the faults of one gursikhs accomplishments even when he's not doing anything wrong, how can you go deep sea diving with a full keski?!?! ridiculous. nonono.gif

its not ridiculous... u can still wear a ramal or patka to keep your hair covered...

...also we should reserve judgement until we actually see the movie, it could be great...

...but if it has seens with him drinking, and going out with girls etc, it wont be great...

but until we see it, we shouldnt knock it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use