Can Sikhi be separated from the land of Punjab?

[GurjantGnostic]

7 hours ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:

So who did the holocaust target  if not the descendents of jews in europe?

They're europeans..ish..certainly weren't Jews though. Germany was a poorer exploited family member of their invasive group. Like an unadorned finger. Which is why Germany got mad. They found out there's a table, they have a seat at it and hadn't gotten their share. So they turned on those at that table who were greeding up all the money. Ww2 was a civil war. 

You could say Israelis are descended from Essau and Kain in the Torah. Jews are Jacobites. 

[MisterrSingh]

A nation is blood and soil. 

If the people around you share neither your blood and an attachment to the soil, then what binds these people together? 

Matters of the soul and the spirit will always outweigh issues of materialism, i.e. economics. If the argument for a nation is solely made on economic terms, then you have to look very closely at WHO is making these arguments and WHY. 

[Kau89r8]

[MisterrSingh]

2 hours ago, Kau89r8 said:

When the UAE or Saudis (i.e. MUSLIMS) want to establish centres in your country / state / city, the subtext is that they want to create Islamic centres and mosques as a consequence of this presence so that they can proselytize their religion under the guise of "assistance."

So, in that respect, perhaps this is a positive. How many fronts can we fight this battle? Hindus, Christians, AND Muslims?!? It isn't happening. We're being overwhelmed with forces that wish to completely subsume us.

I don't expect the corrupt, greedy Punjab administration to see this in anything but purely econmic terms. They have NO interest in protecting the Sikh faith, only in how much money they can line their pockets.

[Kau89r8]

2 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

When the UAE or Saudis (i.e. MUSLIMS) want to establish centres in your country / state / city, the subtext is that they want to create Islamic centres and mosques as a consequence of this presence so that they can proselytize their religion under the guise of "assistance."

So, in that respect, perhaps this is a positive. How many fronts can we fight this battle? Hindus, Christians, AND Muslims?!? It isn't happening. We're being overwhelmed with forces that wish to completely subsume us.

 

......you do have one heck of thinking...wish i was smart whip as you lol

What are you thoughts on bill...if they don't repeal what will happen to Punjab esp Sikhs.....whats your forecast economically and Sikhi wise? 

Eventually 5-10 yrs ambani and andanis have majority ownership of Punjab lands ...Sikhs will be minority/non-existent...More factories foreign in Punjab 

End up like this

 

 

[jkvlondon]

On 12/27/2020 at 8:18 AM, Arsh1469 said:

Sikhi has already lost half of Punjab (The Punjab in Pakistan) If we lose all of Punjab we have lost our nation.

correction sikhs lost 5/6ths of Punjab it currentely only a sixth of the original . time to set our stamp on the minds of the whole of India by leading the fight against these theiving brahmins/gujus

 

[Kau89r8]

27 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

correction sikhs lost 5/6ths of Punjab it currentely only a sixth of the original . time to set our stamp on the minds of the whole of India by leading the fight against these theiving brahmins/gujus

 

We were already 'minority' of Punjab then?, we lost the Majority Sikh populated Punjab, but final sixth of majority Sikhs of Punjab living is the last straw 

 

[Kau89r8]

On 12/26/2020 at 6:11 PM, MisterrSingh said:

Should it or not? The obvious answer most of you will reply with is Sikh migration to UK, Canada, USA, etc., but that's because the Punjab we know is still hovering in the back of our consciousness. We know it's there even if we aren't connected to it directly.

But what if Sikhi's link to Punjab was severed definitively? What would we lose as a people? What would we gain?

Is it necessary for a spiritual or religious movement to have physical, material roots in a specific geographic location, or is the only important consideration the ideology itself?

I'm not quite certain which side of the argument i stand.

What version of Sikhi do we have left in Punjab? Badal, Capitan = rss/anti Khalsa version..

1. No protection from no Sikh bodies...SGPC, Akali Dal, Akal Takht (have they supported the farmers bill, the head Jathedar Harpreet Singh? Bet you they're also sold out)

2. Politics - we all know the answer..and who can we trust future leader eventually they'll be sold out

3. Prison - torture, jail no freedom speech, innocents being frames

4. Police + Court = all under hinduvstas and protection killers of 1984 lurking around in courts judges police

5. Drugs + alcohol 

6. Everything sold out to the central gov....what investment can we bring to Punjab.....no jobs farmers suicide etc

7. Also the Shiv Sena and Hindus of Punjab the love India that hate us  cannot be trusted

8. Christian Missionaries 

This is the last straw

[MisterrSingh]

4 hours ago, Kau89r8 said:

......you do have one heck of thinking...wish i was smart whip as you lol

What are you thoughts on bill...if they don't repeal what will happen to Punjab esp Sikhs.....whats your forecast economically and Sikhi wise? 

Eventually 5-10 yrs ambani and andanis have majority ownership of Punjab lands ...Sikhs will be minority/non-existent...More factories foreign in Punjab

 

It's like I mentioned a couple of years ago. They want to force Sikhs out of Punjab by making life unbearable and unliveable for the population. Those who will have no choice but to remain will be mentally broken. Currently it's a multi-pronged attack: economic, religious, and social. Demographic replacement, too.

Regarding the earlier post about wealthy Muslim money vested interests, here's a perfect example:

 

[Guest]

The answer is “No”. Sikhi cannot only be seperated from Punjab, but it CANNOT be seperated from India.

Bharat is the land of Enlightenment. The land where the 10 Gurus, Bhagats, Peer, Pegambars chose to take birth. The land where Dhruv, Prahlad and avtars of devtas took place. 
 

Now, I know some khalistanis will frown at me. Whatever you say or believe. Sikhism is Real Hinduism philosophy of Sat Jug. All Rishs Munis had unshorn hair and jura. 33 crore devtas all kept hair. All Sants were shasterdhari in previous yugas. Sikhism is a continuation of this philosophy.

I believe that Modern day Hinduism is not even hinduism. It is corrupt and totally a different dharma that is full of superstitions, blind idol worshipping, no real gyan and kachi bani. 
 

So no. No matter what u guys say. All Western Countries are Grossly materialistcs. Puratan Sikh sants did maha-tap and endured a lot of hardships to attain mukti. Ppl in western countries want to sit in their comfy houses, save money, watch movies and do a bit of meditation here and there.

No peer pegambar took birth in any Western country. These countries are home for bhoot prets. They are the cultures where porn, gambling and alcoholism originated.