Jump to content

Why our freedom movement died out?


shastarSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, shastarSingh said:

Do u think geography has a role to play?

If Sikh khaarrkus had the geography like Afghanistan, things would have been completely different?

We needed power wealth. They took that away we left being foot soldiers for India and rest whilst Brahmans rules. 

Look how Jews did after the holocaust. Acquisition of resources, capital and influence, common understanding needed to power up being persecuted minority. 

Obvs in hindsight i wish Sant Ji and all Khrakus mass migrated to west after 47. Built wealth and then lobbied for Sikh nation.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, intrigued said:

Can you send links to the above two books of Sau Sakhi. Am about to start the Sikh Revolution :)

You sure you got the balls for it mate? It can get ugly.  lol

You can get them from here, but it's a good idea to check the old english translation, it's a bit wanting at places, but given it's age it still has merit:

https://www.scribd.com/doc/73649680/Sau-Sakhi-English-Translation-by-Attar-Singh-1873

 

Gurmukhi edition by Piara Singh Padam:

https://www.scribd.com/doc/252239556/Sau-Sakhi-Ed-Piara-Singh-Padam-Panjabi

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The Taliban always received tacit support from the Pakistani intelligence services and the Pakistani establishment. 

People said similar about a few kharku groups too, until Bhutto switched it up. I think out of mujboori some might have got weapons from there. So that can't be the simple answer here. 

 

51 minutes ago, Kau89r8 said:

Obvs in hindsight i wish Sant Ji and all Khrakus mass migrated to west after 47. Built wealth and then lobbied for Sikh nation.

 47???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, shastarSingh said:

Do u think geography has a role to play?

If Sikh khaarrkus had the geography like Afghanistan, things would have been completely different?

It plays a part, just being higher up makes the oxygen thinner, which has an effect on constituency,  and walking up and down mountains in your sandles from young is great exercise.

Also lots of places to hide. But then you could say the kharkus had lots of places to hide in the khets? 

I think some races/people feel A LOT MORE anger at being invaded, and their being indignant sustains that hostility and will to fight. They simply cannot mentally accept the idea of subjugation.  I think a lot of our lot are like friendly teddy bears to outsiders in that respect. You can tell by looking at their faces. 

A few years ago I remember talking to one young Hazara refugee who lived in London (he was a bit of a lad), and he told me that in the early days (when he was child) they'd throw away the biscuits and stuff the american soldiers gave them to butter them up where they lived.

Another thing is that a lot of sullay properly accept 'the will of Allah' to stony faced degrees. I think this helps with death, or injuries (like getting a foot or hand amputated)?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Most countries gain freedom if there are big backers in the background. 

India would never had gained independence if the US never gave the UK pressure. It was in the US agenda to cut the British Empire down.

And the english basically supported the creation of parkistan. 

That agains shows how dumb our (especially rural lot) can be, in that they can't even recognise a friend from a foe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use