Jump to content

sikhs have no ingroup loyalty


proudkaur21
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

27 minutes ago, PuzzledToo said:

Don't forget this clown

 

I used to like her but she used to tweet out panthic stuff, she called out Hindu terrorists and they all came after her in the indian media etc maybe this is why she took a different turn.. Not much you can do ..their Hindu lobby/influence is powerful and strong 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PuzzledToo said:

Don't forget this clown

 

 

1 hour ago, Kau89r8 said:

 

I used to like her but she used to tweet out panthic stuff, she called out Hindu terrorists and they all came after her in the indian media etc maybe this is why she took a different turn.. Not much you can do ..their Hindu lobby/influence is powerful and strong 

 

That tweet was fake news

50 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

After all Sikh history is British history. 

 

What a numpty........I know she's helped SYUK and that but effing hell....

There are plenty of Sikhs in that photo in the tweet. They obviously support the statue and are proud of the Sikh 'contribution' in British war efforts. Until some time last year, I was maybe the same. Through this forum I've become 'enlightened' on the reality and why I would not be one of those in the photo. 

Maybe she does not agree with it really, but as a politician maybe she knows she has to appeal to as many of the voters as possible ?

Plenty of politicians say or do things they don't agree with. 

Don't know if they agree with what they say, but more examples

 

 

Neither Dhesi or Gill tweeted on recent Republic Day from what I see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kau89r8 said:

Agree, Tan  i like time to time, he did stick up for the kissans but they can never openly support  Khalistan/ Sikh homeland, they are under constant intimidation 

Something about Tan Dhesi gives me 'untrustworthy' vibes though. Probably why he is good at playing politics. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Premi5 said:

Something about Tan Dhesi gives me 'untrustworthy' vibes though. Probably why he is good at playing politics. 

Well if anyone is 'trusting' gov/politicians, then i have nothing to say lol 

 Rami Ranger is more concerning though but i think majority know they cannot change the views of Panthic Sikhs nor will we forget 84 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use