Jump to content

Sad news about Deep Sidhu!


shastarSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/26/2022 at 7:52 PM, Kau89r8 said:

I know its his personal life..but with his family saying he was still married and his 'gf' saying been together since 2018

He also posted about her too..

Either she honey trapped him or something..but doesnt add up, also with a spinal injury you were able to fly 15 hours us next day too..odd 

 

 

1. Divorce is not allowed in Sikhi

2. Extra-marital affairs are not allowed in Sikhi

 

But who cares? He said some nice things about Bhindrawale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/20/2022 at 6:36 AM, proactive said:

You know that those how were near and close to him who were both Keshdhari and Amritdhari and even Nihangs during those Singhu border days never once said to him that he must keep his Kesh or judged him for being a Mona. They knew that everyone is on a journey to Sikhi, some take longer others not so long. The ones who felt his loss were people like Barjinder Singh Parwana who is an Amritdhari because unlike you who is quick to cast aspersions and judge a person according to whether they are Monay or Keshdhari, he lived closely with Deep Sidhu and understood him more than any of us could. Your type of Sikhi won't bring the monay back to Sikhi. 

 

 

 

Singhs pandering to monay is understandable, but I don't condone it. It is really not that different from the "liberal Sikhs" that you guys complain about nonstop pandering to the "interfaith/nonreligious" non-Sikh crowd.

"Liberal Sikhs" pander to outside groups because they feel like they are a tiny minority and they need to build bridges with the larger society in order to have any relevance and influence. Many of them feel that by supporting "interfaith Anand Karajs," for example, they are creating an opportunity for someone who is not Sikh to move closer to Sikhi and maybe one day embrace it.

Similarly, many religious Sikhs these days pander to monay because they realize that the keshdhari Sikh population is a tiny minority and they feel that they need to build bridges with monay in order to have an relevance and influence. Many of them feel that by going out of their way to embrace monay (and never, ever ask them to keep their kesh or even say anything that would hurt the feelings of the ultrasensitive monay), they will create an opportunity for them to move closer to Sikhi.

 

Personally, I think minimal standards should be upheld. I wish "liberal Sikhs" did not act so desperate, begging for acceptance from the non-Sikh crowd. And I wish more religious Sikhs did not act so desperate begging for acceptance from the "mona Sikh" crowd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use