Jump to content

Some home truths for Ravi Singh Khalsa Aid


proactive
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, proudkaur21 said:

It's our own fault for not teaching the importance of sikhi to kids since they are young. 99% of kids born from such marriages will never be khalsa ever which is why these lines have been systematically blurred. If you cant kill them through genocide completely just assimilate them slowly.

This naivety on your part that I appreciate stems from religious preachers and figureheads is why we'll end up extinct.

What pure form of Sanatan Hindu dharam was niece-fondling, racist Bald Gandhi practicing when he managed to maneuver himself into such powerful positions? What khattar form of Islam was Jinnah following when his pork and alcohol consuming self managed to wrangle a country for his co-religionists?

Yet Sikhs are expected to have the spiritual knowledge, morals, and ethics of 10 Gurus coupled with the martial prowess of Baba Deep Singh before they're even given a sniff of leadership. That's unless you happen to be a celebrity; then you be whatever you feel like as long as you dress up and get the proles over-excited at a rally.

Today's Sikhs will never be mini-Guru Sahibs and we certainly should never aspire to be nachne-tapne people. Relinquish this delusion because with every passing year we are arriving closer to the end.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jassu said:

If you cared about sikhi you would fight for it. Not leave it for other opportunities. Shameful

Let's see how much fervour you'd retain if you're experiencing systemic oppression (essentially apartheid) by your own over generations. 

If you've been economically oppressed too, you wouldn't even have the resources required for a sustained fight back.  That's probably why tarkhans are more likely than others to tell these people where to go maybe?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jassu said:

Yes but leaving the religion doesn’t make sense. Sikhi didn’t do anything wrong. People (humans) do.

When the majority are brain-dead or slavish, who exactly is someone who doesn't fall into these categories going to stand with? Will anyone with even a little self respect tolerate having 5hit talked about them by brain-dead slaves? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jassu said:

There are probably no differences in the blood of a Virk in Punjab Pakistan and a Virk in Punjab india . One is Muslim and one is a Sikh. But the Muslim one is probably posting about how great Arabs and Turks and Muslims are on Facebook and the Sikh one is probably talking about which brother to scam next for more land 

So much truth in that, that it's hilarious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

So much truth in that, that it's hilarious. 

Lol when you think about it a lot of Jatts joined sikhi because of the zamindar system. I wonder if jatts would leave sikhi if given chances for more land and money. Lmao pathetic 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

What seems INSANE to me when people say such things is that essentially it sounds like: "These other people accept slavery and oppression, people within our own society should do the same too."

It completely glosses over the fact that Sikh society emerged to combat and get away from these very things. Please think about it, you're saying that oppressed Sikhs should just quietly accept their lot. How is that going to work when the whole ethos of Sikhi is to confront and combat such oppression? And what effect does it have on people when certain people try and normalise such stank hypocrisy?     I think some just (understandably) after many generations give up on any chance of equal treatment and leave. Why not focus on changing those who are so invested in perpetuating such gross inequalities amongst our own panth?  

We are not saying that its happening there so it should be allowed in sikhi. They convert to christianity where white Christians are racist against black and brown Christians. They convert to a religion that was forced on different continents. So how are they escaping inequality? Conversion to christianity provides then benefits and money. Let's say the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, proudkaur21 said:

Our ancestors could have also chosen to give up fighting against islam rather than get their limbs cut. They chose to fight and die fighting for the truth. Why dont they stay and fight against this casteism? 

That's why you need to read that Sikh Revolution book I always plug. It goes into that. Those Singhs of those times didn't have these stank attitudes apnay today do. Do you think that that people who grew up a few generations away from the physical presence of our Gurus had backward attitudes like today?  If so, they would never have lasted against the moghuls and afghans.      

They never signed up to start fighting between their own for the very thing they joined Sikhi for. Humane treatment and dignity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use