Jump to content

Ban On Short Hair Marriages


anjaan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Gurdwara ban on short-hair marriage

PARVINDER BHATIA

Jamshedpur, March 13: Buoyed by the success of the ban imposed on jeans-clad women from entering the Gurdwara premises, the Central Gurdwara Prabhandhak Committee (CGPC) here has decided to ban Sikhs with trimmed hair from getting married at gurdwaras.

According to CGPC officials, the step has been taken to uphold the religious customs of the community. They said the decision was taken after consulting senior members of the community. CGPC has written to the heads of 23 Gurdwara prabandhak committees in the city to implement the decision.

It has also warned the committees of strict action if they were found flouting the orders. “The holy books have some directives on hair in our religion but it is sad that people, especially the youths, are shaving their beards and heads and disowning the sacred beliefs. It is essential to create an awareness among them,” said Sardar Shailendar Singh, a senior official of the CGPC.

Members, men or women, with trimmed hair will not be allowed to perform “Anand Kharaj” (a religious marriage ceremony) on the Gurdwara premises. Senior CGPC vice-president Harbhajan Singh said the decision would work as a pressure tactic on youths so that they will learn to respect their hair.

“Hair is the identity of a Sikh but it is sad that trimming of hair has become a sort of fashion among youths. We have to make them realise the importance of our beliefs. The ban will also serve an eye opener for parents,” he said.

Singh, who is also the president of Sonari Gurdwara Prabhandhak Committee said the Gurdwaras have already started implementing the decision. However, the decision taken by the central body is set to snowball into a controversy as some members have started voicing their protest.

FULL ARTICLE ON SIKHNET

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Akaal108

I strongly disagree with the division within sikh community where one side - Amridharis/keshadharis and other side- Sehajdhari and Monaie Sikhs and they are both clashing or hating with each other.

But I agree with their move because of their intentions behind this decision is not to discriminate but do parchar of Sikh Dharam ..especially in these rural areas where youths are giving up their indentity because of inferiority complex and givin up to the drugs... i mean they gotta do something..they can't just sit and do anything about this growing problem...so they decided to do this... may be it just an "experiment" they are trying to do ... if it works well as in people are coming back to the roots and learning about the great sikh history.. they should keep up this ban until they are satisfied with the numbers within the area... otherwise if this decision creates an chain reaction then they should lift up this ban otherwise it will just built momentum of hate between amritdharis and monaie which frankly nobody wants... .!

I hope this decision does not spread in all gurdwara's in india otherwise it will cause havoc...because i think this case is expectional due to circumstances but this should not be never ever in an offical sikh rehat maryada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the principle to an extent. I cut my hair for well over 18yrs, then woke up and havent cut it since december 2003. Therefore understand what the committee is saying but lets face some facts involved with this procedure.

1. You will push people away from Sikhi

2. People will get married outside of the Gurdwara

3. Preventing a sikhi, whether he has cut hair or not is wrong if in a Gurdwara to see my guru as that one visit may be the change he or she needs..

But most of all. What happened with the Respect for Guru Ji Campaign? Was this not in a similar way? Maharaj being taken to dirty places because supposedly the Gurdwara charged to much for a wedding (and obviously a hotel is charging less... <_< @ ) But point being this will only increase these types of weddings as some <banned word filter activated> is going to make money by arranging weddings in "Clean" halls and still the Anand Kharaj will go ahead.

"Quote

Defeats the whole point really.

Members, men or women, with trimmed hair will not be allowed to perform “Anand Kharaj” (a religious marriage ceremony) on the Gurdwara premises. Senior CGPC vice-president Harbhajan Singh said the decision would work as a pressure tactic on youths so that they will learn to respect their hair."

If the youth dont respect the hair now, what makes you think they will respect it after they are turned away?

Like i said, i agree with what is trying be done BUT look at the long term damage to Sikhi. If Sikhs are pushed away, what will make them want to continue Sikhi in their family (ie the next generation).

I was also told by a wise person once, the Anand Kharaj, was only performed for Amritdhari Gursikhs. If this is the case, when will this come into play again? Purely for those who are Kesh Dhari but have not yet been called to give their heads will they too be excluded?

I agree to an extent but there are long term thoughts which to be done. The action in my humble opinion needs to be reviewd.

Sorry for any offense caused.

All-Info

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sat Sri Akal:

A good measure written in piss-poor language. The youth respond to explanation and rational discussion...not threats and intimidation, which this article insinuates in the language (or perhaps it is the newspaper writer's slant on the matter, something that should not be dismissed). Youth, whenever pressured, rebel. It is their nature. However, this rebellion is only comabatted with understannding and open, friendly dialouge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello All

A sikh is a sikh, wether he has cut hair or not. I wear a turban and am proud, but I have to disagree with the ruling.

Everyone should be welcome in a Sikh temple and there should be no diference between sikhs.

We have more important issues to disguss, then upsetting fellow sikhs.

No one is perfect.

There are other ways to deal with this issue.

on the day the clean shaven person with cut hair should wear a turban and grow his beard for the occasion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the ruling, its a good step. <_<

Do you think Guru Gobind Singh Sahib would give them blessings even though the bride or groom has not followed his hukam and taken amrit? He would tell them both to become a Khalsa, only then will he give his full blessings.

Rehat pyaari mujh ko sikh pyara nahe||

If they have a hair cut and don't follow the hukam of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji, they are not a Sikh and can goto a mandir or mosque for all I care. Harsh words for a harsh reality. :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use