Jump to content

"shaking" During Naam Simran


Surinderjit
 Share

Recommended Posts

Like in that vid. :@

I've done it a few time myself, as with the motions of the naam simran being said and the "sound" of it.

Can anyone give me more info, like that is it called, if theres a better term, etc...

thanks

Surinderjit Singh

There is a difference between you making the movement and the movement happening on its own.

Simply the act of movement does not create more 'Anand' it is what causes the body to move is when you surrender your body and mind to the beat of the Music/Sound/Vibrations/Words.

But when movement does happen, get out of its way and allow it to happen and the truth of the matter is when it does happen on its own, you won't be able to stop it. You'd become an observer to the movement not the creator of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

If someone is enjoying doing naam/simran it doesnt matter how or if they are expressing them self, just let them enjoy. But on the other hand if it becomes nothing more than a habit then it could become a method in which you could lose concetration.

Fateh ji

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like in that vid. :@

I've done it a few time myself, as with the motions of the naam simran being said and the "sound" of it.

Can anyone give me more info, like that is it called, if theres a better term, etc...

thanks

Surinderjit Singh

There is a difference between you making the movement and the movement happening on its own.

Simply the act of movement does not create more 'Anand' it is what causes the body to move is when you surrender your body and mind to the beat of the Music/Sound/Vibrations/Words.

But when movement does happen, get out of its way and allow it to happen and the truth of the matter is when it does happen on its own, you won't be able to stop it. You'd become an observer to the movement not the creator of it.

good reply.

Sometimes it does happen by itself, other times its your body moving in rythm with the beat/music, and at other times its pure pakhand.

Either way, you would assume that the 'anand' which causes bodily movement is not somehow connected with the beat of the tabla. Unfortunetly for many of us it is ... the moment the fast table and fast vaheguru vaheguru stops, the heads also stop swinging and people return to their normal seated position, in a calm and collected manner .. until the next round of fast table that is!! Is this anand? or is it something else?

if maharajh says that sitting like a crane in water, or with your eyes closed etc is a pakhand if there is nothing inside, then equally jumping around and swinging your head is equally a pakhand if there is nothing going on inside.

In sri dasam granth maharajh describes how a bhagat should focus his dhiaan on vaheguru just like a hunter focuses on his prey. Once he has his target in sight of his arrow, no noise, no wind, no smell, no movement or anything will shift his attention, his whole being and mind is focused on the prey and the prey alone. But for fools like us, we sit eyes closed but they pop open every time a door opens or someone walks past us, and for the body poppers they snap out of their anand as soon as the tabla stops taking a beating or a kirtani that they dont 'like' starts doing kirtan.

How far are we from true samadhi!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I came across this video; I would request that people please reply with sensible answers, what does the Sangath feel about this video? these actions? Is it any different from the AKJ Kirtan/venue/smagam?

It’s not a question about being right or wrong; the person in the video has reacted according to what emotion has built up within him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I came across this video; I would request that people please reply with sensible answers, what does the Sangath feel about this video? these actions? Is it any different from the AKJ Kirtan/venue/smagam?

It's not a question about being right or wrong; the person in the video has reacted according to what emotion has built up within him.

WHY make a post liek that when YOU KNOW that akj kirtan darbas/rainsbhais are not like that? that video is just plain stupid, why even compare?.

In kirtan darbars people slightly move when really enjoying the kirtan or when it comes to simran, or when the simran gets a bit speedy and loud, its not a bad thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I came across this video; I would request that people please reply with sensible answers, what does the Sangath feel about this video? these actions? Is it any different from the AKJ Kirtan/venue/smagam?

It’s not a question about being right or wrong; the person in the video has reacted according to what emotion has built up within him.

is it any diiferent? oh yhh like i saw sum old man jumpin around da last time i went to a akj kirtan.

yes it is a question of right and wrong, that is wrong, dacning infront of mahraj like a clown is wrong, stupid post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"is it any diiferent? oh yhh like i saw sum old man jumpin around da last time i went to a akj kirtan.

yes it is a question of right and wrong, that is wrong, dacning infront of mahraj like a clown is wrong, stupid post"

pajji/pennjji not being bad or anything but dass and parvar have been going to rainsbai kirtans around the UK for along time and never seen people jumping up and down if they have please give exact details lik rainsbai year etc. For sikhs who want to know why people "shake" durin kirtan this link should hpefully awnser your question maff karo sangat jio if i have offended anyone.

http://akj.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3674...5ec9baf3729a805 heres the link :@:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use