Popular Post DiscoverSikhism Posted February 12, 2014 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 12, 2014 you are partly correct... this is also having a damaging affect on sangat... some radhasoamis realise that radhasoami is a backward cult... its very sad. radhaosami is a poison. I try to save as many poeple as i can. its a very hard, long and draining process to deprogram the way they think. i also agree that the newer generation of sikhs are more political then spiritual... we need to take both to the highest hight. Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh Paneer Bhaji, your posts are very valid and insightful. Humble request, please can you (or anyone else) put all your thoughts (together) in an article about the 'delusions of radhasoami's' and we will publish on our site. Historically, there would have been no radhasoami's without Sikhi. Radhasoami's want to be Sikhs (not the other way around). Many hindu's turn into radhasoami's, learn the truth and then embrace Sikhi. Seperately, we are investigating claims that radhasoami's were a British invention with a long term plan to turn Indians into Christians. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery and manmukh radhasoami's have unintentionally ended up strengthening Sikhi. They should try listening to the following and accept why Waheguru is steering them in this direction... 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Cisco_Singh Posted February 12, 2014 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 12, 2014 Those trapped in the radha-soami cult and it's warped belief set really are lost souls... Hopefully some of them develop some intelligence and do their own research and realise that their cult exists because the Indian goverment fund it and many others to cause divisions in the Sikh panth. Strange how all these indian government sponsored cults are against the Sikh sant-sipahi lifestyle and Sikh self determination. They reject the compulsory carrying of arms commanded by Guru Hargobind Maharjaj and Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji. These cults also never speak out against any injustices or human rights violations. In effect they do not believe in Guru Nanaks key message of "sarbat da bhalla" and core Sikh concepts such as upholding Dharam, fighting for the betterment and religious freedoms of all people and faiths "Dharam Yudh". These cults are simply "hippy" culture weak movements designed to mislead Sikhs and distance them from the Shakti of Guru Granth Sahib Ji, Dasam Granth and Sarbloh Granth. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayWhaaaat Posted August 13, 2014 Report Share Posted August 13, 2014 . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehtab Singh Posted August 13, 2014 Report Share Posted August 13, 2014 13.) I came here to get banned 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehtab Singh Posted August 14, 2014 Report Share Posted August 14, 2014 Edited by sayWhaaaat, Yesterday, 05:22 PM. 13.) I came here to get banned If you don't have the guts to face us even online why bother taking panga in the first place? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geo Posted August 18, 2014 Report Share Posted August 18, 2014 given that sikhs are not to refer to sggs as a book but instead a guru, how should other people refer to it? im meaning here radha soami people or christians/muslims/hindus or atheists? for example a journalist writingan article in english about the sikh religion, should he refer to it as a "sikh holy book"? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sukhjit1983 Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 Geo What's rada swami a religion ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chatanga Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 Sikhs should have a better way fo conversing with rs without it turning into a slanging match, and remember that they have the choice to follow what they want, and im sure that if they find it is the true path, then its best not to fight with them, but to use a two-way dialogue to discuss such things. the fault of sikhs turning to rs path, is the fault of sikhs primarily. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehtab Singh Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 When we are talking about our father or mother, we say "mom" or "dad", we don't say "that human being of the male gender", or "that human being of the female gender". Same way, we don't refer to Guru Sahib as book, we say Guru Sahib. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSinghnz Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 Sikhs should have a better way fo conversing with rs without it turning into a slanging match, and remember that they have the choice to follow what they want, and im sure that if they find it is the true path, then its best not to fight with them, but to use a two-way dialogue to discuss such things. the fault of sikhs turning to rs path, is the fault of sikhs primarily. Please tell us who told you that "the fault of sikhs turning to rs path, is the fault of sikhs primarily." If a scoundrel opens his own shop and mis leads gullible folks, how are the Sikhs to be faulted for this. And this cult is funded by the Indian govt to cause division among Sikhs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.