Jump to content

Couple Take Lavan Side By Side, Question Anand Karaj Sikhi


S4NGH
 Share

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know this couple to give them an explanation. Once an explanation is given they both will know how stupid and silly they were to do it. The groom says he had his boyz lined up to manhandle anyone that spoke up against his "revolutionary" ways. Now that sounds more like a threat. How more immature can this guy be.

Only thugs talk in this manner and there is no room for this kind of behavior in Sikhi. Does he really think Singhs will buy into this thuggish behavior? If I was his boy, I would have made sure he was humiliated and then told him why he was wrong. If this couple was about fighting traditions they should have fought a tradition which is not according to Sikhi. Obviously this thug is not bright enough to figure out the bride wearing red is a Hindu tradition and not a Sikh tradition as in Sikhi the bride can wear any color. Ignorance is bliss

Yeaaa buddy you really showed the Sikhs!!!!!!!!!!!! :stupidme: :stupidme: :stupidme: :stupidme:

his boys will know what to do hahaha. Let Dharamraj be the judge of his actions for only knows what will happen to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ, ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫਤਿਹ

Anand Karaj is governed by the Sikh Reht Maryada (Sikh code of conduct and conventions).

The rules cannot be changed even if one 'thinks' they are right or wrong.

The persons attending the wedding mentioned in this post have failed to understand the true meaning of Anand Karaj. The message they needed to focus on was their union with god.

We have a guide here for further reading - http://www.discoversikhism.com/sikhism/sikh_anand_karaj.html

(Shawn Singh Tucker's next trick may be to give an equal amount of births compared to his wife...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy seems like a complete <banned word filter activated> and what was his parents thinking when they named him Shawn Tucker!!!. I take it the surname is Thakar but no one spells it Tucker unless they are ashamed of their identity.

I think he misspelt his name , should be Shorn Takkar , anyway just opened his mouth and left not a single doubt just how much of a fool he really is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not agreeing with them, as they've clearly got it wrong (and clearly much of the disaproval here should be directed at that Gurdwara in Atlanta that sanctioned it rather than the 2 individuals that didn't know better) but I do see the point they wanted to make, albeit in the wrong way. I don't see how the Hindu marriage custom of the male leading the female around is compatible with Sikhi, just as I don't see how the Hindu custom of the male being the protector of the female is compatible with Sikhi (Rakhri). Perhaps the bride should lead the male around ? After all, that is what is going to happen to him every day for the rest of his life from now on, so he might as well get used to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not agreeing with them, as they've clearly got it wrong (and clearly much of the disaproval here should be directed at that Gurdwara in Atlanta that sanctioned it rather than the 2 individuals that didn't know better) but I do see the point they wanted to make, albeit in the wrong way. I don't see how the Hindu marriage custom of the male leading the female around is compatible with Sikhi, just as I don't see how the Hindu custom of the male being the protector of the female is compatible with Sikhi (Rakhri). Perhaps the bride should lead the male around ?

brother do some research before you agree with thugs. Gurbani tells us the woman makes a request to the man to take her in marriage. Making it the woman walks behind the man. i believe the pankti is on ang 936. this pankti is read at Anand karaj but of course our people don't understand Gurbani, so we have people like this couple making a mockery of Gurbani.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use