Jump to content

Punjabi Girls Bad Behaviour


singh598
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2
On 5/30/2017 at 4:14 PM, Singh1989 said:

QUESTION! Where are the Sikh girls? I see no Kara let alone dastaar n "Kaur" being mentioned in names.

I did give a +1, but nowhere in the true Maryada does it say women have to wear Keski. About the Kara, I have no idea, maybe it's a Sindhi Hindu?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

I did give a +1, but nowhere in the true Maryada does it say women have to wear Keski. About the Kara, I have no idea, maybe it's a Sindhi Hindu?

Or maybe not Sikh/ Punjabi AT ALL!!! These girls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Preeet said:

Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh, ji

I don't think that girl is Sikh (might just be a troll).. Not all jats are Sikhs btw. Just look at what she said here:

Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh

No, she's no troll. I just perused her Twitter. She seems to be a self-hating, hard-Left, admittedly politically active British Punjabi girl. Probably raised in a family that thinks very little of orthodox Sikhi. A product of her environment. An agnostic at best. A Corbynista, too. Tries to "keep it real" but is painfully middle class. Mum probably has a drink with dad down the pub; that makes her an emancipated, sophisticated woman in her daughter's eyes. Hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/2/2017 at 0:53 AM, MisterrSingh said:

No, she's no troll. I just perused her Twitter. She seems to be a self-hating, hard-Left, admittedly politically active British Punjabi girl. Probably raised in a family that thinks very little of orthodox Sikhi. A product of her environment. An agnostic at best. A Corbynista, too. Tries to "keep it real" but is painfully middle class. Mum probably has a drink with dad down the pub; that makes her an emancipated, sophisticated woman in her daughter's eyes. Hilarious.

Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
On 6/1/2017 at 7:53 PM, MisterrSingh said:

No, she's no troll. I just perused her Twitter. She seems to be a self-hating, hard-Left, admittedly politically active British Punjabi girl. Probably raised in a family that thinks very little of orthodox Sikhi. A product of her environment. An agnostic at best. A Corbynista, too. Tries to "keep it real" but is painfully middle class. Mum probably has a drink with dad down the pub; that makes her an emancipated, sophisticated woman in her daughter's eyes. Hilarious.

The same could actually happen in some hard-core Gursikh families, where the kids just break down for some odd reason. The only difference is the one from the hard-core Orthodox types will not be open about their downfalls. We as a faith-based people rarely talk about actual faith or even values, and most of our topics include stuff that's external. If someone was interested in finding about Gursikhi, odds are they'd have a better chance finding it by simply Gur-prassad and their own endeavor over the currently Post-Singh-Sahba Movement run Gurdwaras. Basically for a faith, until we realize that we must honor and respect those who value the faith, over someone with a fancy political title, (again fault of Singh Sabha), and someone who has true love for their Guru, we will continue going down-hill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

If someone was interested in finding about Gursikhi, odds are they'd have a better chance finding it by simply Gur-prassad and their own endeavor...

From my experience, that's the kind of religion that sticks with a person for life. It comes from within; an inner realisation or awakening without any inducements or threats to adhere. That type of "enlightenment" is true religion in my humble opinion. Unfortunately for the vast majority, such moments require a certain type of personality or a unique set of circumstances to bear fruit, and those instances are few and far between in your average Punjabi lifetime. 

I suppose there's a need to be pragmatic (the numbers game for social and political reasons) as well as the need to never forget one of the chief aims of existence; that Truth is all that matters to the Creator, and it transcends all petty and inconsequential human issues. Marrying these two often disparate ideologies is the true struggle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

From my experience, that's the kind of religion that sticks with a person for life. It comes from within; an inner realisation or awakening without any inducements or threats to adhere. That type of "enlightenment" is true religion in my humble opinion. Unfortunately for the vast majority, such moments require a certain type of personality or a unique set of circumstances to bear fruit, and those instances are few and far between in your average Punjabi lifetime. 

I suppose there's a need to be pragmatic (the numbers game for social and political reasons) as well as the need to never forget one of the chief aims of existence; that Truth is all that matters to the Creator, and it transcends all petty and inconsequential human issues. Marrying these two often disparate ideologies is the true struggle.

I agree with most of this; however, as a group of people I don't think we,(Punjabis), are the best at helping each other out with our problems being sorted out. If someone wanted to find answers, they'd probably be more lost then when they started. Also we have this terrible idealist ideas and when many Sikhs see someone who's Amritdhari, we automatically assume they are perfectly content.

Something the less devout in any religious community ackwolegde which I feel will benefit well is they realize that their children will be imperfect, wheras you have those hardcores of any faith expecting only the best of the best, and the problem people get is that these parents haven't taught the love of Vaheguru, God, or whatever they believe in, but rather they have taught their kids a dangerous idea, and that is: "Follow these rules, or else". If you ask me that's probably going to lead to a  moral decay then someone being liberal hippy do-da, because whereas the libreals just be real with being terrible excuses for a human being, the other one will act religious for "show-and-tell", but probably inolved in much worse stuff. (This is completely different from someone doing their best, and still lacking, those who put the effort and still fail, I can respect, but those who pretend to be perfect and fail have no excuse).

Also many hard-core religious parents just have to realize that their kid is not going to some universal savior, (I'm talking about accepting it at heart not just saying they know that), some religious people I know really expect an unrealistic standard for some other people. (Not just talking about Sikhs, but religious people in general).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes that was original Granth by Guru Arjan Dev in 1604. The original one still exists. 10th Guru added 116 hymns of his father. This is called copy of Damdama and declared Guru.  
    • Isn't there Adi Granth as well?
    • 1) Guru Granth Sahib with 5,894 hymns. (Note this Granth was given Guruship). It has 1430 pages. Granths by Guru Gobind Singh :-  2) Dasam Granth with 17,293 verses in 1428 pages. 3) Sarbloh Granth in 4,361 stanzas 862 pages in print. There are number of other works by various poets like Suraj Parkash, Bhai Gurdas and Nand Lal.
    • Man just learn boxing or take a shastar training. You don't have a 2 foot talwar or khanda in 2025's Western World. Today ur either gonna get stabbed (uk), shot (America) or attacked by a meth head (Punjab) in street fights. By the time u draw the sword that guy's got you on the floor probably searching your Kacherra for coins lol Only good thing he did was the Loh Mushti video (boxing with the kara as a knuckleduster) but even then just get a normal knuckleduster if you can. Though before ANYTHING any Sikh interested in martial arts has to train two things as the bare minimum: UNARMED FIGHTING (boxing preferably) and KIRPAN TRAINING. Loh Mushti is good but only when you lost ur kirpan somehow in a fight (which shouldn't rlly happen if you train on how to use it. If the bad guys wanna use knives n guns then the Khalsa who's here to stop em has to better at their own game than them. NO Sikh in America has an excuse not to own a gun, and if their state allows public carry they should be the first to accept it.
    • Sikhs have missed the point: Shastar Vidhiya means "the science of (hand-held) weapons", not just the style nihangs do or gatka. Gatka and "shastar vidhiya" are "bad" for 2 reasons: You can't actually practice them properly cos its deadly. Same issue with karate; you can't free spar full force with traditional techniques cos someone'd probably die, so its impracticality goes unchecked. But boxing spars full force, so you know what works. And if you ever do have to defend someone w gatka and the thug has a stick too (unlikely) you wouldn't know how to take a full force hit cos in training you had to take it light. That one hit will shake you more than you realise and probably make u lose if ur not used to it.  You likely don't carry a 2 foot sword/gatka stick in the West unless going to training. And a thug doesn't either; he's got a knife (uk) or a gun (USA . Gatka may beat knife, but even field hockey sticks will beat someone with a normal knife cos of reach, gatka di lorh nhi haegi specifically. But if they got a gun, the only defence is quicker draw time and better aim (which you'll learn at shooting class, never at gatka) Basically, Guru Gobind Singh Ji told us to learn "the science of weapons" to defend people, but we train an art with a weapon nobody carries today (nobody takes a gatka stick when they step out to get atta) and one that we can never spar with fully and thus we don't even know what it feels like to get hit with it properly. If you train to preserve history or perform shows, then that's fine. But it's NOT part of a Sikh's military training anymore and won't help you much in fights (for which we must be "tyaar by tyaar" , always ready).  (PS: Gatka may have a few skills like movement and observation that can help in fights, but all its practical stuff like that is also in MMA, plus much more. Nothing that's exclusive to arts like gatka will help practically).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use