Jump to content

Kashmir - who does it belong to?


Big_Tera
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, GuestSingh said:

look my post was based on history. real life events, geopolitics n cold-truths. u can c the aforementioned oppression online for urself.

n my support is for gd sikhs bk home in panjab. so neither side here have my support given their history aganst sikhs. both have been n still r against sikhs. so whose side r u on? wats ur reason for pickin hindus over muslims?

as a hindu bahman, we expect u to favour these ppl. maybe even try to defend em, play dwn their atrocities n deflect any negative attention away from it. tht explains y ur post sounds exactly like wat a pro hindu nationalist wud say commenting on something like khalistan. uve either learnt well or ur one of em urself?

we knw wat happens to minorities on muslim land. its the same as minorities livin on hindu land. violence, oppression n murder in different ways. 

seein as both countries like to either rip their land apart or join it together by force, the earlier post tht suggested j&k be partitioned wiv each country claiming their majority populations region sounds like the solution.

'india' hasnt got much face to save anyway given their past. if the hindu elite couldnt defend themselves then they begged to their masters for benefits/jobs. like a little puppy on a leash for a treat. embarrassing.

This forum and countless forums are littered with Hindu RSS Agents.  They are infiltrating multiple Sikh platforms whether they be online or in the physical world.  Call them out challenge their lies with factual information.  If you encounter one in the real world, give them ‘Chittar Parade’ that will make their future generations chant ‘Khalistan Zindabad’ into the 22nd century.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

The army treats Kashmiris with respect. Yes they may be minor incidents of infringement here and there. But they only retaliate when they are attacked with stones and have to defend themselves.  Have you forgotton about palawama already? 

You sound like a wannabe muslim even though your nothing but an infidel to them. With your support for the suleh. 

If pakistan takes kashmir what will happen to non muslims there? You think they will be treated good?

Wake up and stop being a sulah a$$ licker. 

Did he say Pakistan should get Kashmir?  I missed it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chatanga1 said:

The conflict started in 1948 and has continued up to today. There has been three outright wars but continuing skirmishes in between. Then in 1984 there has been outright rebellion.

How can taking away the last pillar of support the Kashmeris had bring about  everlasting peace?

 

 

 

Because India's record of extrajudicial killings and rapes will be exposed to the world. At the moment they maintain it being an "internal matter" so they don't have to be exposed.

 

Also there is the very strong possibility that india will be deemed to denying the Kashmeris their right to self-determination which is upheld in the Basic Charter of Human Rights as enshrined in the UN.

 

I didn't read anything else after this line in your post. Next you will say that Aurangzeb treated Guru Tegh Bahahadur Ji with respect and Wazir Khan treated Sahibzadas with respect.

I can't believe that Sikhs have thinking like this at this time when the ease of information is at our fingertips.

 

 

 

I don't know why, but whenever you open your mouth it seems like you haven't engaged your brain. I mean, like, ALL the time. What is wrong with you?

These are not Sikhs lands. SIkhs took them in  battle and conquest like they took Peshawar and Khyber. Do you seriously count Peshawar and Khyber as greater Sikh lands?

Why are you spreading misonformation on this board?

OK my point is the area of the world these hinduvta busybodies want to claim as their birthright when

They never were born there

They did zero to defend these lands at anypoint in history

the only reason Ladakh and other areas which were acquired by Maharaja Ranjit Singh 's armies ended up as being part of India is through trechary and brownnosing of Dogrey , and Ladakh forms rhe majority of the land encircled by the state line, of course no mention of their land by name  and forget about protection of buddhists rights as those are being diminished and controlled by the army day by day much as in himachal.(Seen with own eyes on recent visit).

Anybody claiming army respecting sikhs nd muslims in these regions have not been paying attention to the news coming out of there. The army stationed there are raping females maiming boys, men and children with shot injuries, disappearences and encounters abound , they are living through their genocide years.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AGAIN!  Again you show your ignorance! It's like you do no reading, no research but have to have an opinion on everything. 

General Zorawar Singh who captured Ladakh for the Sikh kingdom was a hindu. The force that captured it was Dogra. 

It was even rumoured that the Sikh governor of Kashmir unhappy at Zorawars conquests tried to set him up in a trap in Ladakh hut Zorawar was too astute. 

Can you please stop just adding false information on this board?

I hope you are not like this with your family. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, chatanga1 said:

AGAIN!  Again you show your ignorance! It's like you do no reading, no research but have to have an opinion on everything. 

General Zorawar Singh who captured Ladakh for the Sikh kingdom was a hindu. The force that captured it was Dogra. 

It was even rumoured that the Sikh governor of Kashmir unhappy at Zorawars conquests tried to set him up in a trap in Ladakh hut Zorawar was too astute. 

Can you please stop just adding false information on this board?

I hope you are not like this with your family. 

That occured after angrez smart alec, under raja Gulab singh dogra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/9/2019 at 4:13 AM, chatanga1 said:

The conflict started in 1948 and has continued up to today. There has been three outright wars but continuing skirmishes in between. Then in 1984 there has been outright rebellion.

How can taking away the last pillar of support the Kashmeris had bring about  everlasting peace?

 

 

 

Because India's record of extrajudicial killings and rapes will be exposed to the world. At the moment they maintain it being an "internal matter" so they don't have to be exposed.

 

Also there is the very strong possibility that india will be deemed to denying the Kashmeris their right to self-determination which is upheld in the Basic Charter of Human Rights as enshrined in the UN.

 

I didn't read anything else after this line in your post. Next you will say that Aurangzeb treated Guru Tegh Bahahadur Ji with respect and Wazir Khan treated Sahibzadas with respect.

I can't believe that Sikhs have thinking like this at this time when the ease of information is at our fingertips.

 

 

 

I don't know why, but whenever you open your mouth it seems like you haven't engaged your brain. I mean, like, ALL the time. What is wrong with you?

These are not Sikhs lands. SIkhs took them in  battle and conquest like they took Peshawar and Khyber. Do you seriously count Peshawar and Khyber as greater Sikh lands?

Why are you spreading misonformation on this board?

Pakistan has been waging a proxy war against India in Kashmir as it has no chance of victory by waging a conventional war.

Even during the Kargil conflict Pakistan lied about freedom fighters having entered Indian side of LOC. Later on Pakistan had to publicly admit it is a terrorist state when it was proven that it was their army which had infiltrated the borders.

The humiliating defeat Pakistan suffered is something they can never forget.

Our bravehearts gave the ultimate sacrifice to win this war and all previous wars against Pakistan.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is India can easily win any war with pakistan. 

But they cant defend against suicide bombs and terrorists. 

Pakistan have a atrocious record of supporting terrorist. 

Look at the Taj bombings in mumbai. 

India should all unite against this scum people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use