Jump to content

Gurdwara looted/Sikh man found dead in Kashmir


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, ChardikalaUK said:

That's very bad on our part. We should not form any alliance with muslims even if it is just to spite the Hindus. Muslims are very dangerous to our community. They will kidnap our girls if they can get away with it.

They already have chief of the groomers and kidnappers was the chief minister of kashmir omar abdullah who married a sikh woman converted her to islam and had kids with her.

Some of these Sikhs are so low IQ its embarrassing, they actually offering their daughters and sisters to the islamists with fake one way brotherhood. Not having the balls to tell non-sikh hostile communities to do one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ChardikalaUK said:

That's very bad on our part. We should not form any alliance with muslims even if it is just to spite the Hindus. Muslims are very dangerous to our community. They will kidnap our girls if they can get away with it.

We shud be kind and helpful to both Muslims and Hindus.

But our first priority shud be Sikhs and that's where our daswandh shud go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mmm. Makes me think of being centered, or balanced. First one is centered, and self determined, capable of providing for and protecting one's self, and through abundance, others. Then one can collaborate within the small family group which in turn should have that same foundation grounded in the same values and as such be prepared to collaborate with other like minded family groups. 

So the individual Sikh and the entire Sikh Paanth should be taken care of from the ground up, by itself, for itself, to such an abundant degree...that it can then provide even for outsiders if called to. 

So selfish and selfless virtues must be in balance, starting with self determined abundance. Which seems to be where the Paanth is failing. 

All aid as far as we can tell is only being given to outsiders, and major organizations have heavily influenced and corrupted...infiltrated and maligned  the greater Paanthic organizations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The goal seems to be to drive the Sikhs out of the valley so it is just muslims left?

However, what does this mean?

It could be that GOI is cutting it's losses and consolidating?

Or it emboldens the Jihadis to attack Jammu and Ladakh?

It could mean Hindutva have now isolated the muslims and there is no kafir collateral damage?

The goal seems to be drive the non-muslims out thats pretty clear therefore its an islamist/pakistani isi agenda because the Sikhs are not rising to the bait and hitting back at the moment. If we saw Sikhs hitting back and regularly we can say pro-india agent provocateurs or Sikhs are being funded by some agencies but there is no movement at the moment. The islamists did the same to hindu's of kashmir and india didnt help arm the hindu's to defend themselves. We can see the condition of afghan Sikhs and pakistani sikhs.

Imagine if it was the indian govt behind it all and all the non-muslims were genocided and ethnically cleansed from afghanistan, pakistan and kashmir as the trends has been since 1947. what is it they would have to gain? only if Sikhs had reacted after chattisinghpora we could say the indian govt is behind it but now its been quite a few attacks and no reactions except the covert slow migration of afghan,  pakistani and kashmiri sikhs to india.

Do we really think they are behind it when if non-muslims are gone from those lands that suddenly the islamists will just stop there? what objective will india have achieved? or will the islamists start then going into indian punjab? particularly border area's where jammu and kashmir meets punjab as has been the case with attacks on indian airbase in pathankot.

On balance of big probability I can safely conclude it was the islamists.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, proactive said:

His wife was Payal Nath who was a Hindu. Apparently he is now having any affair with Nidhi Razdan, the NDTV anchor who is a Hindu Kashmiri. 

In most of the articles I read it says her father is sikh and she was Sikh just because her dad and she may have hindu names doesn't mean shes hindu. Either way there's been quite a few cases where Sikh girls been harassed and groomed and even forced to convert to islam by muslims in kashmir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use