Gurdwara looted/Sikh man found dead in Kashmir

[Kau89r8]

 

[genie]

All we need to know about what the islamists in pakistan think of Sikhs and sikhi

 

 

[dharamyudh]

Vaheguru. 

[Ranjeet01]

55 minutes ago, genie said:

The goal seems to be drive the non-muslims out thats pretty clear therefore its an islamist/pakistani isi agenda because the Sikhs are not rising to the bait and hitting back at the moment. If we saw Sikhs hitting back and regularly we can say pro-india agent provocateurs or Sikhs are being funded by some agencies but there is no movement at the moment. The islamists did the same to hindu's of kashmir and india didnt help arm the hindu's to defend themselves. We can see the condition of afghan Sikhs and pakistani sikhs.

Imagine if it was the indian govt behind it all and all the non-muslims were genocided and ethnically cleansed from afghanistan, pakistan and kashmir as the trends has been since 1947. what is it they would have to gain? only if Sikhs had reacted after chattisinghpora we could say the indian govt is behind it but now its been quite a few attacks and no reactions except the covert slow migration of afghan,  pakistani and kashmiri sikhs to india.

Do we really think they are behind it when if non-muslims are gone from those lands that suddenly the islamists will just stop there? what objective will india have achieved? or will the islamists start then going into indian punjab? particularly border area's where jammu and kashmir meets punjab as has been the case with attacks on indian airbase in pathankot.

On balance of big probability I can safely conclude it was the islamists.

 

 

It seems to me that whoever really runs India is not only anti-Sikh but anti-Hindu too.

It looks like there is coordinated plan by the Islamic, Christians and Marxists  to carve up the subcontinent between themselves before they turn on each other.

The dharmics will need to fight back. If we do, we will win.

It is only our mental state that is preventing us, we lack the ruthlessness. The Abrahamics expect us to be dharmic. For dharma to prevail, one has to sometimes be adharmic.

We can defeat them but what will happen is they will revert back to taqqiya and hudabaiya tactics, that will be the time to be even more ruthless.

 

[genie]

20 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

It seems to me that whoever really runs India is not only anti-Sikh but anti-Hindu too.

It looks like there is coordinated plan by the Islamic, Christians and Marxists  to carve up the subcontinent between themselves before they turn on each other.

The dharmics will need to fight back. If we do, we will win.

It is only our mental state that is preventing us, we lack the ruthlessness. The Abrahamics expect us to be dharmic. For dharma to prevail, one has to sometimes be adharmic.

We can defeat them but what will happen is they will revert back to taqqiya and hudabaiya tactics, that will be the time to be even more ruthless.

 

I dont think the are abrahamics are ones who run india i think the ones who really rule are adharmic atheists types who use religions to suit their needs.

and your right about the need to be adharmic and last time that happened Sikhs were able to get rule. Sad reality of this world and existence in order to get political power or stop being genocided yourself you have to be ruthless and adharmi at times too to stop your own people getting exterminated.

From my analysis the only thing preventing Sikhs from reacting violently at the moment is betrayal from fellow Sikhs. We learn't from 1984 that the Sikhs themselves were indian agents working part of the indian establishments agenda. Theres cases going through indian courts right now where akali dali members of punjab Parliament were convicted of killing innocent civilians who they later blamed on sant bhindranwale and gave the indian state justification to attack darbar sahib. But some how these same people survived all the state violence and eventually got selected by akali dali for political power?

This is why no one trusts akali dal and any jathabandi any more because we dont know whose working for who. But what we do know is anyone killing innocent civilians is defo not working for the interests of the sikh community and defo some governments agents.

[puzzled]

Your average sikh in punjab probably has hardly had much contact with a muslim tbh  muslims make only around 1% of punjabs population.  The Sikhs that witnessed the partition are now really old or dead. So sikhs in pubjab have no ide what it is like living with muslims when their population is large.

Your average sikh in punjab has probably just spoken to kashmiri carpet sellers and gujjars and that's it.

Hindus on the other hand in places like UP  know what it's like living with a sizable muslim population, the hindus in Bengal know, delhi, etc   same with the Buddhist in Myanmar and us sikhs in the west, basically anyone anywhere in the world where there is a large muslim population knows what it's like! 

Whenever sikhs in punjab see acts of violence against muslims in other states they get all defensive of the muslims because they have no idea what it is like living with a large muslim population.  That's why sikhs in Malerkotla were protesting against the caa

Once the population of muslims is a big minority in punjab only then will they know what it's like.

Until then there really is not much you can do  Other than wait for them to experience it themselves. 

[genie]

34 minutes ago, puzzled said:

Your average sikh in punjab probably has hardly had much contact with a muslim tbh  muslims make only around 1% of punjabs population.  The Sikhs that witnessed the partition are now really old or dead. So sikhs in pubjab have no ide what it is like living with muslims when their population is large.

Your average sikh in punjab has probably just spoken to kashmiri carpet sellers and gujjars and that's it.

Hindus on the other hand in places like UP  know what it's like living with a sizable muslim population, the hindus in Bengal know, delhi, etc   same with the Buddhist in Myanmar and us sikhs in the west, basically anyone anywhere in the world where there is a large muslim population knows what it's like! 

Whenever sikhs in punjab see acts of violence against muslims in other states they get all defensive of the muslims because they have no idea what it is like living with a large muslim population.  That's why sikhs in Malerkotla were protesting against the caa

Once the population of muslims is a big minority in punjab only then will they know what it's like.

Until then there really is not much you can do  Other than wait for them to experience it themselves. 

your right about that we can also see that with whites and sikhs who live in america, canada and well off spacey well to do parts of the UK where they have very little interaction with muslim ghettos in large numbers. These people tend have quite favorable views of islam and muslims but the whites and Sikhs who actually live in parts dominated by muslims know the score. They see how muslims subjudgate and look down upon non-muslims and its those Sikhs who show us the glimpse of the future of minorities once muslims take over areas and lands.

[puzzled]

Not sure how accurate this is 

 

[puzzled]

If this is accurate then sikhs had a very high growth/birth rate in the 60s till the mid 70s and then the growth rate started declining. 

 

[genie]

24 minutes ago, puzzled said:

Not sure how accurate this is 

 

Not sure if thats accurate it went into figures of 2020 in the future predictions.

Punjab seems to have a quite high population of muslims which is quite surprising if you take the number of Sikhs in all of pakistan is just 10,000 to 20,000 Sikhs. Judging by that video number of registered muslims is around 600,000 in indian punjab alone.