Jump to content

BLM or alllivesmatter?


Big_Tera
 Share

Recommended Posts

In her defence, Mahmoud was gang-raped during her investigations into Indian human rights abuses against Sikhs. While she has no firm evidence of who was ultimately responsible, she claims Indian police and their lackeys on the ground had followed and intimidated her prior to the rape. She refused to drop the research for her book after her ordeal, so I don't know, maybe she isn't all bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

In her defence, Mahmoud was gang-raped during her investigations into Indian human rights abuses against Sikhs. While she has no firm evidence of who was ultimately responsible, she claims Indian police and their lackeys on the ground had followed and intimidated her prior to the rape. She refused to drop the research for her book after her ordeal, so I don't know, maybe she isn't all bad?

She had not even started anything on the Sikhs.  She had finished her other research on tribes.  After a dinner she was walking home and she was gang rapped.  She equates the rape because she had brought up the topic of research of the Sikhs to an Indian researcher.  

Its not black or white.  There could be various reasons on how she got it wrong.  If I was going to blame sikh seperatists of killing innocent Hindus, I would get my fact straight before barking.  I surely wouldn't rely on one source.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

She had not even started anything on the Sikhs.  She had finished her other research on tribes.  After a dinner she was walking home and she was gang rapped.  She equates the rape because she had brought up the topic of research of the Sikhs to an Indian researcher.  

Its not black or white.  There could be various reasons on how she got it wrong.  If I was going to blame sikh seperatists of killing innocent Hindus, I would get my fact straight before barking.  I surely wouldn't rely on one source.  

It's definitely murky. Difficult to know who to trust. 

I think the issue is some Sikhs find it hard to believe that Singhs wanted to kill innocents, whereas others are willing to pin everything on Singhs regardless of truth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone ask her which village, names, description of the so called sikh seperatists?  Did anyone go to the village and ask did these guys live here ever, who are their parents, siblings, etc.  Its very easy to track people down in india because in those days Sikh families lived in the same village for decades.   Sant ji slapped his cousin for reading raagmala at Sri Akal Takht Sahib.  Those who lived with sant ji and survived the initial attack on the Sikhs would have delivered justice to those who killed innocent people (hindus).  Majority of the people who doubt Sikhs with Sant ji's thinking have never lived or seen how these Sikhs live.  There dedication to Gurmat is unbearable to the general Sikh because all they do is read Gurbani and seva.  General Sikhs like their fun time, going out, partying, etc.  These Sikhs will have none of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am in big dilemma.  As we all know that waheguru ji everywhere. I also understand that it is important to go to gurudwara sahib as well. My question is that if i do ardaas at home or any other place other than  gurudwara sahib, will it be heard and acknowledged by guru sahib or it is always important to go to gurudwara sahib and do ardaas at gurudwara sahib for guru sahib to acknowledge it? I always do path and ardaas at home in front of harmandir sahib photo or hazur sahib photo  and then for important things i make a list and go to gurudwara sahib to do the ardaas there because i think that if i do ardaas in front of guru granth sahib then it will be more accepted by guru sahib. On the other hand i think that if i am doing ardaas in front of harmandir sahib or hazur sahib photo and redoing the same ardaas at gurudwara sahib, i feel that i am not respecting the authority of harmandir sahib or hazur sahib. Because of all this, I wait to find a quite time at gurudwara sahib when there is less or no sangat  so that I can open my list and read and do ardaas spend 10-15 minutes on average to do ardaas. If there are lot of people, i can't do ardaas due to people in the lineup and I don't want to block access to them while i am spending so much time doing ardaas. If i leave without doing ardaas then i am embarrassed, disappointed and sad and then OCD kicks in. Kindly help!    
    • Play/do gurbani, simran and keertan often, make sure you do your nitnem, use sarbloh and wear sarbloh!
    • process is to find a vichola and then the vichola talks between your family and theirs. The process should be similar to how rishta is done in India side!
    • No. If you read the histroy of Guru jis' times and even centuries later, usually marriages were done in childhood. Then when they were old enough to start their grihast jeevan partnership, the bride is brought over to her husbands's house in muklawa ceremony. 4-5 years engagement is silly. You get Anand Karaj now, and then after university she you do muklawa, that is much more in the guidelines!
    • you need to explain that even the devtay kept their kes, and is a part of the ancestors' culture, that sikhi is also preserving the kshatriya and dharmik cultures!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use