Jump to content

Hindustani wishing 1984 on Sikhs


Kau89r8
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, proudkaur21 said:

grew up in the city and dont even expect anything from the city sikhs. Only ones that have some anakh are a few rural ones.

They are more like the typical Jatt gangster wannabes that end up turning their lives when they get back to Sikhi and become khrakus types 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kau89r8 said:

Since 47, we've lost alot man..i think apne just get caught up with their egos and Poonjabi Jatt music, inflate their egos, pics of Sant Ji and Khrakus Music and waving flags 'im punjabi not indian', yet cant really get to grips how much we have loss since 47 to 84...and dont want to learn reflect what we need to do for the future. 

100%. We run to goras country and wave khalistan flags. No wonder people laugh at us. Then we talk about loving punjab all the while running away from it. All of us are just talk no action. The real ones are those fighting back home not us. The ones going to jail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shastarSingh said:

Many Sindhi Hindus hv become Sikhs.

Bagri Rajasthani Hindus in sindh hv started becoming sikhs too.

Now the question is why Sikhs hv not been able to convert Hindus in India to Sikhism?

1. We never tried or had a strategy to do so. It's only due to kisan andolan that we hv realized the potential of jaats coming into Sikhism.

2. We hv completely given up simran. We hv become even more mayadhari than fellow Indian people. We are running after money and dollars and parcharaks and brahmgyani babaas are also doing the same.

Sikhi brother, not Sikhism, please

Notice as well, when we act nobly and bravely, it makes people want to convert. When we act arrogantly and haughtily towards others, they want us to die in 84 type genocides. 

I think Sikhi has been suppressed from the colonial era (where they pushed some twisted version of 'Sikhism') and that we've become infected by that vacuum. I think now is the time for things to change, and we become more sophisticated and outwardly expansive in a tactful and respectful way. We have to believe in it ourselves though, if you've got some mixed up, confused identity half-Sikh, half-caste and excessively regional too (and I say that as a Panjabi), how are you going to  teach anyone else - especially a nonPanjabi nonSikh? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Sikhi brother, not Sikhism, please

Notice as well, when we act nobly and bravely, it makes people want to convert. When we act arrogantly and haughtily towards others, they want us to die in 84 type genocides. 

I think Sikhi has been suppressed from the colonial era (where they pushed some twisted version of 'Sikhism') and that we've become infected by that vacuum. I think now is the time for things to change, and we become more sophisticated and outwardly expansive in a tactful and respectful way. We have to believe in it ourselves though, if you've got some mixed up, confused identity half-Sikh, half-caste and excessively regional too (and I say that as a Panjabi), how are you going to  teach anyone else - especially a nonPanjabi nonSikh? 

But we get emotional and attached to punjab because it is our homeland and being exploited and also the fact that it should be sikhi's epicenter just like mecca . So i dont think its bad to be attached to punjab as a sikh? Just like you see christians obsessed with Jerusalem because it is the birthplace of their religion. If punjab wasnt in this state i dont think we would talk about it constantly to this extent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, proudkaur21 said:

But we get emotional and attached to punjab because it is our homeland and being exploited and also the fact that it should be sikhi's epicenter just like mecca . So i dont think its bad to be attached to punjab as a sikh? Just like you see christians obsessed with Jerusalem because it is the birthplace of their religion. If punjab wasnt in this state i dont think we would talk about it constantly to this extent.

I get that, I'm emotionally attached to it too. But I'm just saying, if we're going to start mass conversions, we have to get away from that brash, obnoxious, supercilious, loud mouthed Panjabi characteristic too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

Many Sindhi Hindus hv become Sikhs.

Bagri Rajasthani Hindus in sindh hv started becoming sikhs too.

Now the question is why Sikhs hv not been able to convert Hindus in India to Sikhism?

1. We never tried or had a strategy to do so. It's only due to kisan andolan that we hv realized the potential of jaats coming into Sikhism.

2. We hv completely given up simran. We hv become even more mayadhari than fellow Indian people. We are running after money and dollars and our parcharaks and brahmgyani babaas are also doing the same.

Bagri Hindus started becoming Sikhs in Pakistan since decades, its not a recent phenomena. The Nanakpanthi Sindhis and Christians coming en masse to Sikhi (saroop wise for Sindhis) has been more of a recent thing (lets say posts 2000s).
We should not forget that a majority of Pak Christians are Dalits as well and conversion to Christianity did not help them uplift their status in society, while they're seeing multiple benefits of becoming Sikhs. Therefore proper initiatives would be good to give out tailor made parchar (it has to be slightly different per target group, just like the Gurus using different metaphors to explain Sikhi when talking to a farmer, priest or trader in Gurbani). 

You'd be surprised to know that many Sikhs who stayed back in Pak adopted Christianity instead of becoming Muslims. I've met many such Pak Christians with Sikh ancestry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Been so much nindya and attacking Shastarvidiya since the 2000s, however if we look at gatka now it's still mostly as poor and poorly taught as it was back then, still morris dancing moves and still behzti moves in BBC shows about sikhi and vaisakhi. If people were going to attack shastarvidiya, wouldn't have made sense to improve gatka instead and make it more effective? Additionally, the Nihang Singh presence has improved greatly now, and the cracks within the the SGPC and affiliated jatha jathebandis are showing more greatly as panth becomes more knowledgable with dasam bani and itihas day-by-day, so much gyaan which was lost within panjabi sikhs during colonial times. In the 2000s, the groups were able to talk down this bani and  gyaan by associating it with  RSS and hindus, brahminwaad etc. Not working so well now is it? However with gyaan it would be also good for us to try and preserve our martial arts and keertan vidiya as well! More and more crazy keertan videos are coming out from jatha members that are being made fun of and making sangat annoyed and upset, on tiktok and instagram reels.  
    • Author Posted April 24   On 4/21/2025 at 2:43 PM, ipledgeblue said: sirr should not be nanga because keski is usually worn.   Sikhs can sleep nanga-sirr if they choose to . Being from Punjab, almost every Sardaarji i know (amritdhari or not) sleeps/showers with their hair uncovered. I don't think Guru Sahib asked us to wear Dastar to sleep and I don't think it is in SRM.   The idea of "keski being worn to sleep" is cos in Bollywood films (Bachna Ae Haseeno) Sikh characters usually tie a gol parna when sleeping since the actor's usually Hindu. So they gotta cover his head somehow or he'd have cut hair. Same reason Diljit wore a pagg to bed in the El Sueno vid. Only time they didn't do that was in Gadar with Sunny Deol which just looked odd tbh   What in the world? What sikh or even a decent human would base their knowledge of their culture or religion on a movie industry, that too Bollywood?  Believe me, no sikh ever said, I must cover my head becasue an actor did so in a movie. I've been doing it all wrong, I must start covering mh head because the sikh in that movie did.  Just because every panjabi and sardaar you know, does something, also doesn't make it right..  Follow the guru. And if you have a medical condition, then exemptions can be made.  Just admit it, because of my medical condition, I am not able to follow this rehit. Why are you getting everyone else to drop to your level?
    • Wasn't Guru Arjan Dev's martyrdom on amd always commemorated on 6th June? How come it was 30th May?  Just like 6th June 84, where the likes of Terrorists like Indira Gandhi chose to attack Darbar Sahib where many many innocent Sikhs would suffer, as they went to commemorate Martyrdom of Maharaj. 
    • best thing is to follow the Sikh Rehat Maryada and use common sense for gray areas. Anything outside of that's irrelevant tbh that code is what Guru Gobind Singh Ji and the 5 Pyaare agreed on when creating Amrit in 1699
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use