Some home truths for Ravi Singh Khalsa Aid

[MisterrSingh]

1 hour ago, proudkaur21 said:

It's our own fault for not teaching the importance of sikhi to kids since they are young. 99% of kids born from such marriages will never be khalsa ever which is why these lines have been systematically blurred. If you cant kill them through genocide completely just assimilate them slowly.

This naivety on your part that I appreciate stems from religious preachers and figureheads is why we'll end up extinct.

What pure form of Sanatan Hindu dharam was niece-fondling, racist Bald Gandhi practicing when he managed to maneuver himself into such powerful positions? What khattar form of Islam was Jinnah following when his pork and alcohol consuming self managed to wrangle a country for his co-religionists?

Yet Sikhs are expected to have the spiritual knowledge, morals, and ethics of 10 Gurus coupled with the martial prowess of Baba Deep Singh before they're even given a sniff of leadership. That's unless you happen to be a celebrity; then you be whatever you feel like as long as you dress up and get the proles over-excited at a rally.

Today's Sikhs will never be mini-Guru Sahibs and we certainly should never aspire to be nachne-tapne people. Relinquish this delusion because with every passing year we are arriving closer to the end.

 

[dallysingh101]

5 minutes ago, Jassu said:

If you cared about sikhi you would fight for it. Not leave it for other opportunities. Shameful

Let's see how much fervour you'd retain if you're experiencing systemic oppression (essentially apartheid) by your own over generations. 

If you've been economically oppressed too, you wouldn't even have the resources required for a sustained fight back.  That's probably why tarkhans are more likely than others to tell these people where to go maybe?  

[MisterrSingh]

10 minutes ago, Jassu said:

Yes but leaving the religion doesn’t make sense. Sikhi didn’t do anything wrong. People (humans) do.

When the majority are brain-dead or slavish, who exactly is someone who doesn't fall into these categories going to stand with? Will anyone with even a little self respect tolerate having 5hit talked about them by brain-dead slaves? 

[dallysingh101]

5 minutes ago, Jassu said:

There are probably no differences in the blood of a Virk in Punjab Pakistan and a Virk in Punjab india . One is Muslim and one is a Sikh. But the Muslim one is probably posting about how great Arabs and Turks and Muslims are on Facebook and the Sikh one is probably talking about which brother to scam next for more land 

So much truth in that, that it's hilarious. 

[proudkaur21]

10 minutes ago, Jassu said:

Also leaving sikhi isn’t making a stand. Staying in Sikhi and fighting against casteism would make more sense. Leaving sikhi literally doesn’t do anything. I will say it again: these Sikhs are pathetic 

Sikhi is perfect humans are not

Our ancestors could have also chosen to give up fighting against islam rather than get their limbs cut. They chose to fight and die fighting for the truth. Why dont they stay and fight against this casteism? 

[Jassu]

2 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

So much truth in that, that it's hilarious. 

Lol when you think about it a lot of Jatts joined sikhi because of the zamindar system. I wonder if jatts would leave sikhi if given chances for more land and money. Lmao pathetic 

[Jassu]

we literally can’t even trust our blood relatives at this point much less other random Sikhs 

[proudkaur21]

16 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

What seems INSANE to me when people say such things is that essentially it sounds like: "These other people accept slavery and oppression, people within our own society should do the same too."

It completely glosses over the fact that Sikh society emerged to combat and get away from these very things. Please think about it, you're saying that oppressed Sikhs should just quietly accept their lot. How is that going to work when the whole ethos of Sikhi is to confront and combat such oppression? And what effect does it have on people when certain people try and normalise such stank hypocrisy?     I think some just (understandably) after many generations give up on any chance of equal treatment and leave. Why not focus on changing those who are so invested in perpetuating such gross inequalities amongst our own panth?  

We are not saying that its happening there so it should be allowed in sikhi. They convert to christianity where white Christians are racist against black and brown Christians. They convert to a religion that was forced on different continents. So how are they escaping inequality? Conversion to christianity provides then benefits and money. Let's say the truth.

[dallysingh101]

Just now, proudkaur21 said:

Our ancestors could have also chosen to give up fighting against islam rather than get their limbs cut. They chose to fight and die fighting for the truth. Why dont they stay and fight against this casteism? 

That's why you need to read that Sikh Revolution book I always plug. It goes into that. Those Singhs of those times didn't have these stank attitudes apnay today do. Do you think that that people who grew up a few generations away from the physical presence of our Gurus had backward attitudes like today?  If so, they would never have lasted against the moghuls and afghans.      

They never signed up to start fighting between their own for the very thing they joined Sikhi for. Humane treatment and dignity. 

[Jassu]

I honestly don’t even trust other Sikhs on this forum. Some get more triggered when you speak badly about other communities aka blacks compared to when someone is speaking badly about Sikhs