Jump to content

Bbc Sunday Morning Live / Guest Jagmeet Singh Anand Karaaj Issue


Recommended Posts

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06ksvk5

Did any sangat watch or catchup with iPlayer today, as they had a guest Jagmeet Singh speaking regarding the Anand Karaaj recent controversy.

Please forward to 30 mins in the above link to see J Singhs piece.

After the topic had been closed and the next part of the show was being introduced - Jagmeet Singh is shown voicing his opinion on the recent atrocities in Punjab.

Please keep watching the footage after the Anand Karaaj piece is shown.

18th October 2015

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

he did well to speak up and the presenter over-reacted. The other 2 Asians were more media friendly with their right-on attitudes, e.g marry whoever you want wherever you want. I'm surprised the Musli

Well done Jagmeet Singh. Personally I think every Sikh in the Uk should refuse to pay the licence fee collectively as they obviously don't feel we exist. Lets see them drag 500,000 people through the

When are apnay going to learn that white media will only support them when they puppet something they want them to? If it's Bend it like Beckham type ish, or making noise about how loyal we are and ho

Posted Images

Will repeat the post I posted on the other thread

=============

Just saw that and oh dear another face in palm moment he totally ruined the sikh image by clashing with presenter and issuing a protest at the end when they had finished the topic on the issue.

I agree he wasn't given a chance to air his views the 4 non-sikhs guests there were hostile and keen to bash the Sikh protestors but jagmeet should have remained slient and retained his composure rather than giving a negative impression of turbanned Sikhs that jagmeet has now left many viewers.

The BBC deliberately choses Sikhs like non-british born jagmeet who may have the passion for the cause but have low IQ's and understanding how the white british pro-atheist pro-feminist pro-gay and pro christian / jewish media works to air their views because they want to give the narrative that only m0ronic thugs are protesting.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The BBC deliberately choses Sikhs like non-british born jagmeet who may have the passion for the cause but have low IQ's and understanding how the white british pro-atheist pro-feminist pro-gay and pro christian / jewish media works to air their views because they want to give the narrative that only m0ronic thugs are protesting.

Kudos to anyone willing to raise their head above the parapets, but you're right, he was done up like a kipper.

Completely out of touch. We enter such situations thinking it'll be a level playing field, but I seriously doubt our elders are even aware of the things going on in the wider western world. It's through that prism of modern existence which encompasses all facets of life (not just the issue being discussed) that all our experiences and views will be filtered and dessiminated to the general public. Nothing will happen on OUR terms, yet that's exactly what our oblivious spokes-people assume will occur.

As Ranjeet Singh said earlier, play the game and cause cognitive dissonance. But you've got to know the rules of the game before the game can be played. Our lot aren't even aware that the game actually exists, lol.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Kudos to anyone willing to raise their head above the parapets, but you're right, he was done up like a kipper.

Completely out of touch. We enter such situations thinking it'll be a level playing field, but I seriously doubt our elders are even aware of the things going on in the wider western world. It's through that prism of modern existence which encompasses all facets of life (not just the issue being discussed) that all our experiences and views will be filtered and dessiminated to the general public. Nothing will happen on OUR terms, yet that's exactly what our oblivious spokes-people assume will occur.

As Ranjeet Singh said earlier, play the game and cause cognitive dissonance. But you've got to know the rules of the game before the game can be played. Our lot aren't even aware that the game actually exists, lol.

Yeah I do respect jagmeets sentiments for expressing his protest at the killing of the 2 sikh protestors by indian state not covered by the bbc news media outlets.

However there is such a thing as tact and he misread and mis-analised the overt and covert anti-sikh bias and hostiality the panelists were showing towards the Sikhs against inter-faith genocide of Sikhs marriages. It was so obvious the BBC agenda against Sikh protestors thats why the video's are now going viral all over the internet and the BBC and panelists will be exposed now for all to see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote name="genie" post="645844"

However there is such a thing as tact and he misread and mis-analised the overt and covert anti-sikh bias and hostiality the panelists were showing towards the Sikhs against inter-faith genocide of Sikhs marriages. It was so obvious the BBC agenda against Sikh protestors thats why the video's are now going viral all over the internet and the BBC and panelists will be exposed now for all to see.

Like I said before, if we are going to have the quom represented on the media you need media training.

You need to understand the media and how they operate.

There needs to better Sikh Analysts:

The BBC/Guardian/Independent/Channel4/Huffington Post all follow a particular kind of ideology, it is so obvious that you can tell how they report a news item before they are going to do it.

They claim to be liberal, but actually they are quite rigid and authoritarian.

It is the rigidity that is their weakness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why was the musilmani girl sayings its ok for her to marry a non muslim now , as its hard to find a partner. I thought she woulda backed jagmeet up. As for the presenter she was rude she should have said respected how passionate he was. Plus she didnt let him finish his point about the anand karaj. U can kiss sikhi in the Uk bye as that did not help at all.

Also what about anita kapoor, shes not even sikh. Why is she so hostile why doesnt she refer to guruji properli. Im geting so angry day by day on how we are being treated.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I said before, if we are going to have the quom represented on the media you need media training.

You need to understand the media and how they operate.

There needs to better Sikh Analysts:

The BBC/Guardian/Independent/Channel4/Huffington Post all follow a particular kind of ideology, it is so obvious that you can tell how they report a news item before they are going to do it.

They claim to be liberal, but actually they are quite rigid and authoritarian.

It is the rigidity that is their weakness.

And our shortcomings is that we do not as a kaum expose these liberal anti-sikh articles and invidivuals in the media. We do not critically analise the wordings in articles and the mannorism that presenters take, you can tell alot by body language of how much sympathy they show towards guests and how much overt or covert bias they are showing.

Take todays show this morning on the BBC you can see the overt feminist atheist overtones come across from sian williams (the presenter) when Jagmeet was trying to convey his points he was not allowed to give his point of view across he was interrupted by the kapoor woman who claimed to be a Sikh yet is sleeping around with non-sikhs cos tahts part of Sikhism now right? lol and jagmeet was outright dismissed and then he went on a tangent because he got out smarted by the well versed media savy liberal atheist anti-sikh racist elite.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

why was the musilmani girl sayings its ok for her to marry a non muslim now , as its hard to find a partner. I thought she woulda backed jagmeet up. As for the presenter she was rude she should have said respected how passionate he was. Plus she didnt let him finish his point about the anand karaj. U can kiss sikhi in the Uk bye as that did not help at all.

Also what about anita kapoor, shes not even sikh. Why is she so hostile why doesnt she refer to guruji properli. Im geting so angry day by day on how we are being treated.

Well said. That muslim journalist woman who was on the show is highly protective of Islam just read her articles online she is a fundamentalist moslem. And your right she did admit in her religion her mum told her to find a nice muslim boy and that is what she was trying to do. Why didnt the women guests pick up on her about that islamic agenda of only marring a muslim? She then goes on that now she in her 30s she would be happy just to find anyone, but here she is showing signs of al-taqiyaa (deciect) because she still will only be allowed to marry a muslim under islamic law so legally her marriage wotn be recognised if she chose a non-muslim partner who didnt convert.

Muslims are very media savy because they had years of hostility (rightly so) cos their faith is so hostile to non-muslims but they have learnt how to be sly, promote islam by propaganda and play the media game to come across different to non-muslims to what they really think when they around fellow muslims.

The Sikhs in generally are still living in village mentality thinking everyone will understand our point of view cos we tend do to so much good in society and we dont need to play the game. But that is wrong the atheists, hindu indian nationalists and the abrahmic cultists will try to bash their non-adherant opposition at any oppertunity they can get as we saw in todays show.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well said. That muslim journalist woman who was on the show is highly protective of Islam just read her articles online she is a fundamentalist moslem. And your right she did admit in her religion her mum told her to find a nice muslim boy and that is what she was trying to do. Why didnt the women guests pick up on her about that islamic agenda of only marring a muslim? She then goes on that now she in her 30s she would be happy just to find anyone, but here she is showing signs of al-taqiyaa (deciect) because she still will only be allowed to marry a muslim under islamic law so legally her marriage wotn be recognised if she chose a non-muslim partner who didnt convert.

Muslims are very media savy because they had years of hostility (rightly so) cos their faith is so hostile to non-muslims but they have learnt how to be sly, promote islam by propaganda and play the media game to come across different to non-muslims to what they really think when they around fellow muslims.

The Sikhs in generally are still living in village mentality thinking everyone will understand our point of view cos we tend do to so much good in society and we dont need to play the game. But that is wrong the atheists, hindu indian nationalists and the abrahmic cultists will try to bash their non-adherant opposition at any oppertunity they can get as we saw in todays show.

cos theyre only objective on that show was to show tht sikhs can marry who they want and our religion will die. They didnt care about religion, didnt u see what people were tweeting into the studio? all stuff about love before religion :s

Link to post
Share on other sites

All well and good slating someone sitting behind your PC, how about putting yourself forward to work with BoS so you can represent them better in the media. I'm not saying 'some' of the points you guys raise are invalid, it's just easier to critique someone after the event!

Link to post
Share on other sites

he did well to speak up and the presenter over-reacted. The other 2 Asians were more media friendly with their right-on attitudes, e.g marry whoever you want wherever you want. I'm surprised the Muslim girl said she's happy to marry anyone unless she means as long as the husband converts to Islam. The BBC don't seem to be on the cutting edge of news and tend to jump on the bandwagon. Channel 4 news are more likely to cover what is happening in Punjab. We should stop expecting the Western media to speak up for us, and have confidence in ourselves to say what needs to be said like Jagmeet did. He spoke up with the courage inspired by our Gurus.

Oh no dont rely on Channel 4 news on giving any positive coverage of Sikh protestors. When it came out last year that there was british government involvement in operation blue star the biggest genocide and terrorist attack on the heart of Sikhism in 20th century. The channel 4 news presenters gave only 2min coverage and the white woman journalist interviwed a young boy outside a southall gurdwara who said he would wanted revenge. And that wasnt edited out for a reason it was allowed to be broadcasted to paint the victimised and murdered Sikh community in as much negative protrayal as possible. These leftist white racists are just as anti-sikh as their far right wing counterparts, both hate religious people but will suck on muslims for some reason because the western governments need the hugh number of muslims for votes and to fight against them in their wars to steal their lands oil resources.

Also during the bezthi theature protests in bham back in 2004 the presenters attacked Sikh protestors even brought in atheist punjabi sunny hundal who was attacking Sikhs for standing up for their faith. They didnt give a chance for intelligent educated media savy Sikhs to give their side of the story they brought in some pendu who coulldnt string a sentenace together and was speaking in broken english. We know they do this on purpose because they wont let the opposition get a fair say or debate.

We as Sikhs need to see the wider picture see what they arent saying and what they are saying in their broadcasts.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Is that this Baba Nand Singh ji? 
    • Just thought I would translate some of the highlighted parts from these snapshots.   -Sikhi is diminishing and very few practicing sikhs will remain in the future -There will come a time when over four new ideologies will emerge on a daily basis. Sikhs will jump from one ideology to the next. Be it Bhasauria, Radha-Soami, Kuka, Communist (as examples). -People will be easily lured away from their religion -Master Tara Singh is misleading the Sikhs, just like Gandhi. Also, we don’t call him Mahatama as he has no such quality. The people that are blindly following Gandhi and hoping for indepednece will lament one day and feel the British Raj was comparatively better. -These Topi waley will not let you [sikhs] cause any commotion (meaning they will suppress you) -Naam is becoming rare. Hold on to it for your survival. It will flourish one day in the future -Don’t align with any political party -With time, a great man will come who will, with his shakti (power) make these [Indian rulers] bow down. After this a long-lasting rule will start [of the Sikhs]. Gurmukhi letters will be supreme. The counting of 13 will commence [ I believe this refers to a benevolent social structure]. The Parkarma at Harmandir Sahib will be expanded 2 or 3 times its; current width [ hinting at a surge in new Sikhs]. Even the lighting lamp posts will be adorned in gold.
    • does anyone know about the prophecy about china and russia invading india?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use