Popular Post MisterrSingh Posted May 20, 2016 Popular Post Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 Thats nonsense, panjabi muslims made up 85%+ of panjab, wen ranjit singh ruled and they welcomed him openly in the streets of lahore. Remember they were joyous at the fact they were no longer ruled by afghans (muslims), who wud kidnap panjabi muslim/hindu women, which the singhs wud bring back. Also remember, panjabi muslims have NEVER EVER EVER ruled panjab, and have only ever taken part in any attempted coup/kabza of the 5 rivers, once in 1946/47, n we butchered them good and proper. Had the british not been there drawing up lines and givin muslims panjab on a plate, we wud of captured the whole of w.panjab by the time 1948 came around. That's fine, but if we genuinely had designs on a Sikh homeland, no Sikh country would've been possible with an 85% Muslim majority! So, what do you suppose would happen? You either throw them out or convert them. Those Muslims cheering for Ranjit Singh is irrelevant. They were still Muslims! It's actually that kind of flattery and pandering to our egos that has frigged us over time and time again. So they cheered their emancipators, big deal. How did that aid us in creating a Sikh majority state? We decided to conduct a multi-religious social experiment, the end result being made homeless in 47 and then raped and butchered in the 80's and 90's. Oh but those 19th century Muslims cheered for us back in the day(!) 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post dallysingh101 Posted May 20, 2016 Popular Post Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 Don't shoot the messenger, hehe. I'm just relaying to my brothers and sisters on this site what I'm seeing and hearing, and not just me, but the kind of conversations that are starting to be had in some circles. Occasionally, we wrap ourselves up in this safe space on this site where we lose touch with the non-Sikh reality that the rest of the world is experiencing, and we end up believing things or versions of events about daily life that have very little semblance to whats truly occuring out in the world. I think that's a very dangerous way to live; possessing erroneous assumptions about a world that is clearly in a state of transition, and usually in the past we've always been a few steps behind and that's not ideal. So, yes, we should be aware of the changing tides, and if that means coming to terms with various uncomfortable truths that previously we'd be loathe to admit, then so be it. The only people who'll suffer by sticking our heads in the sand is us. Geez, I think we share the same perspective - I'm just saying let's try and meet it with our heads up. Lots of times when I go out I get weird behaviour around me. I have to say, around East London a lot of whites seems subdued and fearful. You just have to go on the tube in a bad mood (i.e. not smiling) with a backpack and people start acting all jittery. I know what some goray are like too. If the odds are in their favour, some of them would try and take the pi55 - that's something we all have to face. Not acting and looking like a pu55y has its pros and cons, in that it scares a fair few people but can also antagonise some. The other day I was on my way to Seven Sisters on the overground and the train carriage was jittery as hell. I just carried on reading my book. Then I heard some women say 'Panjabi' (in an eastern European accent), and there seemed be a big sigh of relief from a few people. hahaha! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarStriker Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 That's fine, but if we genuinely had designs on a Sikh homeland, no Sikh country would've been possible with an 85% Muslim majority! So, what do you suppose would happen? You either throw them out or convert them. Those Muslims cheering for Ranjit Singh is irrelevant. They were still Muslims! It's actually that kind of flattery and pandering to our egos that has frigged us over time and time again. So they cheered their emancipators, big deal. How did that aid us in creating a Sikh majority state? We decided to conduct a multi-religious social experiment, the end result being made homeless in 47 and then raped and butchered in the 80's and 90's. Oh but those 19th century Muslims cheered for us back in the day(!) Listen i duno y ur gettin all sarcastic. U sed in ur post "if anyone believes - in my hypothetical situation above - that no proud Hindus or Muslims would've resisted Sikh armies that were determined to carve out a country and kingdom for Sikhs". I told u panjabi muslims have never been rulers of panjab or started an uprising off their own accord, so how wud they have done so under sikh ruler over time? They cant even handle sikh soldiers in ind/pak wars. U mentioning panjabi muslims cheering us, was a comment i included coz i was talkin bowt the end of the afghans. Y ur mentioning this as if its my main point, n being all sarcastic n childish, i have no idea. Well ppl have said b4, ranjit singh shud of done mass sikhi parchar to convert non-sikhs, so we deffo missed r opportunity there. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterrSingh Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 Listen i duno y ur gettin all sarcastic. U sed in ur post "if anyone believes - in my hypothetical situation above - that no proud Hindus or Muslims would've resisted Sikh armies that were determined to carve out a country and kingdom for Sikhs". I told u panjabi muslims have never been rulers of panjab or started an uprising off their own accord, so how wud they have done so under sikh ruler over time? They cant even handle sikh soldiers in ind/pak wars. U mentioning panjabi muslims cheering us, was a comment i included coz i was talkin bowt the end of the afghans. Y ur mentioning this as if its my main point, n being all sarcastic n childish, i have no idea. Well ppl have said b4, ranjit singh shud of done mass sikhi parchar to convert non-sikhs, so we deffo missed r opportunity there. You do know what hypothetical means? A 'what if' scenario? "Had we the numbers to really get down to business, this is what we should've done" Alternate timeline? You're getting caught up in history. I'm telling you what we SHOULD'VE done, and you're haggling over numbers. I'm not being sarcastic or condescending. Who do you think I am, Jagsaw? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranjeet01 Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 From a politics point of view, for a country to admit and apologise for any past wrong doings is a sign of weakness. You concede on one point, what else would you concede on. All that will happen is that the sharks will start gathering. You can see the example of Germany. After everything that has been done during Nazi period, it has a lot of guilt which means it has lost a lot of backbone and this may have contributed in part in the problems it has today. You can see it with Japan, they committed a lot of atrocities in their occupation period. They may not have technically apologised, but they may have conceded on other points. But with North Korea and a resurgent China, they will have to regain their Samurai spirit. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghettosikh Posted May 21, 2016 Report Share Posted May 21, 2016 pretty sure stephen harper already apologized a few years back IIRC 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lsingh Posted May 21, 2016 Report Share Posted May 21, 2016 In Canada the new Sikh MPs and Ministers are raising Sikh issues. In India the Sikh MPs never raise issues as they are scared of being labelled pro Sikh by the Indians. In Britain there are no Sikh MPs as Sikhs are fairly disorgained politically. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KhoonKaBadlaKhoon Posted May 21, 2016 Report Share Posted May 21, 2016 I just dont see who they were demanding an apology from. Trudeau? Liberal Party? Trudeaus cabinet? Canada as a country? White people? This is like an innocent Muslim whos family had done nothing to Sikhs, but nonetheless got killed in 47, asking for an apology today from any random Sikh. "blah blah blah sentiments hurt, say sorry to us :(" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dallysingh101 Posted May 21, 2016 Report Share Posted May 21, 2016 I just dont see who they were demanding an apology from. Trudeau? Liberal Party? Trudeaus cabinet? Canada as a country? White people? This is like an innocent Muslim whos family had done nothing to Sikhs, but nonetheless got killed in 47, asking for an apology today from any random Sikh. "blah blah blah sentiments hurt, say sorry to us :(" Okay, but this works to highlight what a55-holes whites have been in the recent past. Even more importantly, it sends a signal to more backwards Anglophile countries that still have appalling attitudes towards nonwhite migrants like Australia. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghettosikh Posted May 22, 2016 Report Share Posted May 22, 2016 I just dont see who they were demanding an apology from. Trudeau? Liberal Party? Trudeaus cabinet? Canada as a country? White people? This is like an innocent Muslim whos family had done nothing to Sikhs, but nonetheless got killed in 47, asking for an apology today from any random Sikh. "blah blah blah sentiments hurt, say sorry to us :(" I agree with you, this is just spreading unnecessary attention to our community over an incident that hasn't affected any of us in any major way.... HOWEVER racism is still pretty rife in canadian society very recently after the Nagar Kirtan my local Gurudwara was spray painted with a nazi sign and go home.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.