Jump to content

Dasam Granth Issue Behind Attack On Dhandriawale ?


nehkeval
 Share

Recommended Posts

Update 9pm 21.05.16 | "ਮੇਰੀ ਕੋਈ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰਥ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ Statement ਦਿਖਾਓ" | DHADRIANWALE

As per this link by veer Singh559 , people who speak against dasam deserve to to be shot dead ? Guru sahib will be very happy with such talibanised 'sikhs' ?

Had these goons attacked someone like dhunda or panthpreet singh, people here will be cheering and doing jakare ?

Remember Aurangzeb ? He persecuted people for their beliefs and remember Guru Tegh bahadur - who stood up for their rights even though his own views were materially different from the hindus .

In Gurmat voilence is permitted only to prevent further voilence , e.g taking out indra or Beanta was ok .

Update 9pm 21.05.16 | "ਮੇਰੀ ਕੋਈ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰਥ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ Statement ਦਿਖਾਓ" | DHADRIANWALE

So by this token , people who speak against dasam need to to be shot dead ? Guru sahib will be very happy with such 'sikhs' ? What's the difference between us and taliban ?

Had these goons attacked someone like dhunda or panthpreet singh, people here will be cheering and doing jakare ?

Remember Aurangzeb ? He persecuted people for their beliefs and remember Guru Tegh bahadur - who stood up for their rights even though his own views were materially different from the hindus .

In Gurmat voilence is permitted only to prevent further voilence , e.g taking out indra or Beanta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup as most of you have correctly concluded its BS from dhumma's camp and the worldwide sikh sangat can see it clear now.

He is in all but explicit words justifying the attack on bhai ranjit by making up excuses now trying to drag dasam granth into it when bhai ranjit never said anything against dasam granth. But even if he did or any scholar or paracharik did there is no way any violence is allowed to justifyed in the Sikh religion against anyone who has different views let alone your fellow sikh brother.

Dhumma in a video statement said bhai ranjit made a slur against the turban of the damdami taksal and so some of his students were angered and attacked him. Bhai ranjit never slurred against the DDT he pointed out dhumma personally for his shortcomings and failings. He never accused or slurred the damdami taksal. So is now Dhumma saying he is damdami taksal and damdami taksal is him?

So we can safely conclude that Dhumma is a keshdhari hindu government agent along with few of his brain washed and brain dead low IQ students who are defaming the Sikh institution of DamDami taksal.

Sikhs now need to form a committee to excommunicate dhumma and his associates from the panth and a new head of damdami taksal needs to be elected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are those of us who believe Sikhi is the way forward for mankind. Then there are these regionalised squabbles between the very people who are supposedly at the top of the Sikh hierarchy. We wonder why people laugh in our faces when it's suggested that Sikhi is the one true path.

Come on. If any Sikh ever needed clear proof that petty, villager type mentality has wormed its way into the very core of the panth and is strangling it by representing itself as 'Sikh thought' - behold....

Has it got to the point that people are using arguments about religious texts to execute one another? This is that anakhi pendu soorma, with a bandook on his mohda mentality gone wrong. It has no place here. The guy who offed that preacher even had the balls to say that others will meet the same fate.

With all the problems we face as a community in India (let alone globally), who the hell needs this.

If anyone ever wanted evidence that 'religious Sikhs' are a backward, narrow-minded, savage bunch of junglees, who can't be trusted as leaders for their petty thinking - they just got handed an ace card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It all starts at the top and since our sri akal takht is not free and sovereign and we have a Indian govt agent as its jathedhar then he will not guide or unify the panth rather he will work towards his paymasters in punjab govt/ delhi govt.

And as no one respects the Jathedhar of Sri Akal takht . Thus at present anything coming from Akal takht he has little or no influence in Sikh circles.

And we can see without sikhi the punjab and surrounding states are in trouble with violent crime rising, debt riddled families, castism, jatha-ism, waters diverted, farmar suicides, drug mafia, land mafia, alcohol mafia, gangsterism hooliganism, capitalist consumerist society forgetting the lord, adharam atheism rising with no respect for dastaar or kesh. No love for your fellow Sikh never mind non-sikhs..... creating a dog eat dog society... a real mess without sikhi and real leadership from the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are those of us who believe Sikhi is the way forward for mankind.

I have to add:

I've given up such illusions for the moment. At the very least though, I always thought that our community (at least) has a potential ability to defend itself in some worst case scenario in the diaspora (compared to many other communities). Then you see this. It's just simply petty, gratuitous violence like I would expect over some village land dispute between 2 pendu brothers - not between two preaching groups.

What the....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use