Jump to content

Some Questions for Nirvair Khalsa Jatha


Guest Jagsaw_Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, DailyMail said:

"So how is it that you, with your little car, are not "destroying Waheguru" 

Seriously?

Yes, seriously, bro.

Would you please answer my questions above?

If someone were killing a family member of yours, would it matter to you if they were doing it fast, with a bullet, or slowly with dull knife? I think it wouldn't matter. (Please do answer this question.)

I think you're smart enough to figure out my analogy in that killing a person slowly is akin to destroying Waheguru" slowly (with a little car). If a monster car has a 4L engine, and a small car has a 1L engine, then the little car will "destroy Waheguru" in 4x the time the monster car will. 

So, why is it OK to "destroy Wahegur", just in 4X the time?

29 minutes ago, DailyMail said:

This is common sense. A car is a means to an end. It gets you from A to B. No one is questioning it's practicality. But anything that is over and above your means is excessive. It's that "excess" that is wrong. 

It may surprise you to know that I basically sympathize with you--if we're talking about expenses. Especially if we're talking about expenses paid by the Sangat.

However, that's not what Jagsaw was talking about. He said monster cars "destroy Waheguru".

Now, you say that a car is supposed to get you from A to B, and anything over that is "excess".

So, tell me, do you (or Jagsaw Singh) have an 800cc Maruti Alto? It gets you from A to B.

420px-Maruti_Suzuki_Alto.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jagsaw_Singh
Quote

So, tell me, do you (or Jagsaw Singh) have an 800cc Maruti Alto? It gets you from A to B.

Come on now BHS. You know as well as I do that a 800cc Maruti will not get you from A to B.  It will get you tipped over in a ditch each time a truck passes or a moderately strong wind blows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BhForce,

The Guru's don't want us to revert to the 16th century, with no cars and no technologies. But everything is within moderation. Excessive sleeping, excessive eating - all wrong. Both documented within gurbani. But the Guru's didn't advocate for us to stay awake and starve - get it? 

This therefore begs the question, why the monster cars?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jagsaw_Singh
Quote

@jagsaw I respect that you have an opinion

Thank you. I respect and love you too.

Quote

but you come across to me as angry

I'm not though. However you're not the first person here that's said that so although it's a wee bit frustrating for me because I'm not in the least bit angry there's not really much I can do to change that perception because it would involve supressing my thought process and creative juices. I will say though, I'm not really in the business about changing perceptions of me......I'm in the business of changing perceptions about reality. So yes...I do have an agenda.

Quote

but you come across to me....with a clear political agenda

 

Doh. My bad. I said it too soon. (see above) But yes...I gave you a clue on page 3 of my Jagmeet thread when I said the following:

"I also particularly like those posters on this forum that deploy a Socratic approach to what they write, in that they pose hard-hitting questions and opinions with the objective of provoking the reader into some reflective analysis of the issues being discussed"

I deploy a socratic method to what I say and do because I want to get the reader into some deep reflective thinking.

Quote

with a clear political agenda

Well....I wouldn't say a 'political' agenda. I mean I am a socialist and have deep political beliefs but it's very rare that partisan politics lies behind anything I say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lies aint Proof
On 1/23/2018 at 9:30 AM, Guest Jagsaw_Singh said:

The main man of Nirvair Khalsa Jatha lives in a house in Scotland valued at £1.9 million 

Do you have any proof for your claim in terms of address and ownership proof?

Or are you just throwing this lie out there to hide your pro-Muslim pro-Pakistan agenda while attacking Gursikhs

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Guest Jagsaw_Singh said:

Thank you. I respect and love you too.

I'm not though. However you're not the first person here that's said that so although it's a wee bit frustrating for me because I'm not in the least bit angry there's not really much I can do to change that perception because it would involve supressing my thought process and creative juices. I will say though, I'm not really in the business about changing perceptions of me......I'm in the business of changing perceptions about reality. So yes...I do have an agenda.

 

Doh. My bad. I said it too soon. (see above) But yes...I gave you a clue on page 3 of my Jagmeet thread when I said the following:

"I also particularly like those posters on this forum that deploy a Socratic approach to what they write, in that they pose hard-hitting questions and opinions with the objective of provoking the reader into some reflective analysis of the issues being discussed"

I deploy a socratic method to what I say and do because I want to get the reader into some deep reflective thinking.

Well....I wouldn't say a 'political' agenda. I mean I am a socialist and have deep political beliefs but it's very rare that partisan politics lies behind anything I say

Shukria ji,

I truly respect and appreciate your response. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use