Jump to content
Guest guest

media brainwashing

Recommended Posts

Guest guest
50 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Yeah, but genuinely strong, confident guys (not those putting on a act) are going to attract women like no one's business.  There are evolutionary reasons for this. Most females (not all) openly say this is something they find majorly attractive in blokes. That isn't to confuse this type of male with someone who is excessively overbearing, and a control freak - which can easily be done. I think most women want strong men that know how to challenge them over a pushover. Sure some women do prefer someone who doesn't challenge them at all, but many do.  

I think, in the current uncertain times, even more so than ever. That phase we had of homosexual driven media representations of 'metrosexuals' being some preferred model of 'masculinity' was only going to last so long. 

 

a genuinely confident person does not base their confidence on the reactions of others (including how many 'women' they attract).  

if your confidence is about how many women you can attract, its not real confidence, just a 'rouse' to attract women.  a woman (or admirer of such a person) would have to be pretty stupid to fall for that.  basically, they lack confidence yourself so are impressed by the appearance it in others.

a lot of women are stupid, insecure and sheepish.   if this is what you attract with your 'confidence' whats the value in it?

e.g. you can see all those 'pick up' artists that teach to put women down etc to get them attracted to you.

(btw not to sound sexist.  women probably see traits in a lot of men that are stupid and that other women exploit).

if you want to think independently you need to leave numbers game behind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

Some people will get triggered but the porn industry is owned and run under jewish production and direction. They are hypocrites of the highest order with a wish to destroy all other cultures and countries so their zionistic fantasy of world control and domination comes about. Does Israel recognise the multi genders, homosexuality, fornication or access to porn for their people? Not really.

Nothing to see here. Just another coincidence. You're hateful for noticing and drawing conclusions. 😅

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The mainstreaming of incest. It doesn't happen via one avenue (porn) because relying on a single source to promote these ideas isn't enough for it to filter down into the mass consciousness so that eventually something that was once considered beyond the pail creeps into normalcy by humanising the participants. So they use a mainstream source that reaches a wide enough audience that porn never will.

Someone remind me of the most popular TV show of the past 10 years that featured a central brother and sister duo who'd been in a sexual relationship since they were youngsters. Oh yes, Game of Thrones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

The mainstreaming of incest. It doesn't happen via one avenue (porn) because relying on a single source to promote these ideas isn't enough for it to filter down into the mass consciousness so that eventually something that was once considered beyond the pail creeps into normalcy by humanising the participants. So they use a mainstream source that reaches a wide enough audience that porn never will.

Someone remind me of the most popular TV show of the past 10 years that featured a central brother and sister duo who'd been in a sexual relationship since they were youngsters. Oh yes, Game of Thrones.

Publishing houses also predominately of same management have been doing a roaring trade in such storylines since before Virginia Andrews 'Flowers in the Attic' . Child abuse and incest case victims are coerced into writing books as 'catharsis' its all BS , schaudenfreude and getting sick thrills from others pain.prime example is the 'child called it' series , which some say has raked in millions for the author and publishing house

Edited by jkvlondon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

Publishing houses also predominately of same management have been doing a roaring trade in such storylines since before Virginia Andrews 'Flowers in the Attic' . Child abuse and incest case victims are coerced into writing books as 'catharsis' its all BS , schaudenfreude and getting sick thrills from others pain.prime example is the 'child called it' series , which some say has raked in millions for the author and publishing house

Just watch any music video,  they are littered symbolism,  lady in red, virgin sacrifices,  blood sacrifices,  illuminati etc etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guot singh
On 7/9/2019 at 10:20 AM, MisterrSingh said:

The mainstreaming of incest. It doesn't happen via one avenue (porn) because relying on a single source to promote these ideas isn't enough for it to filter down into the mass consciousness so that eventually something that was once considered beyond the pail creeps into normalcy by humanising the participants. So they use a mainstream source that reaches a wide enough audience that porn never will.

Someone remind me of the most popular TV show of the past 10 years that featured a central brother and sister duo who'd been in a sexual relationship since they were youngsters. Oh yes, Game of Thrones.

ok

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/8/2019 at 11:58 PM, Guest guest said:

this argument implies that you admire blacks and their genes?

I was trying to understand this from whites perspective. But, if you're asking, if I think about it, I do admire how black people survived what was essentially a good few centuries of genocide and slavery. Let's compare African-Americans (for instance), with the current state of the original inhabitants of what is now the US. The former are infinitely more assertive despite centuries of hell and suppression - even given all the subtle and no so subtle racism in the US. 

 

Quote

the native white populations of England are already pretty diverse (celts, romans, vikings etc).  they don't marry their siblings or cousins (so no inbreeding).  

That is quite possibly a relatively recent thing in my opinion. We know the upper classes were into inbreeding. I've been reading Dickens a bit lately too, and there a  few examples of cousins marrying therein too - and it is mentioned without any guilt like it was normal. Don't think that what you see today is indicative of past norms. 

 

Quote

a certain percentage of whites also have genetic immunity to the HIV virus (not known amongst non-whites).  non-whites have higher rates of heart disease, diabetes, and vit d deifiencey.  so your 'scientific' argument about blacks having robust genes is nonesense.  also if this was about genetic diveristy, you would think the scientific establishment would be promoting it, not the media.

It has other support too. Look at how pedigree dogs are infinitely more prone to health issues compared to mongrels for example. The white scientific community, isn't some noble group of people trying to promote fairness and equality btw, they have their own bigots - probably even more so than in the wider population. Look at how top universities in England get exposed for serious discrepancies in their retention and support for black males for example. Having known a few guys of such backgrounds who've been to these institutes, I can say that these experiences are not exaggerated - probably actually suppressed and under represented in the media.

And go out in England, see how English girls drool over light-skinned 'mixed race' guys.

Are you a white pretending not to be btw? 

Quote

also why don't they show as many white male- black female couples?  and if whites want to admire blacks, that is their choice, but why force it on other groups?

I agree. Maybe it's the individual masculinity they admire then? It's obvious that they are curiously fascinated by black males (physically) and feel threatened by them at the same time too. Maybe this is a way for them to reduce a potential threat - by breeding them out? Actually their fascination and promotion of these things are very unlikely to be down to a single simple factor - it's probably multifaceted - an element of which is subconscious. Maybe it's related to the mass covert homosexuality amongst the anglos too  - so they have a secret fascination with perceived bbcs? Who knows exactly what goes on in these people's heads? 

Why don't you try not watching white media so much if it bothers you that much? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/9/2019 at 12:05 AM, Guest guest said:

 

a genuinely confident person does not base their confidence on the reactions of others (including how many 'women' they attract).  

if your confidence is about how many women you can attract, its not real confidence, just a 'rouse' to attract women.  a woman (or admirer of such a person) would have to be pretty stupid to fall for that.  basically, they lack confidence yourself so are impressed by the appearance it in others.

a lot of women are stupid, insecure and sheepish.   if this is what you attract with your 'confidence' whats the value in it?

e.g. you can see all those 'pick up' artists that teach to put women down etc to get them attracted to you.

(btw not to sound sexist.  women probably see traits in a lot of men that are stupid and that other women exploit).

if you want to think independently you need to leave numbers game behind.

I think you're just running around in circles and stating the obvious whilst repeatedly missing my point. I don't get what you are arguing about?

I'm not talking about anyone faking confidence like you keep rabbiting on about. I'm talking about genuinely physically confident guys. The women running around them is just a by product of them being that way. Yes, it's true that some guys faking it attract certain types of females too - but I wasn't talking about them. 

And if you think all or most women can be simply conceptualised like you've done above.......

Try reading CP and see what you learn from that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct me if I'm wrong, but  didn't punjabi people come from Persia?

Anyways if you want these "black-genes" Just do some slavery work for a couple generations.

African-americans are built different from Africans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/13/2019 at 1:00 AM, KhalistanYouth said:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but  didn't punjabi people come from Persia?

Okay, You're wrong. Panjabis are more than just immigrant Persians.

 

Quote

Anyways if you want these "black-genes" Just do some slavery work for a couple generations.

That's a stupid statement. First thing, LOTS of the Africans/African-Americans that did this didn't survive, they died. The ones we see are the descendents of the ones that didn't.

Quote

African-americans are built different from Africans.

Not all, some Africans are very similar in physique to AA, like Nigerians. But the differences we do see can be down to mixed blood and natural selection from the horrendous experience of slavery. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/15/2019 at 4:50 PM, dallysingh101 said:

Okay, You're wrong. Panjabis are more than just immigrant Persians.

 

That's a stupid statement. First thing, LOTS of the Africans/African-Americans that did this didn't survive, they died. The ones we see are the descendents of the ones that didn't.

Not all, some Africans are very similar in physique to AA, like Nigerians. But the differences we do see can be down to mixed blood and natural selection from the horrendous experience of slavery. 

Lol  

The descendants obviously had better stock from their slave ancestors 

and Punjabi people are more than pesians yes

Punjab itself was influenced from many, e.g turks,persians,greeks, etc and our own culture of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, KhalistanYouth said:

Lol  

The descendants obviously had better stock from their slave ancestors 

and Punjabi people are more than pesians yes

Punjab itself was influenced from many, e.g turks,persians,greeks, etc and our own culture of course.

So basically, you don't really know what you are talking about and have a habit of making sweeping statements that have more holes in them than swiss cheese......

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/18/2019 at 6:40 PM, dallysingh101 said:

So basically, you don't really know what you are talking about and have a habit of making sweeping statements that have more holes in them than swiss cheese......

 

 

I'm sure that slavery did impact genes or so.

Edited by KhalistanYouth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/18/2019 at 6:40 PM, dallysingh101 said:

So basically, you don't really know what you are talking about and have a habit of making sweeping statements that have more holes in them than swiss cheese......

 

 

And Punjabi's are more than "immigrant persians"

we're our own people that has historically been influenced by other cultures due to our rulers, don't deny history.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, KhalistanYouth said:

You do realize slavery did IMPACT their genes and everything?

Yes. But don't forget social factors that influenced how their society developed too. These things aren't small. Losing a parent in childhood (in whatever way) is proven to have major implications for the majority of people who experience it. Given what they were facing with the constant violence,  moving around and being totally unsettled due to slavery is a BIG factor too. 

Anyway, you care to try and explain why apnay in certain areas of Canada are doing the exact same thing people are castigating kalay for? I mean the drug dealing and apnay on apnay violence. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Guest Jigsaw_Puzzled_Singh
      Everything, and I mean absolutely EVERY LITTLE THING, the white man has was stolen from brown and black people. EVERYTHING...including medicine. Appropriate it...steal it...call it what you want but the fact is that white people have throughout history right up to the present day, steal what brown and black people have and then call it their own. In a few posts on this thread I have mentioned how white people stole eastern philosophy and then claimed it as their own (and called it western philosophy) even through the original practitioners of that philosophy made it abundantly clear that the white northern european was a barbarian incapable of intellectual thought but really it runs far more deeper than that. White people have always been about TAKING, TAKING and TAKING. They habitually take and then claim as their own. They are habitual thieves. Here's some more examples: The cure to smallpox was actually invented by a black slave, Onesimus. Here's the story of how the white man stole it from him and claimed it as their own: https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/blog/onesimus-smallpox-boston-cotton-mather   Picasso stole his 'art' from ancient African art and claimed it as his (western intellectalisms) own:   Now you know me....You know I could go on and on here. The point is that white people...ALL WHITE PEOPLE....are not only thieves but they are also habitual liars. They LIE. And they teach their children to LIE. They lie because they cannot handle the truth. Not only do they lie about true history but they also lie day to day when it comes to getting jobs, their qualifications etc. You see the priviledge they have created for themselves enables them to lie. They're not held accountable the way we are.  What we're seeing now from white people though is a desperate attempt to preserve their priviledge. Their lies are being exposed and history is fast catching up with them. For example, not only are the Chinese and Indians now at the forefront of medical advances the Chinese are giving white people payback in the sense that a hundred odd years ago the white man deliberately pushed opium on the Chinese masses and now the Chinese are paying back that favour by flooding the white man with opiods. At the end of the day thieves always get their comeuppance.
    • India in it's current political format is. But it definitely exists as a geographical entity or even as some civilisational entity and is far more connected than what Pakistan is. The strands that keep it together are more indigenous.  Islam and not being India is what makes Pakistan.  
    • I’m here bro u getting  from me?? y the other clown call me yogi worship do Sikhs worship yogi? if I have question about Gurbani instead of if giving me the right anwser You guys twisting with yogi radaswami 
    • The comparison is wrong as others have said.  Also Gurbani says there is only one Guru who is Akal Purakh himself.  Maybe read Gurbani and your mind will not travel into atheist thinking.    
    • Thank you for leaving this forum
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use