Jump to content

Why was Jathedar Baba Sahib Singh ji Kicked Out?


Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, dharamyudh said:

Go look at yourself before you start questioning Singhs like Baba Santa Singh Ji 96 Crori or any other Mahapurakh of the Panth. Literally sit on a forum and do Nindya of GurSikhs.

This is the type of reaction you get from brain dead people who will believe that someone is a Mahapurkh without even bothering to see what that person has done which has elevated him to such a position. The person this guy thinks is a Mahapurkh is someone who allowed himself to be used by Indira Gandhi and who was doing 'kar sewa' against the wishes of the entire Sikh people while the army which had murdered hundreds of pilgrims were walking around wearing shoes and smoking and drinking and providing him protection. LET THAT SINK IN.

Knowing how the Nihangs of old used to treat anyone even threatening to smoke in their presence, the fact that this 'mahapurkh' was ok with Indian army walking around smoking just shows how much of a Gaddar he was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, proactive said:

This is the type of reaction you get from brain dead people who will believe that someone is a Mahapurkh without even bothering to see what that person has done which has elevated him to such a position. The person this guy thinks is a Mahapurkh is someone who allowed himself to be used by Indira Gandhi and who was doing 'kar sewa' against the wishes of the entire Sikh people while the army which had murdered hundreds of pilgrims were walking around wearing shoes and smoking and drinking and providing him protection. LET THAT SINK IN.

Knowing how the Nihangs of old used to treat anyone even threatening to smoke in their presence, the fact that this 'mahapurkh' was ok with Indian army walking around smoking just shows how much of a Gaddar he was. 

Proof that they were "wearing shoes and smoking and drinking and providing him protection?" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dharamyudh said:

Somebody destroys your home are you going to pay for it? Hell no, you better pay for the damage you caused. Why should the sangat pay for the damage? He did Kar Sewa to restore the Takht, something you lot actually completely destroyed, you know, even the foundations that Sri Guru HarGobind Sahib Ji built themselves. 

That is the lamest excuse ever. So he was MAKING INDIRA PAY FOR THE DAMAGE. Are you for real? The only ones who made Indira pay for what she did were Shaheed Beant Singh and Shaheed Satwant Singh. They did in the true spirit of the Khalsa but I assume you would want to see the certificates of their Bhagti beyond you have an opinion on what they did. What a joke. As for the rebuilding of the Akal Takht this was necessitated because of the anger felt by the Sikh nation that a GADDAR'S hand had been used to repair it with money from the Tyrant who had bombarded it with tanks. I don't agree with it, they should have looked for a way to re-sanctify the Akal Takht by a symbolic cleansing of it. But just because they did wrong does not exonerate the GADDAR from his GADDARI. The same GADDAR who subsequently had to beg for admittance into the Khalsa form the same 'British inspired' SGPC that he had been badmouthing for years and refusing to accept it, after he lived the life of a TANKHAIYA FOR DECADES. 

I can only assume you were either a kid in nappies or not even born in 1984 so you cannot understand what the anger was of all Sikhs at that time, that a Nihang Jathedar claiming to a representative of the Khalsa Panth would willingly collude with the greatest tyrant the Sikh nation had faced in the 20th century. It's so easy to re-write history and give lame excuses that only starry eyed kids would believe to justify what was the greatest GADDARI that someone who claimed to a Jathedar has ever done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, proactive said:

That is the lamest excuse ever. So he was MAKING INDIRA PAY FOR THE DAMAGE. Are you for real? The only ones who made Indira pay for what she did were Shaheed Beant Singh and Shaheed Satwant Singh. They did in the true spirit of the Khalsa but I assume you would want to see the certificates of their Bhagti beyond you have an opinion on what they did. What a joke. As for the rebuilding of the Akal Takht this was necessitated because of the anger felt by the Sikh nation that a GADDAR'S hand had been used to repair it with money from the Tyrant who had bombarded it with tanks. I don't agree with it, they should have looked for a way to re-sanctify the Akal Takht by a symbolic cleansing of it. But just because they did wrong does not exonerate the GADDAR from his GADDARI. The same GADDAR who subsequently had to beg for admittance into the Khalsa form the same 'British inspired' SGPC that he had been badmouthing for years and refusing to accept it, after he lived the life of a TANKHAIYA FOR DECADES. 

I can only assume you were either a kid in nappies or not even born in 1984 so you cannot understand what the anger was of all Sikhs at that time, that a Nihang Jathedar claiming to a representative of the Khalsa Panth would willingly collude with the greatest tyrant the Sikh nation had faced in the 20th century. It's so easy to re-write history and give lame excuses that only starry eyed kids would believe to justify what was the greatest GADDARI that someone who claimed to a Jathedar has ever done. 

Blah blah blahhhh ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, proactive said:

That is the lamest excuse ever. So he was MAKING INDIRA PAY FOR THE DAMAGE. Are you for real? The only ones who made Indira pay for what she did were Shaheed Beant Singh and Shaheed Satwant Singh. They did in the true spirit of the Khalsa but I assume you would want to see the certificates of their Bhagti beyond you have an opinion on what they did. What a joke. As for the rebuilding of the Akal Takht this was necessitated because of the anger felt by the Sikh nation that a GADDAR'S hand had been used to repair it with money from the Tyrant who had bombarded it with tanks. I don't agree with it, they should have looked for a way to re-sanctify the Akal Takht by a symbolic cleansing of it. But just because they did wrong does not exonerate the GADDAR from his GADDARI. The same GADDAR who subsequently had to beg for admittance into the Khalsa form the same 'British inspired' SGPC that he had been badmouthing for years and refusing to accept it, after he lived the life of a TANKHAIYA FOR DECADES. 

I can only assume you were either a kid in nappies or not even born in 1984 so you cannot understand what the anger was of all Sikhs at that time, that a Nihang Jathedar claiming to a representative of the Khalsa Panth would willingly collude with the greatest tyrant the Sikh nation had faced in the 20th century. It's so easy to re-write history and give lame excuses that only starry eyed kids would believe to justify what was the greatest GADDARI that someone who claimed to a Jathedar has ever done. 

Bro do you read? When did I imply that he made Indira pay for the damage. You do the damage, you should be the one who pays for it. This is what they did. Simple as. Why do you want the sangat to pay for something that you damaged? How is the a lame excuse? You know why you're calling it a lame excuse? Because it makes sense. Simple as lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What do you mean?
    • Don't be a fool to the western civilization. 
    • This is where the vichola needs to get involved, and family!
    • Hi All, I havent been on this forum for a while but I thought id give it a try again as it helped me through some rough times earlier in my life. I wanted to seek for guidance on sikhi and marriage ... I noticed a post earlier on sanjog etc. and it got me thinking about my own life and marriage. For context, I have been married 3 years and things are not working out. When we met, I looked in to sanjog alot and it felt like it was written. However, as these years have gone by its become apparent that we no longer align with each other and our marriage is struggling. We dont seem to understand each other and things have fallen apart. We are at a stage now where separation/divorce is looking like the best option. Neither of us are happy and whilst we have tried to work things through in many different ways, after 3 years we have drifted away. What are the sikh views on this? is it written if we decide that we no longer serve each other? or is that a sin and should I continue to work at it? my issue at the moment is that it is draining me. I feel withdrawn from everything due to things going on between us including sikhi and going to the gurdwara.  Breaks my heart to even be writing this but I do think if we are both not happy and cant see a way of being happy then what is the point in continuing? Or should I be continuing and is it paap if we dont honour our laavan? if that is the case, what does sikhi say about marriage? how do I continue knowing everyday I feel the way I do?   Thanks
    • sorry ,   www.santbhagwansingh.co.uk
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use