Jump to content

Akj Stance On Sri Dasm Granth Sahib Jee


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I THOUGHT THE DUMDUMMY BOYS WERE GOING TO CHOP MY HEAD OFF FOR MY QUESTIONS LIKE THEY ATTACKED THE SIKH CHANNEL VAN!!!!!!!!!!!

RESPECT TO THE TRUE TAKSAAL.

ANYWAY I HAVE MANY QUESTIONS THAT NEED ANSWERING COULD SOMEONE TELL ME WHO THE TAKSAAL JATHEDHAR IS SO I CAN GET A REASONABLE ANSWER.

Aww bechara, all that jumping around and shouting and it all turned out to be pointless!! lol

And now instead of admitting that he was wrong and accepting it, he/she tries to cause more trouble!

If you thought you were going to get your head chopped off and you were scared to question people there, do you feel safer doing it over the internet? Your not painting a very respectable picture of yourself are you :)

This thread would appear to be about informing the sangat about the official stance of the AKJ on the gurbani of Dasam Granth Sahib Ji, not about who is the jathedhar of taksal, you clever clever clever person! None of us saw that one coming!! How clever to bring up that age old jathedharis question when you have nothing new to say about the original thread!

As Singhs have said, ask your questions, but ask them with sincerity and ask them genuinely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"khalistan_zindabad" veerji, just because a certain miscreant claims to be from AKJ and goes public and propagates his own twisted logic doesn't mean he or his logic is endorsed by AKJ. It would be unfair to call such people as representatives of AKJ. I am sure you know better.

"BhForce" veerji, we need to watch out for all fake Sikhs, no matter what jathebandi they claim to belong to in order to further their own vested interests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Veer Khalistan_Zindabad,

Again and again I see you, causing some kind of mischief in regards to the Akhand Keertani Jatha. I would like to openly ask you, what is your issue with Akhand Keertani Jatha? I ask this question because I have seen you’re in-direct insults, comments, pseudo truths about Bhai Sahib Bhai Randheer Singh and venom slinging if there is Akhand Keertani Jatha views on forum way way way before the whole issue with Dasam Granth. I have seen this for years!! I therefore I openly ask you, with folded hands why don’t you tell me and the sangath of your true issue with AKhand Keertani Jatha.

Note: Please do not say you have no issue because I personally have witness this for years and so have many other brothers. I can say with honesty that it is becoming annoying and quite obvious of this.

The singhs of the Jatha sing/recite and praise the same Guru as you! Previously you have wound up hot blooded youth who end up putting silly comments on forums which cause divide. You seem to me much mature in your writing however your mind set seems to be of a sixteen year old. (with all due respect). If you care about ekta why do you always attempt to attack Akhand Keertani Jatha. Why attempt to make an issue of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’. I sensed your frustration in another topic in regards to the barsi writing along the line of when the Sikh Channel stated having technical difficulties, they had put ‘AKJ Keertan’ why would you need to put in specifically ‘AKJ’? and what different does it make what Jatha was doing Keertan? This to me seems another attempt of causing some sort of propaganda and show’s your feelings in regards to Akhand Keertani Jatha.

Note: I am not stating that your first post in this topic is an attack on the Jatha with the press releases, but I can sense where you are heading and from previous posts.

Just because you met some negative feeling from one person why defame the whole Jatha and it is a fact that this issue seems like just another reason for you to attack the jatha because the question arises what about before?; all those years of your failed attempts to attack the jatha. I am not entirely sure but a couple years back in Birmingham when a couple of potential youth who claimed to be Taksaali’s had gone pesh at a amrith sanchaar organised by Akhand Keertani Jatha, I did hear a few Taksaal’s singhs became negative towards Akhand Keertani Jatha and began to bad mouth the Jatha and make up lies about Bhai Sahib Bhai Randheer Singh. If that is a reason for some Taksaali Veer to act with hatred, I am very disappointed. It should not matter where a gurmukh piaara goes pesh, amrith is amrith do not see it as different, tyaar-bar-tyaar punj piaare are all the same – Guru Gobind Singh Jees roop. Let the abhilaaki go pesh wherever they want as long as the punj are tyaar-bar-tyaar.

I am not sure who you speak to from AKhand Keertani Jatha, I personally have not met ONE SINGLE gurmukh piaara from the Jatha who doubts Dasam Guru’s Baani; yes some singhs from the Jatha have mentioned at times not putting Siri Dasam Granth parallel to Guru Granth Sahib Jee, but never have doubt Dasam Guru’s baani. I would like to request you to stop your attempts of belittling, defaming and the use of propaganda of pseudo information relating to Akhand Keertani Jatha. If you would like to ask a question then I am sure you can approach any of the senior Gurmukhs. As I had mentioned I personally have never met or heard anyone doubt Dasam Patshahs baani, so please stop your propaganda which you attempt to spread over the years. I certainly am looking forward to your answer to my question stated at the beginning of my post.

I apologise if I have offended. It was not my intention to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't really speak to anything k-z has posted in other threads, but in this thread, he hasn't said anything against AKJ.

I agree with t_singh's post that Sikhi isnot a numbers game and we don't have to have a competition for most members in such and such a jatha or group.

Khalistan_ z is one of the most behaved singhs i have seen on this forum. His stance on Dasam granth should not be taken as an affront towards AKJ. AKJ itself a staunch supporter of Dasam Granth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

kulwant singh openy on tv said i am akj member

LOL! Anti-Dasam Bani Kulwant Singh Dhesi passing himself off as a AKJ rep!

Next up:

  • Babbu Mann claiming to be Nihang member
  • Miss Pooja saying she's a Taksal member
  • Ashutosh saying he's a member of S. Dhadrianwale jatha

Just because you take amrit in a Taksal ceremony does not make you a "Taksali Singh".

Like I said above, people need to be aware of these pseudo-akjs, pseudo-sants, and others.

not to be funny or anything, bro how does one become a Taksal member ? I want to take amrit from Damdama Sahib and want to join Taksal, How do I become part of the Jatha ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gurmukho,

I'm pretty new to the community here, but my god am I shocked at some people's arrogance... what with all the threatening going on?

Why are sikhs threatening other sikhs? - "oh If your weren't so scared, why didn't you come and raise your viewpoint?" I honestly believe some people have forgotten sikhi's true kind nature. Yes - pick the the sword when you need to, not at your own people...!

To be perfectly honest, it's an abysmal state of affairs. Har kisey da apna hi panth nirala hai ajj kalh. But SHAME on the people that start oppressing others and enforcing their own religious views by threatening others. Might isn't right, Tyrants are always mighty. We bear arms to protect peoples beliefs, when did this change to enforcing beliefs? It's laughable how some people think they are in chardi kala with all this haumai and ahankaar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use