Jump to content

Basics Of Sikhi Vs Muslim Mugs


StarStriker
 Share

Recommended Posts

North American Sikhs think those of us in the UK exaggerate or even fabricate the Islamic menace. The reason they haven't been exposed to that type of behaviour from the Muslims over there is because it's still, comparatively, early days. The Muslims are still acclimatising to the US, getting their feet under the table, testing the waters. Give it another 20 or so years and N.A. Sikhs will be faced with the same issues we've been faced with since the 80's. Admittedly, not all of them are like that, but when they start to increase in number, their true nature shines through.

Canada is very left wing socialist country and they are even more politically correct than the UK which is quite worrying.

Toronto is the feminist capital of the world and the feminists in general seem to be very quiet on these Islamic misogynists.

The North American continent has CAIR (Council of American Islamic Relations) which part of the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt. They cannot confront in the open so they use covert methods of infiltrating institutions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "affiliated" don't like Jugraj Singh, or at least support him openly, because he doesn't belong to any particular Jatha. They'd be crowing about him from the rooftops if he belonged to one of their groups. He doesn't need them. That way lies divisions, and that's not what's needed in these times.

Where did you get this from? I've known people affiliated to a jatha supporting Jagraj Singh. What causes division is when people become so engrossed in their beliefs that they begin to lack understanding of different people outside of it. Your thinking is identical to a non-religious person saying religion causes division. No, it’s not; it is people's attitude and lack of respect that does. Personally, I do not even associate myself with any sikh even though I believe in certain practices from a jatha. I respect Jagraj Singh regardless, but even if Jagraj Singh was affiliated to a jatha, I still would not be crowing about him from the roof-tops. In your mentality, how do you explain a sikh like myself that has a strong admiration for other cultures/people outside of sikhi? It makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you serious? Next you will be saying Bapu Surat Singh Ji and Bhai Mohan Singh Ji are looking for confrontation? These Sikhs are undertaking the tenents commanded by WaheGuru which the vast majority of Sikhs (I'm including myself) are failing in.

I have no doubt even Jagraj Singh, Bapu Surat Singh, Mohan Singh are not perfect but like pure gold or silver you cannot wear use\wear the gold until you add an impurity such are the wonders of WaheGuru.

I rarely donate to a Gurdwara now, I donate to Basics of Sikhi, SAS, Kalgidhar Society etc. and try to attend their seminars where possible to be in mind, body & spirit.

The Spirit of the Khalsa lives on with the likes of Jagraj Singh, Bapu Surat Singh, Mohan Singh and so many countless men,women & children doing the Sewa of WaheGuru mostly anonymously!!!

Great post, totally agree with u. I rarely give to charities, not coz im kanjoos/stingy, but bcoz u cant trust em, n there r many charlatans out there. I do however give donations to 'basics of sikhi', sikh awareness society (s.a.s/bhai mohan singh).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Great post, totally agree with u. I rarely give to charities, not coz im kanjoos/stingy, but bcoz u cant trust em, n there r many charlatans out there. I do however give donations to 'basics of sikhi', sikh awareness society (s.a.s/bhai mohan singh).

Sikh Awareness Society has existed for a long time, yet their issue just gets worse for some reason?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did you get this from? I've known people affiliated to a jatha supporting Jagraj Singh. What causes division is when people become so engrossed in their beliefs that they begin to lack understanding of different people outside of it. Your thinking is identical to a non-religious person saying religion causes division. No, it’s not; it is people's attitude and lack of respect that does. Personally, I do not even associate myself with any sikh even though I believe in certain practices from a jatha. I respect Jagraj Singh regardless, but even if Jagraj Singh was affiliated to a jatha, I still would not be crowing about him from the roof-tops. In your mentality, how do you explain a sikh like myself that has a strong admiration for other cultures/people outside of sikhi? It makes no sense.

The ones who live and breathe for their Jatha at the exclusion of all balance and fairness. You don't strike me as someone who is blind to someone's value outside of the affiliations they hold, be they sect, religion, race, etc. Not everyone approaches life in that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use