Jump to content

Lord Indarjit Singh


Premi5
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 11/2/2019 at 8:52 AM, Premi5 said:

Indarjit Singh has accused the BBC of “prejudice and intolerance”.  

This Lord is not one to talk about prejudice and intolerance. He smacks of pride and arrogance.

He once posted some nonsense article about Dasme Patshah's Granth on the net. I contacted him by phone and asked if I could discuss some of the points via email. He said yes, but then after the first point I made about Kavi Sainapats "Sri Gur Sobha" NOT being a source of prrof of gurgaddi of SGGS, AND sending him the text, he wouldn't reply and told me not to contact him again.

Even in his magazine the arrogant lord has used Sri Gur Sobha as a source of proof.

Whatever the bbc is, it is no loss for them, or for the Sikh Panth for this arrogant uneducated lord not being there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/4/2019 at 4:51 PM, puzzled said:

Master tara singh was our leader during those times and representing us    is it true that he sold us out?

 

No it's not true. Master Tara Singh did his best to guide the Sikh community. The problem was that it was the frying pan or the fire.

 

23 hours ago, TigerForce1 said:

He was a stooge!  Hindu convert to Sikhi who was planted to make sure the demand for a Sikh country was quickly abandoned once the British dismissed it as not practical.

 

Stooge? of who? The british, congress party and Muslims hated him.

 

If he was a plant, why would Master Tara Singh be the first indian to be arrested and jailed for treason shortly after partition, for asking Nehru to fulfil his "autonomous state" promise?

 

23 hours ago, puzzled said:

yh just checked  he was born into a khatri family and was named Nanak Chand,   maybe he was a mona sikh before he became amritdhari ... 

Well so were the Gurus.

If you read the life of Master Tara Singh, not only he but another 3 of his brothers ended up taking Pahul. His father was dead against Master Ji's actions. Master Tara Singh was 14 when he took pahul. Before that he and his family were nanak-panthis.

 

 

23 hours ago, puzzled said:

we have always been at our weakest when we had no leader, like today basically,  and if we had corrupt leaders like him  no wonder we ended up in a mess 

Master Tara Singh wasn't corrupt. His problem was that he was too honest. His weakness was that he had no Plan B, which is always necessary in politics.

 

Master Tara Singh tried so hard to get the Panthic Sikhs and Congress Sikh together on one party and one platform to contest elections, but to no avail.

I would do some more reading if I were to you to learn more about Master Tara Singh, who has been very unfairly maligned for partition.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, chatanga1 said:

 

No it's not true. Master Tara Singh did his best to guide the Sikh community. The problem was that it was the frying pan or the fire.

 

 

Stooge? of who? The british, congress party and Muslims hated him.

 

If he was a plant, why would Master Tara Singh be the first indian to be arrested and jailed for treason shortly after partition, for asking Nehru to fulfil his "autonomous state" promise?

 

Well so were the Gurus.

If you read the life of Master Tara Singh, not only he but another 3 of his brothers ended up taking Pahul. His father was dead against Master Ji's actions. Master Tara Singh was 14 when he took pahul. Before that he and his family were nanak-panthis.

 

 

Master Tara Singh wasn't corrupt. His problem was that he was too honest. His weakness was that he had no Plan B, which is always necessary in politics.

 

Master Tara Singh tried so hard to get the Panthic Sikhs and Congress Sikh together on one party and one platform to contest elections, but to no avail.

I would do some more reading if I were to you to learn more about Master Tara Singh, who has been very unfairly maligned for partition.

 

wasn't there another Singh on the negotiation team who was approached by the British rep from army in London to please try and take a sikh homeland but he ran it past Nehru who sidelined him ? so it wasn't just  Tara Singh who was unable to be forceful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, chatanga1 said:

I would do some more reading if I were to you to learn more about Master Tara Singh, who has been very unfairly maligned for partition.

I stand by my view regarding Master Tara Singh! Read ‘Betrayal of the Sikh Nation’ by author Ram Singh.  

This view is not just something that came about post Partition.  I remember reading somewhere, the same view was held with many prominent Sikhs of the time where they questioned Master Tara Singhs authenticity of even being a Sikh by challenging him to eat ‘Beef’ to prove he was not a Hindu.  He declined to eat it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, TigerForce1 said:

I stand by my view regarding Master Tara Singh! Read ‘Betrayal of the Sikh Nation’ by author Ram Singh.  

I have read it. Its trash. Written by foolish khalistanis who need to pass the blame onto soft targets. I would advise avoiding groups like Dal Khalsa for information /evidence. 

 

Ram singh wouldn't have even achieved 5% of what Master Tara Singh achieved. 

 

Post some of this trash that you feel is right about Master Tara Singh and we can discuss it. 

 

28 minutes ago, TigerForce1 said:

 I remember reading somewhere, the same view was held with many prominent Sikhs of the time where they questioned Master Tara Singhs authenticity of even being a Sikh by challenging him to eat ‘Beef’ to prove he was not a Hindu.  He declined to eat it.  

That is very good of Master Tara Singh to have refused the beef if that story is correct. Personally i think its a false story.

No sikh would ever encourage the eating of beef to anyone let alone another Sikh. 

The fact that Master Tara Singhs own father tried so hard to get him to leave the Khalsa Panth but even at the young age of 14 Tara Singh refused his father should tell you something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

 so it wasn't just  Tara Singh who was unable to be forceful

Do you ever engage that brain of yours before posting? 

 

Master Tara Singh? Unforceful? That can only come from someone who knows nothing about his life. 

 

You post a lot here. That worries me. I have read some of your other posts here which are just outright lies on Master Tara Singh. Curb your lies. Try researching something before you start shooting your loose mouth off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, chatanga1 said:

Do you ever engage that brain of yours before posting? 

 

Master Tara Singh? Unforceful? That can only come from someone who knows nothing about his life. 

 

You post a lot here. That worries me. I have read some of your other posts here which are just outright lies on Master Tara Singh. Curb your lies. Try researching something before you start shooting your loose mouth off. 

what did I say About Tara Singh apart from him not being forceful during negotiations  along with others speaking for sikh kaum? Why did he not get the promises enshrined in legal documents  if he followed his Guru ji's advice he would have known to not trust the saugand or Oaths of any party but to take affirmative action in terms of setting up Punjab as an indivisible state under the Indian constitution instead of taking Gandhi's word at being a willing victim if he reneged.

I remembered the name of the Singh I was talking about Sardar Baldev Singh , his contributions to sikh negotiations are listed in the wiki entry, he seems to have tried to negotiate the kind of deal I mentioned  :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baldev_Singh

Yes Master Tara Singh did confront Nehru post independance , it was after the horse had bolted ... he must have known the reputations of the men he was dealing with both dodgy in the extreme  and yet why trust such people?who could bed other's wives or other men  whilst mistreating their own wives

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

what did I say About Tara Singh apart from him not being forceful during negotiations  along with others speaking for sikh kaum? 

This alone shows you have done zero research into this time period yourself but are just either making up this rubbish yourself or repeating someone else's rubbish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
    • Good way of putting it, bro. One of the ongoing themes of Gurbani is the fake saint. Whether it's fake babas in Punjab or English-speaking personalities in the West, it's an continuing problem of religion through the centuries (and it's not exclusive to us by any means, this applies to all human societies).
    • First of all, while it's true that Gurbani says slandering a Saint has such-and-such effects, you can't do the reverse: You can't look and your situation and know for certain what caused it. We're not encouraged to mope over our situations but rather to accept the hukam (will). The last line of the very first pauri of Japji Sahib says to live in hukam: ਹੁਕਮਿ ਰਜਾਈ ਚਲਣਾ ਨਾਨਕ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਨਾਲਿ ॥੧॥ hukam rajāī chalanā nānak likhiā nāl .1. O Nanak! By obeying, the pre-ordained order of the Lord's will. Secondly, the astpadhi from which you quoted the Sant ka dokhi verses has this verse at the end: ਜਿਸ ਨੋ ਕ੍ਰਿਪਾ ਕਰੈ ਤਿਸੁ ਆਪਨ ਨਾਮੁ ਦੇਇ ॥ jis nō kripā karai tis āpan nām dēi . God gives His Name to those unto whom He shows His mercy. So ask for his mercy. Also check out the 7th Astpadi, which talks about the good effects of the sangat of a Sadhu: https://khojgurbani.com/shabad/271/709?highlighted_scripture_id=12007&highlighted_scripture_lang=gurmukhi&selected_content=gurbani I'm not getting into who is a "true" Sadhu in this post.
    • In langar it should be common sense for peopel to find a suitable space to sit. Normally in my local Singh Sabha gurdwara, there is enough space to sit, so I am able to find a space with enough space away from other people. There have been a few times, where there has been a lot of sangat and I have been forced onto a table.  In Slough and Southall Singh Sabha, Park Avenue, I will just sit near another group of men unless I am with family, but again there shouldn't be strict gender separation and instead common sense logic.
    • Yeh I could do to be honest. It's not really chardikala to be coming from the diwan hall and then sangat putting on shoes to go langar. I like sitting in the gurdwara with family, and there are spaces for this in bigger gurdwaras such as Slough, Southall, Coventry. In my current local area gurdwaras this is not really possible for weekly sangat, and also not for sangrand and gurpurb. Need to complain about these tendikalaUK practices  to be UK chardikala Singhs! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use