Jump to content

Why do so many Canadian Sikhs try to speak with "blaccents"?


Recommended Posts

Left Liberal whites who claim to be anti-racist are just as racist as the right wing in your face racists.

In some ways they are even more racist because at least you know where you stand with the overt racist

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Maybe because Jats are the only remaining group who are still actively alpha amongst the Sikh community.  We could also ask why are Jats the only group to aggressively take on Delhi in the protests.  

How much steroids and coke do these jut peasants need to take to make them feel alpha????  hahahahahaaaa!

Don’t say that bro you’re gonna hurt feelings of a certain ‘DollySingh’.  He still a hasn’t got over when his tribe got told leave by a few Kaleh armed with only sticks and stones from ‘Wakanda’.  Suc

Posted Images

3 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Left Liberal whites who claim to be anti-racist are just as racist as the right wing in your face racists.

In some ways they are even more racist because at least you know where you stand with the overt racist

Yeah bro you're quoting them again and you can't put me on a side except Degh Tegh Fateh. 

Nor can you respond to a point. Like your predecessors. 

And you like to make up what suits you, slander me with it, and continue...like your predecessors. 

No relationship with the truth ...like your predecessors. 

No spine...like your predecessors.

I might be a dog but there are three things I can smell. A wasp, a kkkracker and deceiver. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Jagsaw called it back in 2019:

 the white pale skinned man here playing at being a Sikh but, being a white man, possesses that inherent white trait of thinking he has the moral and intellectual high ground over you brown people - enough to lecture you on what you the brown people should be thinking.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Ranjeet01 said:

I think Jagsaw called it back in 2019:

 the white pale skinned man here playing at being a Sikh but, being a white man, possesses that inherent white trait of thinking he has the moral and intellectual high ground over you brown people - enough to lecture you on what you the brown people should be thinking.

Thank you jagsaw. You are your own biggest fan. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Ranjeet01 said:

I think Jagsaw called it back in 2019:

 the white pale skinned man here playing at being a Sikh but, being a white man, possesses that inherent white trait of thinking he has the moral and intellectual high ground over you brown people - enough to lecture you on what you the brown people should be thinking.

Yeah. Racism. Not Gurmat. That's not me telling you it's your Guru. 

It's just pathetic anyone has to remind you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Nothing triggers a white person than when you call them out on their racism. They shouldn't use Sikhi as cover for their white supremacism.

Applause. Take a bow bro. You're tuly... flexible...

When you get to Dharam Rai and he shows you how Akal prepared me for specifically this you're going to laugh your <banned word filter activated> off. But it is literally one of my more unique areas of expertise. You must hate it. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bro. Instead of the overplayed race bait threads you use to make a fuss, I want you to dig deep. You're truly talented. I need...like better work from you. I know its A worthy for the other kids ...but you and I know you're capable of so much better...so as...bright as this is... I'm..going to have to give you D and hope it inspires you to really...reach your full potential. 

And to be honest...this.... isn't even your best work this semester...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

I mean is that what you bond with your white masters over, you both agree at least "you" are not "black"?

Just brown. It's okay. "They know their place. They repeat what we tell them. Spout our views. Such a better parrot than those uppity aboriginals. Just can't die already so we can enjoy their country without looking at the evidence of our genocide of their culture.  Yeesh. What a reminder."

Give you a warm fuzzy?

Mate, I never said anything about Aboriganal Australians, they're fine. Sometimes, they get extra piveledge, which is fine considering what happen here around 50 years ago. 

I'm not saying white people are innocent, some of my mates have experienced racism but that was years ago, I've personally never experienced racism from white. And the white are not my masters.

The only black that I've had a problem with is those from Africa. I'm not saying all of them are bad and should be banished, but most of the crimes that happen are by afro black people (minus the eshays). The other point I was making is that unlike North America, the people here don't try to act like them or don't really talk like them, which means we are our own people, not whitewashed, and not blackwashed (if that's what you call what's happened to a lot of North American punjabis). 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

 This is VERY prevalent in California, your home state😂😂😂 especially in the bay area (Santa Clara, Hayward etc). As for Canada, it's quite true in Toronto area. Not as much in BC & Alberta. The Punjabis in BC are very active in their underworld, more so than any other diasporic community. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you've been unable to read between the lines and grasp the subtext of the article. It's a clear attempt at pitting Sikhs against some nebulous form of Islam, by equating medieval Mughal expansionism with its various contemporary terror-related forms. British-penned propaganda or a general West vs Islam perspective, it's doing exactly what you constantly highlight on this forum about us being "recruited" by outsiders as fodder.  The playful and almost throwaway tone of the article and its vernacular is also cringeworthy. Am I suggesting we leap into bed with Islam and its adherents? No. But I don't like attempts by outsiders trying to mine our painful and blood-soaked history to manipulate us into following whatever current strand of policy they've devised against one of the existential dangers facing them. Equally, intention counts for a lot. If the guy's aim was to flatter Sikhs and shed light on a quaint and once-proud warrior race, then fair enough. But I don't take things like this on face value. There's always a purpose behind it however faint. Your cheap little attempts at psycho-analysing and shaming me into conforming to your worldview isn't working and it never will. EDIT: Having just flicked through the website from which the article originates my suspicions were correct. It's a moderately right-leaning Spectator-esque online zine.
    • No, I just think you constantly over analyse the wrong stuff. This is just some simple bod 'boosted' interpretation of Sikh history from a purely physical perspective (as opposed to spiritual). What it seems to be trying to do is amplify Sikh bravery and independence in a very simplistic manner.  It's not dissimilar to what I've heard Sikh street guys talking just prior to going out to kick off with another group.  I don't think you can read very well, compared to a lot of stuff, at least this piece somewhat underscores a perspective that doesn't co-opt Sikhs to other causes. And if a brit white guy wrote this (below), he'd be being more honest than the vast majority of the rest of his people (even though the guy is obviously ignorant of the modern nature of the Sikh army under Sikh raj with his swords against canons comment). If he was a proper brit he'd be telling us about how grateful our lot were to be subjugated and used and abused by the colonialists: The Sikhs were better fighters than the Moghuls, when the numbers and the guns were anything like equal, and by the time the Brits arrived, they’d carved out their own state in the Punjab. They fought the Brits twice, swords against cannon, and were slaughtered, then flattered, then coopted—the classic Imperial method of dealing with brave but dumb cannon fodder, as in “Our dear Highlanders,” cannon fodder in cute kilts. 
    • So why would you want to keep dragging them back here, then?
    • If it was confirmed that a British white guy wrote that piece, you'd be all over it, castigating it as establishment propaganda designed to get us to fight under the banners of ex-imperial powers for their modern colonial escapades. You're very selective with what you choose to object to: it's not the actual substance of the message that annoys you but the vessel in which the message is delivered, yes?
    • I just think it's a simplified narrative designed to inspire a bit of fearlessness in Sikhs. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing.  There will always be some people who will misinterpret and maybe fly off the handle due to their own personality traits, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't have such accounts.  I tend to see these things as stepping stones or entry points for people to explore the ithihaas/culture in more depth.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use