Jump to content

People in UK will you be voting?


Singh1989
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Punjabiwolves said:

Now based on the Map Khalistan will be a Hindu Majority state and that too by a long way. it it will have the biggest Hindu  population outside of India not only that but it will also contain the Holiest city for Hindus (Haridwar ) come on now this map no sense . Will you guys be ok with Hindu majority Khalistan? will you guys be OK with Khalistan being a very important country for Hindus when in-fact you want to get away form this Hinduism and Hindu's 

How can the UN take a referendum seriously when the majority of this proposed Khalistan state citizens(Hindus in Punjab , Haryayna UP etc) cant vote on it when a Sikh in the UK who has never stepped foot in India can vote on it. 

That is a delusional and absurd map made by a group as equally delusional.

Nonetheless, at the heart of the Sikh desire for their own state is not some malevolent intentions for their fellow Hindu neighbours, it is a wish for the preservation of their way of life going into the future within the safety of a sovereign state. We don’t hate India or Hindus. We just want our remaining small piece of land. Kind of like how Pandavs were settling for a few villages while forfeiting their kingdom to their Kaurav cousins.

Even within any potential Sikh state there is no ill intention against our fellow Punjabi Hindu brothers. In any case, how can 1.5% Sikhs cause any real harm to Hindus or India? It’s more to do with preserving our existence. All we want is some form of sovereignty within our 1.5% land for our 1.5% kaum. Is it really asking for too much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jai Tegang! said:

That is a delusional and absurd map made by a group as equally delusional.

At the heart of the Sikh desire for their own state is not some malevolent intentions for their fellow Hindu neighbours, it is a wish for the preservation of their way of life going into the future within a sovereign state. We don’t hate India or Hindus. We just want a small piece of land to call our own. Kind of like how Pandavs were settling for a few villages while forfeiting their kingdom to their Kaurav cousins.

Even within any potential Sikh state there is no ill intention against our fellow Punjabi Hindu brothers. In any case, how can 1.5% Sikhs cause any real harm to Hindus or India? It’s more to do with preserving our existence. All we want is some form of sovereignty within our 1.5% land for our 1.5% kaum. Is it really asking for too much?

Sometimes the only way to get a piece is own the whole pie. 

If you ask for water they'll be happy to spit on your grave. Nobody is going to give any percent. 

So we have to ask for too much. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Punjabiwolves said:

Have you seen this Map of the proposed Khalistan? 

XjXT8HgxWgQAqPGr0Z3jRWl31n5-MQ_rQUFnS8Hl

?????? you can't make this up. On a side note, I guess these guys just want to carve up India. Why isn't Sri Nankana Sahib and Sri Kartarpur Sahib there? And who in their right mind would have their capital practically surrounded by another country. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, dharamyudh said:

You guys thought Gurdwara committees were bad? Wait until you hear of a Sikh democratic country. Imagine the SGPC running a country. 

The same old tired excuse. We can't run a Gurdwara hence we won't be able to run a country blah blah blah. Either you are a Hindu pretending to be a Sikh or a self hating Sikh., Which one is it? But whichever one of these you are, you are certainly a first class f&dhu as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, proactive said:

The same old tired excuse. We can't run a Gurdwara hence we won't be able to run a country blah blah blah. Either you are a Hindu pretending to be a Sikh or a self hating Sikh., Which one is it? But whichever one of these you are, you are certainly a first class fudhu as well. 

I think we can do it. @dharamyudh is half right. Right to be concerned given the state of things now, but I hope ultimately wrong that it's beyond us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, dharamyudh said:

?????? you can't make this up. On a side note, I guess these guys just want to carve up India. Why isn't Sri Nankana Sahib and Sri Kartarpur Sahib there? And who in their right mind would have their capital practically surrounded by another country. 

Yes. Must be bigger. Although I hear those that just want a tiny bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Yes. Must be bigger. Although I hear those that just want a tiny bit. 

He's a bandar, the two excuses he has used to justify us remain slaves of India are the exact same that the RW Hindus use. one that we can't run a Gurdwara hence how can we run a country and the other why aren't we demanding Lahore and Nankana Sahib as well as parts of his beloved Hindustan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, proactive said:

He's a bandar, the two excuses he has used to justify us remain slaves of India are the exact same that the RW Hindus use. one that we can't run a Gurdwara hence how can we run a country and the other why aren't we demanding Lahore and Nankana Sahib as well as parts of his beloved Hindustan.

The systems by which the Gurudwara are run are not Gurmat. It's collonial, followed by hindu nationalist intervention. 

It does need to be changed. 

It's just no argument against Khalistan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use