Jump to content

Yet Another Group Of Anti-sikh Thugs Causing Fights In Gurdwara Over Committee


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

Once the bibi was pushed rightly pushed away it all kicked off. I MAN PROTECT WOMAN mentality started the fight.


I think Gurdwara leadership contests should be in the ring and not in a election.

Every faction who wants to join should be allowed to take part in a battle royal. The last one standing is the winner.

Good idea providing it's not the hired goons fighting but the actual committee members. Blunt swords will have to be used mind :tease: !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

I think Gurdwara leadership contests should be in the ring and not in a election.

Every faction who wants to join should be allowed to take part in a battle royal. The last one standing is the winner.

I highly doubt most of these guys would fight in a real fight. Similar to the Pre-Free Akal Takht fighting themselves just a few years ago during a talk.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once the bibi was pushed rightly pushed away it all kicked off. I MAN PROTECT WOMAN mentality started the fight.

Good idea providing it's not the hired goons fighting but the actual committee members. Blunt swords will have to be used mind :tease: !

I think they should use those giant cotton swabs in Gladiators game show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they should use those giant cotton swabs in Gladiators game show.

I reckon they should have ZERO podiums , ZERO speechs in darbar ....GURU JI'S words are the only thing that should be in that Darbar and their vichaar ...They also should remove Maya da Golak and replace it with Naam da Golak - when you enter Darbar you do parkarma , and matha tek submitting your continuous naam jap whilst in sangat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

but who is Katniss Kaur?

If Katniss was compared to Sikh people, it would be that person fighting against the system. (Many Puratan Singhs and Kaurs), none of these folk fighting for the position would be comparable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use