Jump to content

What will Western Sikhs do when the whip-hand becomes Islamic in the next few decades?


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, CHaamCHrick said:

And produce more illiterate and pendoo janwars and gawaars to inherit the earth. The Sikh koam is already brimming  with them, there is no need to pollute our planet earth any further! Listen to  Greta Tintin Eleonora Ernman Thunberg for further information. Bless her.

maybe in the uk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/17/2020 at 7:48 PM, TigerForce1 said:

We don’t need to breed ourselves into significance!  All we need is ‘one’ Parcharak/Leader that can connect with the masses and before you know it, the numbers will multiply faster than anything you have seen.  Sounds familiar to the great leader that emerged in the 1980’s and changed the landscape of Punjab and the Diaspora.  Have faith and pass on Sikhi to your children and spread it to those who know nothing about us and watch everything that happens before your eyes. Stay Chardikala!

We need someone like Akali Phoola Singh and Sant Jarnail Singh Ji. Back in the 80’s , loads of people were taking Amrit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I heard or what Jugraj ji said, Saint Sikhs will endorn the thrones of western countries before establishing Sikh raj in Punjab/India. Punjab belongs to Sikhs. Guru ji promised rule to 40 mukte who left him during the battle but returned on pursuance by Mai Bahgo ji. When they asked for Guru Gobind Singh's forgiveness he promised them rule. I salute your desire for Sikh kingdom. "Sehaj pakkay so mithaa hoye". We all have a calling and have a unique path to follow. Vaheguru ji are just giving us time to unite and understand each other better so we can come together without bitterness or any complexes or discrimination among ourselves. Everybody has different kind of independence in making the choices in life, we all have a different rapport with the Guru. Time is right for Sikh Raj if you follow the change in the world but it becomes immediate if the whole world pray to God for freedom from exploitation, falsehood and kalyug. Khalsa force is underconstruction and undertraining under our noses we just need to open our eyes. Its not about Sikhi only, there are lots of sikhs in other religions too. When we will fight all sikhs from various religions will come together. Sikhism can unite the whole world. Do not misjudge the power of Sikhi and realm of Sikhism. Sikhism is love for God and fight against injustice and anything against humanity. Just be patient and ask Guru ji for guidance please. Stay humble and alert! Stay blessed! Raj karega ga Khalsa Aaki rahay na koye. I have been waiting for 40 years for my calling. Bhai Jugraj Singh ji is not gone, he is gone to realise the next step into the insight he has given us. Do not underestimate the power of panthic Shahids. Just practice Sikhi and be ready to fight together. The time is almost here. Only Guru can lighten the path and enlighten our buddhi. Seek Him and His guidance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, CHaamCHrick said:

Still, way better than rubbish India, especially the Punjab....where men beat their women with a stick!

Stop writing rubbish especially on issues you know nothing about.

The table below shows is from the 2006 Family Health Survey from India. The table shows that Sikh females experience less physical violence than Hindu, Muslim, Christian and Buddhist females. Only Jains have a better score but that is because their chief tenet is non-violence and they tend to be the wealthiest and most educated community in India.  Any physical violence is bad but we need to stop accepting anti-Sikh media's propagation of Sikh males as domestic abusers.

My pdf editor is not working so I used print screen.

 

image.thumb.png.f88b0cb4d9f522a24c752179bce5b691.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those not so good at reading data in tabular form. 26.1% of Sikhs females have suffered physical violence since the age of 15. 33.7% of Hindu and 34.6% of Muslim and 27.8% of Christian women suffered physical violence since the age of 15. The data which is most significant is that while 3.9% of Hindu, 4.9% of Muslim and 3% of Christian females suffer physical violence OFTEN, only 1.5% of Sikh females suffer physical violence often. 

Buddhists have the most in both these data sets and this could be because in the last 3 decades a lot of lower caste and poor Hindus have become Buddhists and so it may be that this section of Buddhist society commits the most physical violence towards their females. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some might be wondering that because this data is from 2006 then the situation might be that because in the last decade Punjab has had a lot of drug and alcohol abuse that the data for Sikhs might be worst now than in 2006.

The table below is from the NFHS in India from 2015.

The Sikhs are still the least likely to engage in physical abuse of their females than other Indian communities apart from Jains. 

image.thumb.png.13af6d9a1b84fab219b9591c5ab698da.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/20/2020 at 2:41 AM, proactive said:

Some might be wondering that because this data is from 2006 then the situation might be that because in the last decade Punjab has had a lot of drug and alcohol abuse that the data for Sikhs might be worst now than in 2006.

The table below is from the NFHS in India from 2015.

The Sikhs are still the least likely to engage in physical abuse of their females than other Indian communities apart from Jains. 

image.thumb.png.13af6d9a1b84fab219b9591c5ab698da.png

 

Another amazing post by proactive ji.There are so many lies being spread about Sikhs which is propagated by mainstream media. These lies include:

-Suicide rate in India is highest among Sikhs

-female infanticide in India being the highest among Sikhs.

-Sikh male is the most abusive against his womenfolk.

-Sikhs started the partition riots. 

 

Sadly these lies are further perpetuated by Sikhs themselves who like to bring everyone on panic mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no official data released regarding suicide rates in India  by religion but there is suicide rate per state and union territory. In 2015 the national rate is 10.6 suicides per 100,000 population. By State Punjab is 3.7 suicides per 100,000. Haryana has 13 suicides per 100,000 Chandigarh is 6.9 and Himachal is 7.7 and Delhi is 8.8. Rajasthan is 4.8.  So In the northern region Punjab suicide rate is below neighbouring states. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use