Jump to content

Guru gobind singh adopted children


Arsh1469
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Arsh1469 said:

Guru ji adopted 4 childern.

https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Zoravar_Singh_Palit#p-personal

Anyone have more information or know any Sikh historical granth that does?

Most Sikhiwiki articles would mention a source for their articles. This article does not show any source!

Also, I’ve been lucky enough to listen to 10th Patshai''s history, from numerous sources. I have never heard this account from anyone. I have never read any of this in any books either.

The fact that the article doesn’t quote a source, makes me question the authenticity of this article.

The only adopted son by Mata Sundar Kaur Ji, is of Ajit Singh. Alit Singh resembled Sahibzada Ajit Singh. When Mata Sundar Kaur Ji came to know of all four Sahibzade's Shahadat. She wanted to adopt this Ajit Singh to remind her of Sahibzada Ajit Singh.

Despite Guru Ji's advise against the adoption, Mata Ji still went ahead. And took him to Delhi, while Guru Ji left for Nanded.

This account can be found in Sri Gurprtap Suraj Granth. Written by Choodamani Kavi Santokh Singh.

By the way, Choodamani means...the most precious jewel in the Crown...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have doubts of these other four as they would have been metioned in bhaiJaitha ji's writings too and other hazoori Singhs writings

The Ajit Singh adopted by Mata Sundar ji ended up being the antithesis of a son of Guru ji and not worthy of that moniker

siki wiki is run by 3ho types and therefore sikhs should take everything posted as possibly tainted and find out via our own research as they also have links back to RSS (sharing same swamis/pandits as Indira and RSS/modi)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/12/2020 at 7:29 PM, jkvlondon said:

I have doubts of these other four as they would have been metioned in bhaiJaitha ji's writings too and other hazoori Singhs writings

The Ajit Singh adopted by Mata Sundar ji ended up being the antithesis of a son of Guru ji and not worthy of that moniker

siki wiki is run by 3ho types and therefore sikhs should take everything posted as possibly tainted and find out via our own research as they also have links back to RSS (sharing same swamis/pandits as Indira and RSS/modi)

You realise the chalakhi they're trying to perpetuate, don't you? It's SO transparent! They think so little of Sikhs.

Basically, if this is accepted, in the future they'll claim THESE youngsters were the ones who gave Shaheedi because Guru Ji "protected" his biological sons from dying on the battlefield. It's an attempt to defame Guru Ji, his overall sacrifice, and the bravery of the Sahibzade.

They're playing on the narrative about that Singh who resembled Guru Ji, who'd occasionally venture out to confuse the enemy. With this they've taken it to the next level. 

It's also quite telling they've chosen to focus on the Ramgharia background of this new "son". My theory is anyone who objects to it will be labelled as a pro-caste supporter. Classic shaming tactic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have in the past read about Guru ji letting Mata Sundri adopt a boy from Delhi, but he didn't turn out to be good and after Guru ji left the earth the adopted son declared himself Guru. 

So many of the Guru relatives used to declare themselves the Guru and many of the sangat used to believe them. Not that different to the fake Gurus of today. Guru Arjan Dev Jis brother declared himself Guru and later tried poisoning Guru Hargobind Sahib ji.

Every single story from our ithiaas is as relevant today as it was back then. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/12/2020 at 6:50 PM, MokhamSingh said:

Most Sikhiwiki articles would mention a source for their articles. This article does not show any source!

Also, I’ve been lucky enough to listen to 10th Patshai''s history, from numerous sources. I have never heard this account from anyone. I have never read any of this in any books either.

The fact that the article doesn’t quote a source, makes me question the authenticity of this article.

The only adopted son by Mata Sundar Kaur Ji, is of Ajit Singh. Alit Singh resembled Sahibzada Ajit Singh. When Mata Sundar Kaur Ji came to know of all four Sahibzade's Shahadat. She wanted to adopt this Ajit Singh to remind her of Sahibzada Ajit Singh.

Despite Guru Ji's advise against the adoption, Mata Ji still went ahead. And took him to Delhi, while Guru Ji left for Nanded.

This account can be found in Sri Gurprtap Suraj Granth. Written by Choodamani Kavi Santokh Singh.

By the way, Choodamani means...the most precious jewel in the Crown...

 

Ganda Singh mentions this adopted son of Guru ji in his footnotes of Sainapati's Gursobha. The adopted Zorowar Singh sometimes has been confused with Sahibzadha Zorowar Singh. The adopted son was one of the few that actually managed to fight his way out of the cordon placed around Chamkaur. 

There is a Persian eye witness account  of his death too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Names of the creator that are used in Gurbani, were in existence before any Avtars etc… Raghu…means the the place where the Atma resides, where breathing takes place… Nath means…the master, the creator, etc…
    • Sir my question is why has occurred the need for modern vyakhakaars say this mean this , why our guru patshah used used those word  which are now being explained why did guru create confusion ?
    • Was listening to Sant Ji's katha on youtube.  Sant ji stated apart from the traditional raags, there is nothing wrong if Kirtan is sung in other NON - Raags set up by our Guru Ji's.  His example: Think of poison in a bowl.  Drinking the poison then blaming the bowl is silly. The poison is bad not the bowl. Likewise, we will never call a bowl Amrit once it contains Amrit init. Sameway it's not the raags being good / bad... it's WHAT we put into those raags. How many times Kirtan was sung but on a track of sum Bollywood tune? It is happening in Gurudwara by Raagis! Youtube also has Kaweshri jatha singing history of 1984, on Dr Dre's - Still Dre track.  Rap instrumental/ Bolly tunes stand neutral. We can either put bad things and sing with our own remixes and lyrics... or we can recreate to sing Shabads of Gurbabi, kirtan and Sikh Prachaar over them. 
    • Everything in Gurbani points us towards the Atma. Atma and Parmatma are the same… Atama and Parmatma is the source that creates and causes everything… What have the following items got in common? A fan. A television. A fridge. A radio. A computer..? These things are powered by electricity. Without electricity these things are lifeless. It’s the electricity that causes these things to function… Atma is the source of energy that allows everything to happen.    without Atma, we are lifeless… Call this Atama RAGUNATH…call this Atma by any other name…the fact remains that it’s the life force energy… Dieties also have the same Atma as humans, but they still part of the creation, and not the creator…  
    • Hi I want to know who’s ragunath in gurbani Hindu claim this word appear for ram chandra if we read guru teg bahadur maharaj salok maharaj clearly rejecting ram gayo ravan geo but at the last pangti Kahu naanak īh bipaṭi mai tek ēyk ragɦunaaṭɦ ॥55॥ Says Nanak, in this calamity, the Lord alone is my support who is this ragunaath why would maharaj use ragunath as refrence for god?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use