Jump to content

How sikhs helped the jaats of bharatpur


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

What do you mean by this? 

Communism/atheism so your soul can be taken stopping your reincarnation/ascension to God. 

But you must believe in it, agree to it. For that they can torture you using Directed Energy Weapons via Artificial Intelligence that can use all you data from your body - thoughts, feelings, state (sleeping, awake, breath rate, temp  etc). They can also control your body via direct thoughts,  signals to your brain to move your body or influence your thoughts. 

Hence your awareness is of paramount importance.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm baffled with jut politics. Only a couple of years ago, when these very same jaats of Haryana were rioting and blocking off the roads, Sikhs on this very forum were slating them for being lowlife scum. Fast forward to now, and there has been a volte face, and people are talking like the above.

Maintaining and getting Sikh numbers up is obviously important. But the people under discussion here are the descendants of the very same ones that didn't even show loyalty to their Panjabi heritage (let alone Sikhi) when they put themselves down as Hindi speakers around the Panjab Suba movement. 

Are most of these people converting out of economic/political expediency rather than any heartfelt conviction for Sikhi? If so, having half-hearted opportunist 'Sikhs' like that could easily come back to haunt us.

Or on the flipside, maybe this is the same way many juts of Panjab converted i.e. economic/political reasons? What do you think? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, proactive said:

 

Their role in the pre-1966 Punjab was not anti-Punjabi, they did not disown Punjabi like the Punjabi Hindus, their language was always Bagri and Haryanvi which were classed as Western Hindustani in British times and as dialects of Hindi after 1947. Bagri has in the last decade has been classed as a dialect of Punjabi and hence this has led to Punjabi becoming a majority in some parts of northern Haryana such as Fatehabad district. So your accusation is not true. 

 

 

 

 

 

You speak as though Punjabi does not belong to Hindus! They speak both Hindi and Punjabi - one as National language and other as Regional language.  In between there are many local languages and dialects. But they prefer to learn written Hindi due to wider use and it being closer to Sanskrit and their Shastras.  Punjabi wss popularised by Sikhs as the Granths are written in it, otherwise there would be little incentive in learning it. In fact failing to learn Hindi has probably led to the mass exodus of Sikhs abroad as they can't easily relocate within India. 

So your statement of disowning Punjabi is not quite correct. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, proactive said:

There is absolutely nothing wrong in the mass conversion of a people for economical or political reasons. This is how all religions have progressed historically. Conversion through conviction only occurs in individuals or small groups. If the mass conversion occurs for economic or political reasons then within just one generation the new religion becomes so ingrained that it is unlikely that they would ever revert back to their old religion.

 

 

 

 

 

A new religion or panth is created for all sorts of reasons, but is mostly due to a particular need or agenda that involves perceived injustices or economic/political reasons. 

Which means as soon as a new need is identified then a new panth will be created. As has already happened even within Sikhs due to so many disagreements and influences that are still unresolved. 

Before accepting new recruits you should be clear on the existing setup and aims of the panth and whether it is acceptable for the foreseeable future. 

Recent news demonstrates that it seems to have lost its raison d'etre by embracing the very group it was set up to defend against. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, proactive said:

Agreed these Jaats are on the rougher end of the Jat spectrum but their interest in Sikhi seems genuine. Like Sikhs Jats they also have a perception of themselves as a people rather than a caste and as such they feel greater solidarity for all Jats then say a Dalit in Haryana would have with a Dalit in Punjab. This solidarity as well as the desire to progress economically and politically is what is pulling them towards Sikhi. 

You say that, but that wasn't the impression you get when they were rioting last time, SIkh juts on this forum were sl@gging them off hardcore. 

I might be wrong but weren't there also killings of Sikhs in these regions post Indira's sending off? That's what I heard, but I might be wrong though. You seem to be better informed, is this true?

Quote

Their role in the pre-1966 Punjab was not anti-Punjabi, they did not disown Punjabi like the Punjabi Hindus, their language was always Bagri and Haryanvi which were classed as Western Hindustani in British times and as dialects of Hindi after 1947. Bagri has in the last decade has been classed as a dialect of Punjabi and hence this has led to Punjabi becoming a majority in some parts of northern Haryana such as Fatehabad district. So your accusation is not true. 

Okay I hope you're right and not trying to be some sort of PR agent for these people. 

 

Quote

There is absolutely nothing wrong in the mass conversion of a people for economical or political reasons. This is how all religions have progressed historically. Conversion through conviction only occurs in individuals or small groups. If the mass conversion occurs for economic or political reasons then within just one generation the new religion becomes so ingrained that it is unlikely that they would ever revert back to their old religion.

I hope so! The current situation in India for Sikhs in Panjab seems largely untenable. Spreading strongly outwards in India is something that needs to take place. But I don't know about your opinion of converts not reverting, or converting to something else. All the recent isaih conversions taking place points otherwise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They are taking over from within. They knew in our Gurus time they couldn't win by force so now they're trying to come into countries acting all "working" and then they spread their faith from within. We were here long before them and the gorreh love us. They know we fought for them and that we are loyal, hardworking and truthful.  To them, anyone who doesn't "submit" (that's what muslim actually means) is an enemy. Just like Aurangzeb and Wazir Khan, all the way to when they would groom Apnian to convert them in London back in the 90s. They can make their prayers discreet but they CHOOSE not to. They want to "normalise" their faith. Once everyone's familiar with it then they will try to force it on people even more. Not many will convert to a completely foreign idea but one that everyone knows already may give them a chance
    • it was. Look up his picture he looks like the spawn of the devil, literally. I don't get scared easily but I actually had a jump scare googling him he looks like pure evil 
    • Paaji if you look carefully when Southall was mainly Sikh (when the Sangat first settled) those areas were great. Ilford is a prime example. Today everyone knows that place is a dump but back when it was just apne and jews the place was spotless. Problem is in London, it's always Jews in an area first and the Sikhs come to stay for about 20 years. But then the <banned word filter activated> move in we all run like it's the plague (we all know why). Same thing happened to Southall, now we're losing it to Somalis rapidly. Issue is that Sikhs make an area good, but when the <banned word filter activated> come we all move and leave it for them to ruin. We need to flock an area and STICK TO IT like they do. Had Sikhs not left Ilford and sold houses to them It would still be okay.
    • Let them try to come for us. Guru Gobind Singh Ji maharaj gave us a Dastar to stand out and a shastar to defend it. Package deal. Singhs say in schools "another kid pulled my joora down" then I say "tere Shastar kithe si, Maharaj ne sanu ik talwar ditta si, pagg nu rakshe vaaste" We're Shastar dhari for a reason. To protect ourselves and others. And for Singhs in the region, what is stopping them getting 15-20 Singhs together and going down to protect our Gurdware and even other places of faith like we're meant to? Happened in Ilford back in like 2013 with the racist riots, a hundred Singhs and Kaurs flooded Karamsar Gurdwara to guard it. Sadly our Sardaari has been lost apparently.
    • We're still here bro don't worry 💪 . The Singhs on Reddit aren't as nice or knowledgeable as those on here, I don't really like them. For me, this site was a staple of London singhs back in the 2000s which I love. Back when we repped Patkas, Shahi Turbans and Dumalla Sahibs instead of a little black durag tied w a patka cos we're scared to look like real Singhs with a joora on our heads like Maharaj told us to and rep the panth
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use