Jump to content

Sikh Clash With Police In London


StarStriker
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'd never call them traitors, hence the quote marks. But you know the Indian media will go overboard in their labelling of such personnel.

Regarding your point, who votes in these personalities time and time again? If the Punjabi electorate have the collective memory of a goldfish, then what to do? We can't vote out Badal and his chums.

ok goldfish analogy aside what real political choices did /do Punjabis have now

Akali - hahahah no!

Congress- they are still washing their blood spattered hands

Bjp- also covered in blood but pretend that they had nothing to do with the continuous genocide

AAP- Bhagwant mann looked OK but then he turned up to Shaheedi smagam drunk today , Phoolka is gone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok goldfish analogy aside what real political choices did /do Punjabis have now

Akali - hahahah no!

Congress- they are still washing their blood spattered hands

Bjp- also covered in blood but pretend that they had nothing to do with the continuous genocide

AAP- Bhagwant mann looked OK but then he turned up to Shaheedi smagam drunk today , Phoolka is gone

I've very little knowledge of Punjabi politics. I didn't know things were that bad.

I guess a 'None of the above' choice is out of the question, lol?

That aside, you must've heard of tales of Badal buying votes with something as simple as bottles of alcohol for the drunks and druggies that populate Punjab? In the face of such retrograde attitudes the task to turn the situation around is an uphill one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've very little knowledge of Punjabi politics. I didn't know things were that bad.

I guess a 'None of the above' choice is out of the question, lol?

That aside, you must've heard of tales of Badal buying votes with something as simple as bottles of alcohol for the drunks and druggies that populate Punjab? In the face of such retrograde attitudes the task to turn the situation around is an uphill one.

That's another problem with apnay, especially rural ones. They have this strong tendency to continually blame outsiders and stubbornly refuse to see the part they play in a rotten situation. It's like critical self-reflection is a unknown concept amongst them.

I mean for God's sake, Badal has been persistently voted in by Sikhs - and no small number in electoral terms.

I'm telling you, we regularly screw ourselves over - but apnay have such frail egos, that facing up to this truth is too much for them. So they'd rather continually bleat on about amorphous outside agencies so they don't have to confront their own embarrassing kartootaan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's another problem with apnay, especially rural ones. They have this strong tendency to continually blame outsiders and stubbornly refuse to see the part they play in a rotten situation. It's like critical self-reflection is a unknown concept amongst them.

I mean for God's sake, Badal has been persistently voted in by Sikhs - and no small number in electoral terms.

I'm telling you, we regularly screw ourselves over - but apnay have such frail egos, that facing up to this truth is too much for them. So they'd rather continually bleat on about amorphous outside agencies so they don't have to confront their own embarrassing kartootaan.

Their Chankian mindset will not accept their own faults because they think that it will create weakness which means that they will be taken advantage by others.

Also it means they lose face which means other people's perception on them will change. Perception is everything amongst our people.

By being self - critical also means they have to be honest, which is also an alien concept.

Chanakya once said "a crooked tree gets cut last". A lot of our people have that mindset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to a 1994 estimate, Punjabis (Sikhs and non-Sikhs) comprised 10 to 15 percent of all ranks in the Indian Army, although the state contained less than 3% of the country's population. The Indian government does not release religious or ethnic origins of the military personnel, but a 1991 report by Tim McGirk estimated that 20 percent of Indian Army officers were Sikhs.

Sikh soldiers did mutiny in 1984 but when you have the likes of Badal, Longowal, Tohra, Amarinder, KPS Gill, General Brar, SPGC, Akal Takht etc.etc. controlling Punjab & Sikhism as their own personal domain (Sikhism doesn't even get a look in) what point does a rebellion serve? Who are the real traitors of Sikhism?

Issue Date June 30, 1984

It began at Sriganganagar, a border town in Rajasthan where over 400 jawans of 9 Sikh Light Infantry rebelled. This was followed by the mutiny at Ramgarh near Ranchi in Bihar where, charged by rumours that women were being raped by the army in Punjab, 1,438 recruits revolted, killing Brigadier R.C. Puri, the commandant, and escaped with weapons. They surrendered after bloody gun battles in fiv..,

Bro they wont do much, of course some will, but it wont make much of a difference. Your examples show about 2,000 revolted, lets just say upwards of 5,000 revolted across the country, considering there 150,000+ Sikhs in the military, you can see its a mere 3% only.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bro they wont do much, of course some will, but it wont make much of a difference. Your examples show about 2,000 revolted, lets just say upwards of 5,000 revolted across the country, considering there 150,000+ Sikhs in the military, you can see its a mere 3% only.

Wat a waste of life, singhs givin their life to protect borders for a country who doesnt protect their own ppl lives for starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wat a waste of life, singhs givin their life to protect borders for a country who doesnt protect their own ppl lives for starters.

I agree, but like the other brother said, they worry about themselves and their families first now. What will they gain by throwing away their lives only so that 10 years down the road theri sacrifice is forgotten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently a group of people blocked the road which caused the clash with police. This is not the sort of publicity the community needs, the media will pick up on anything negative don't give them an excuse.

Why did this group of people mentioned block the road ? Not a very clever thing to do is it.

EDIT: seen unconfirmed report on Facebook that police took a Singh's dastaar off and broke a Nishaan Sahib. No video footage to prove this.

I too saw that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too saw that.

there is video footage of all incidents , plus statements by the organisers that the Police had been given adequate notice of possible numbers and type of protest but they 'failed' to create a safe area to accomodate the people arriving . They could have cordoned of two lanes next to pavement and this way space for sangat and space for traffic flow would have been there. The other interesting thing to note the same afternoon protesters about allowing refugees into the country set of smoke bombs and were aggressive in a Major railway station but there was not the number of police or the type of force used to disperse the protest . There were no horses, no kettling or arrests despite items been thrown by protesters and aggression. Makes it quite clear that sending in the horses, kettling and arrests on Sikhs at the peaceful protest were done for an audience , to order . Time to stop being naive governments are interested in three things : power , control and Money and we cannot supply them with anything so they will use us how they can to get their aims.

http://news.sky.com/story/1575698/smoke-bombs-thrown-at-pro-refugees-protest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use