Muslim Friend Wants To Become A Sikh But She Has Questions

[13Mirch]

The existence of ISIS is expediting Western designs on the Middle East, yes, and its existence is also convenient to the Turks and the Arabs. But neither of those things prove that any of these powers had a hand in setting up ISIS.

I think ISIS haven't attacked Israel yet because they're all talk. That's all any of these Islamic groups are, and all they ever will be, because their worldview is too backward to give rise to the kind of civilization that would be scientifically/technologically/militarily advanced enough to go toe-to-toe with the West or Israel. Contrary to all the media hype, the military threat posed by these terrorists is negligible.

There are two plausible outcomes for the West in relation to this. One, let ISIS and Islam fizzle out in the deserts from whence both arose or two step up security and follow a policy of non-interference; that way they can avoid another 9/11.

[13Mirch]

Bush is not blameless for his bad reputation. He would have had a great legacy had he just focused on fighting terrorism. But then he got carried away and destroyed Iraq killing half a million Iraqis during the US led invasion alone. His invasion resulted in creation of Al Qaida of Iraq under Zarqawi which has now become ISIS under Baghdadi.

Iraq had nothing to do with fighting terrorism. But WASP leadership under Bush Blaire had to ruin everything amd today we can see the disastrous results. These guys remind me of the WASP governor generals like Delhousie who destroyed the Sikh empire for no reason other than to furthur their imperialism.

Given, but it is also said that the UN verified that Hussain possessed Antrax, a carcinogenic substance, which he was planning to utilize in missile building.

[Guest Jacfsing2]

Bush is not blameless for his bad reputation. He would have had a great legacy had he just focused on fighting terrorism. But then he got carried away and destroyed Iraq killing half a million Iraqis during the US led invasion alone. His invasion resulted in creation of Al Qaida of Iraq under Zarqawi which has now become ISIS under Baghdadi.

Iraq had nothing to do with fighting terrorism. But WASP leadership under Bush Blaire had to ruin everything amd today we can see the disastrous results. These guys remind me of the WASP governor generals like Delhousie who destroyed the Sikh empire for no reason other than to furthur their imperialism.

Iraq betrayed the U.S. alliance with them, (in the Iran-Iraq war we helped them); however, Saddam was mass killing the Kurds, (comparing him to the Sikh empire is crazy, the Singhs weren't mass murderers). Also Saddam Hussein was a tyrant to his own people willing to make "weapons of mass destruction", Bush stopped another 9/11 from happening.

[Jeevan]

You can argue over this all night long but there will be no end to hair-splitting. Sehajdharis are not fully Sikhs as in they are not Amrtidhari and by that not recognized as being ideologically oriented or ideologically oriented enough. Rather than jumping the gun why don't you comprehend what I write before attempting to impose the cart before the horse? Secondly, this matter can be scrutinized in another thread. Let u not attempt to divert this one.

[Jeevan]

Rehat Maryada

Section One

Chapter 1

The Definition of a Sikh

Article 1

Any human being who faithfully believes in

(I) One Immortal Being

(ii)Tenant Gurus, from Guru Nanak to Guru Gobind Singh

(iii) The Guru Granth Sahib

There is alot more but essentialy 80% of Sikhs are not Amritdhari.

[13Mirch]

Rehat Maryada

Section One

Chapter 1

The Definition of a Sikh

Article 1

Any human being who faithfully believes in

(I) One Immortal Being

(ii)Tenant Gurus, from Guru Nanak to Guru Gobind Singh

(iii) The Guru Granth Sahib

There is alot more but essentialy 80% of Sikhs are not Amritdhari.

Maryada has evolved. Do we still have the tenet that a Sikh should not work for an individual who adorns a topi? Like I said there can be no end to the hair splitting and another thread will have to suffice to preserve the essentials of this one.

[Guest Jacfsing2]

Rehat Maryada

Section One

Chapter 1

The Definition of a Sikh

Article 1

Any human being who faithfully believes in

(I) One Immortal Being

(ii)Tenant Gurus, from Guru Nanak to Guru Gobind Singh

(iii) The Guru Granth Sahib

There is alot more but essentialy 80% of Sikhs are not Amritdhari.

Isn't one of the things to believe in the Amrit Sanchar?

[jkvlondon]

Isn't one of the things to believe in the Amrit Sanchar?

yes it is ...for now

[Jonny101]

Iraq betrayed the U.S. alliance with them, (in the Iran-Iraq war we helped them); however, Saddam was mass killing the Kurds, (comparing him to the Sikh empire is crazy, the Singhs weren't mass murderers). Also Saddam Hussein was a tyrant to his own people willing to make "weapons of mass destruction", Bush stopped another 9/11 from happening.

Seriously how gullible can some of us get. You seriously believe in WASP lies and justifications for destroying Iraq? What about the half a million Iraqi civilians that us led invasion killed?

And I was not comparing Iraq to the Sikh empire. I was comparing the WASP invaders who destroyed our country to the WASP invaders who destroyed Iraq. They always invade using false justifications as pretexts to their invasion.

Read Prof Ganda Singh's book on how the British conquered Punjab. They would encourage Syad Ahmad Barelvi and Shah Ismail to carry out the first known Salafist(Wahhabi) insurgency in Punjab. Read their secret reports sent by their spies who would encourage the Pathans to rise up in Jihad against the Sikhs. Read about how they tried to incite Muslims of Abottabad to rebel against the Sikhs.

WASP leadership has been playing the same game using same tactics for the last 300 years all over the world. Back then it was Pax Britanica today it is Pax Americana.

Thing about Muslims is that Sikhs know exactly who and what they are. That's why Sikhs have rarely been tricked by them. And likewise they also know us so you can say Sikhs and Muslims have an understanding of each other. But none of us know how the chalaak WASP mind works. They will pretend to be your friend while at the same time sending spies and encouraging insurgencies in your country.

Once they have you down then they try to use you as they used Sikhs for a 100 years as soldiers to fight Muslims and other wars. Had it not been for Sikhs the British would have lost India in 1857. Or look at how Sikh soldiers in the British army fought against freedom loving Pathans in their numerous wars in Afghanistan and NW Frontier(remember Battle of Saragarhi). And when it came to reward Sikhs for 100 years of service by restoring our country that they stole from us, they ditched us and told us to chose between Hindus and Muslims.

So for any Sikh to justify the games being played by WASP leaders today is proof Sikhs never learn from history. We always get fooled.

[MisterrSingh]

Isn't one of the things to believe in the Amrit Sanchar?

That's a rather non-committal word in the context of the Amrit sanchar, isn't it, lol? "Believe." Whoever wrote that sounds like an expert in legalese.