Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, SinghPunjabSingh said:

1. Agreed but do you agree that actually the indigenous natives have greater title upon the Land than their Treaty rights would imply?

2. Wanting historically oppressed communities that have suffered from Christian and Islamic Slavery for hundreds of years to benefit from equal academic, health and justice = Sikhi = Sarbat da Bhala. White and Muslim culture was to oppress those same oppressed communities. That's why Sikhi is unique and why millions of kaaleh would become Sikhi if we did very basic levels of parchaar to point out that Sikhi opposes Slavery and racial discrimination.

3. If you are talking about grooming then give it 10 years in Mississauga and Milton and places and you will see that grooming occurs wherever Muslims achieve a critical mass within local population demographics.

not worried about grooming we are already aware of it and has taken place here already media highlighted it next door in alberta its occuring in lethbridge and calgary. What im talking about is SIkhs become fully assimilated having no fight in them and become tanned white ppl 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 237
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

So I've been lurking on the forum as a guest for a few weeks and I am absolutely appalled by the response of the far left to this issue.  I was actually meaning on starting a similar thread on this to

Because that's what other US Sikhs have reported. It's not hard to look through first-hand accounts. One of the Sikh elderly who got attacked described his attacker as 'kaala' and OFC some retarded li

I've had issues and seen issues from all types of blacks tbh (including Africans, Somalis) but yeah especially West Indians.  Yeah, the mixed races ones seem to be on another level.  Hardly anyone kno

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, justasking said:

not worried about grooming we are already aware of it and has taken place here already media highlighted it next door in alberta its occuring in lethbridge and calgary. What im talking about is SIkhs become fully assimilated having no fight in them and become tanned white ppl 

You previously said a certain apnay over there were already half way into this only a few weeks ago? Something like xxxx are trying to be the most 'modren' and white out of all the Sikhs these days. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dallysingh101 said:

You previously said a certain apnay over there were already half way into this only a few weeks ago? Something like xxxx are trying to be the most 'modren' and white out of all the Sikhs these days. 

yea its true but since its biggest population they will be different groups, sure we have the white washed coconuts here in canada but there r more proper apneh here 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Deepthinking22 said:

1. I've had issues and seen issues from all types of blacks tbh (including Africans, Somalis) but yeah especially West Indians.

2. Yeah, the mixed races ones seem to be on another level. 

3. The fact he was mixed race is always conveniently tactfully omitted from most articles etc, I wonder why. 

4.  an ongoing race war going on between them and Somalis in Camden which has resulted in some brutal murders. Think about it, if they are this racist to each other,

1. Yes I would agree that Somali Muslims are known to be racist to non-Muslims. But ironically the community that despises the Somali's the most are Arab Muslims. In turn because the Arab Muslims call the Somali's as "slaves" ... the Somali's hate West Indians and refer to the West Indians as "slaves" beneath Somali's.

2. Most mixed race people are overwhelmingly not racist and understand from their own parentage as to why racism is an artificial man-made construct.

3. In the 1970's any person of mixed race parentage that grew up in the racist environment of the 1950's when "No dogs. No blacks. No Irish" was plastered across the windows of rental properties would have internalised racism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internalized_racism

Thereby to fit in - back then - I can well believe that one lone mixed race guy sought to demonstrate his loyalty to the (racist) white community that despised him in the first place. But in the year 2022 the vast overwhelmingly majority of mixed race folks are not racist and I strongly believe that and will look to get statistical proof of that.

4. The Somali's look down upon West Indians and call them "slaves". West Indians are hot-blooded like Sikhs and know how to look after themselves

See original image

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Jassu said:

1. Blacks look down on nerdy blacks.

2. I had a black girl friend who was into anime and nerdy things and talked more posh and she said the other black girls looked down on her and wouldn't include her into their group.

3. Blacks PRIORITISE criminal/ghetto behaviour. 

1. Who benefits from that and encourages that? (Clue = White Supremacy)

2. I doubt you have any black friends as you would not make the sweeping generalisations about their community if you actually did?

3. That's what White Supremacy encourages the general public to believe. So if someone were to dig out Kim Bolan's articles from the Vancouver Sun does that then mean that according to you "Sikhs PRIORITISE criminality"? Or would you limit that categorisation to a certain sub-community that you claim can help Sikhs despite the fact that most people from that community are Muslims and most people from Mirpur in Pakistan are also from that same sub-community.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Jassu said:

If blacks are targetting our community, we need to speak out. 

Nobody is saying that Sikhs that should not be tyaar bar tyaar.

But if one or two crackheads attack a couple of bazurgs it does not equate to "blacks are targetting our community". There simply is no widescale agenda from 50 million African Americans to target Sikhs. That hallucination only exists in your mind. 

10 hours ago, Deepthinking22 said:

Remember the Lozzells riots up in Birmingham back in '05?

Lozells was a straight up issue of West Indians standing up to Pakistani intimidation and violence. It had nothing to do with Sikhs per se. Two West Indians were killed by the Pakistani's. A West Indian girl was groomed and raped by the Pakistani's. Like the Sikhs representing grooming victims up and down the country the West Indians obviously looked out to protect their own in Lozells. 

10 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

After 9-11 , many of our Sikhs were attacked by whites but not so much by ethnic groups. 

Exactly Ranjeet like you rightly say the vast majority of racially motivated attacks against Sikhs in America since 9/11 are perpetrated by racist white Americans. Two despicable incidents in Richmond Hill should not be used by our community as a baseball bat to generalise against the black community supposedly targetting Sikhs when they simply are not.

@MisterrSingh Yes i do take it very personally as when people like Jassu are denigrating kaaleh they are denigrating close friends and elders that I regard like family for many years. Besides that I want Sikhi parchaar to welcome new Sikhs from the African heritage into the Sikh Panth rather than for incorrect generalisations on a forum to drive potential new Sikhs away.

See original image

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Deepthinking22 said:

1. No one here or anywhere I know is stating that 50 million African Americans are racist to Indians/Asians lol.  

2. What we are highlighting is that there is a minority (I hope!) of black people WHO ARE very racist to Indians/Asians and this is not limited to a 'a couple of crackheads with mental issues that were caused by the White man' lol.  

3. Sikh Coalition did not do it because of that, they did it because they are scared little Indians with no backbone and/or deluded. 

1. Sweeping generalisations have been made against "blacks" in general by Jassu.

2. Agreed and as long as we highlight this is a small minority among 50 million African Americans I have no problem with stating that there are crime issues that Sikhs need to be wary of and prepared for in advance.

3. I feel that if a minority of African Americans are racist against Punjabi's then a similar minority of Punjabi's are racist against kaaleh and I feel that Sikh Coalition did not want to fan those flames given that the African American community could benefit so much from Sikhi parchaar.

See original image

4 hours ago, Deepthinking22 said:

Have you not heard of the StopAsian Hate movement?  You must have come across it.  Scores of East Asians have been getting attacked and even murdered the last couple of years 

I condemn hate against East Asians in America that increased dramatically under Donald Trump's tenure but you must also be aware that African Americans remain the biggest victims of racial hate attacks in the US and that white Americans comprise the vast majority of attackers.

Let's say there is a Genocide against Sikhs in November 1984. And subsequently a couple of drunk Sikhs slap some Hindu shopkeepers. Should our focus be on the Genocide of Sikhs (or discrimination against African Americans) or upon a couple of random incidents in which nobody's life was lost?

4 hours ago, Deepthinking22 said:

Any sane person can see Jassu has not said anything remotely racist about blacks. 

She was deliberately maligning the black community with distinctly racist overtones in the above post. So since that thread was locked let me respond to her points here:

1. When Slavery existed for hundreds of years the father slaves were always split away from their children. This has left an imprint of inter-generational trauma which causes failure and crime and drug-addiction in African American and slave descendant Diaspora communities to this day.

2. When you brutalise slaves (or when the Apartheid Regime brutalised black Africans in South Africa) it creates psychopathy among their victims and their descendants.

3. When the CIA promoted STD's and drugs within the African American community are you going to deny that the Pakistani and Indian governments do not encourage the same in east Punjab?

4. When you destroy a people's culture, language and any essence of society before the Christian and Islamic Slavemasters got to them and then these people fester under the unimaginable weight of racism for hundreds of years even after the end of Slavery then it is inevitable that there will be societal issues among the victims.

5. Our job as Sikhs should be to part of the solution rather than spreading hatred against them and becoming part of the problem.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

 

When Canadian, American, and UK Sikhs are telling you there's a problem in black attitudes towards Sikhs in those THREE countries, your attempts at subversion are simply not working. There's nothing more to be said.

I'm saying it differs from area to area in the UK, depending on how tough the Sikhs are.

I think working class whites and blacks can sometimes tag team their racism towards browns anyway. We've always been the differently dressed, alien religion curry munchers! lol

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, SinghPunjabSingh said:

Lozells was a straight up issue of West Indians standing up to Pakistani intimidation and violence. It had nothing to do with Sikhs per se. Two West Indians were killed by the Pakistani's. A West Indian girl was groomed and raped by the Pakistani's. Like the Sikhs representing grooming victims up and down the country the West Indians obviously looked out to protect their own in Lozells.

Even though Pak grooming allegations started it, I do think the retaliation by blacks might have been indiscriminate against browns including Sikhs. 

 

12 minutes ago, SinghPunjabSingh said:

1. Sweeping generalisations have been made against "blacks" in general by Jassu.

Keep it in context too. She's from a backwater northern monkey town. Those lot are primitive over there. She probably still hears white twats talking like: 'I'm going down p@ki shop pet, d'ya want me to get you anything while I'm there?'

When backwardsness is normalised around you, most people will learn to be that way as it seems normal by everyday standards and actions. 

12 minutes ago, SinghPunjabSingh said:

She was deliberately maligning the black community with distinctly racist overtones in the above post. So since that thread was locked let me respond her points here:

1. When Slavery existed for hundreds of years the father slaves were always split away from their children. This has left an imprint of inter-generational trauma which causes failure and crime and drug-addiction in African American and slave descendant Diaspora communities to this day.

2. When you brutalise slaves (or when the Apartheid Regime brutalised black Africans in South Africa) it creates psychopathy among their victims and their descendants.

3. When the CIA promoted STD's and drugs within the African American community are you going to deny that the Pakistani and Indian governments do not encourage the same in east Punjab?

4. When you destroy a people's culture, language and any essence of society before the Christian and Islamic Slavemasters got to them and then these people fester under the unimaginable weight of racism for hundreds of years even after the end of Slavery then it is inevitable that there will be societal issues among the victims.

5. Our job as Sikhs should be to part of the solution rather than spreading hatred against them and becoming part of the problem.

I don't think a lot of Panjabis will get these sentiments. They only see competition. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Jassu said:

Blacks look down on nerdy blacks. I had a black girl friend who was into anime and nerdy things and talked more posh and she said the other black girls looked down on her and wouldn't include her into their group.

I don't like overtly nerdy Sikh blokes either. They are supposed to be warriors not dorks.......lol

I think a lot of guys I know would ostracise a nerd from their social circles.  Me personally, I do value knowledge and learning, so I might give one a break if I can learn from them, but otherwise.....

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, justasking said:

this is sikh website not leftist liberal website ok, if blacks attack our elders we will defend ourselves wether u like it or not look at twitter and look at the black response they r coming against us 

What are they saying on twitter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use