Jump to content

Ukraine-Russia crisis


5aaban
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 3/5/2022 at 2:01 AM, proactive said:

Indian colonial policies in Punjab exactly mirror the British colonial policies in India. Just as it was in the British economic interest to turn India into a raw materials suppliers which could then be exported to Britain and then the value added finished goods in British factories which could then be sent to India to be sold, in the same way Indian colonialism keeps Punjab a underdeveloped agricultural colony. Hindi imperialism is just one aspect of  Indian colonialism. In the globalised world, Punjabis have more need for a language like English than Hindi. The only two languages than matter in Punjab should be Punjabi and English. 

100%. 

India has adopted psychological operations pioneered by the likes of the CIA and certain Soviet institutions, and has been bombarding Punjab with them.

The 80s physical action against Sikhs was the opening salvo of a war that is continuously occurring to this very day, except the war of the past 40 years is one of psychological pressure involving politics, economics, cultural and social propaganda.

The worst thing is NO Sikh institution in Punjab has come out and identified any of it, and there's no response aside from "pray more". There's a clear formula that's apparent to anyone who stops to observe what's going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

100%. 

India has adopted psychological operations pioneered by the likes of the CIA and certain Soviet institutions, and has been bombarding Punjab with them.

The 80s physical action against Sikhs was the opening salvo of a war that is continuously occurring to this very day, except the war of the past 40 years is one of psychological pressure involving politics, economics, cultural and social propaganda.

The worst thing is NO Sikh institution in Punjab has come out and identified any of it, and there's no response aside from "pray more". There's a clear formula that's apparent to anyone who stops to observe what's going on.

Why do you think Kashmiris are still fighting for their independence and strong about their resolve compared to Sikhs?Like Sikhs are ashamed of their own history now but Kashmiris are still fighting for their sovereignty? They also going through similar stuff no? Fake encounters, mass killings, economic suppression. Punjab and Kashmir both deep in debt. Is this because of higher % of Hindus in Punjab or is it because Kashmir's case is known all over the world and is under UN?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

100%. 

India has adopted psychological operations pioneered by the likes of the CIA and certain Soviet institutions, and has been bombarding Punjab with them.

The 80s physical action against Sikhs was the opening salvo of a war that is continuously occurring to this very day, except the war of the past 40 years is one of psychological pressure involving politics, economics, cultural and social propaganda.

The worst thing is NO Sikh institution in Punjab has come out and identified any of it, and there's no response aside from "pray more". There's a clear formula that's apparent to anyone who stops to observe what's going on.

Not completely true. Corporations setting up in Punjab have been driven out hence causing fear and insecurity in anyone else wishing to set up shop. 

The farmers protest added to this problem as Punjabis want to be the bread basket of Indians and therefore unwilling to diversify. 

Otherwise how is it that UP has developed so much under Yogi. 

Can't have it both ways. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, proactive said:

It would have been better if the Russians sold them for these to be honest. The rupee is a pretty worthless currency.

Amazon.com: Hasbro Monopoly Money : Toys & Games

What's Putin going to do when Modi has 500 and 1000 notes withdrawn like it happened in 2016. How many Dindus does he know that he can get to go to India and convert them to the new notes? 

Hahaha. What a joker you are! 

Have you heard of gold backed currency? Or e-currency.  Or the rupee becoming stronger in itself through wider acceptance as a medium of exchange?

You seem bent on India's destruction. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, proactive said:

Kashmiris are not fighting now, a majority of the militants are Pakistanis. The Kashmiri leadership has sold out just as our leadership sold out after operation Bluestar.  The Muftis, Shahs and Abdullahs are no better than the Badals and the Captains. The Kashmiri Muslims themselves are hopelessly divided with some wanting union with Pakistan and other complete independence and many like the Gujjars and Bakarwals wanting to stay in India. Just having a militant campaign of violence does not achieve anything because all it allows the state to do is bring in more and more oppressive measures. What is open is the electoral process and the Kashmiris have been let down by their political parties. There is a place for a militant struggle BUT only after you have won the electoral battle by installing a majority government which has then declared that is wants Independence from India and then the Indian state arrests and jails its leadership. If that happened in Kashmir or Punjab then the militant struggles would have had legitimacy in the eyes of most of the western democracies. The greatest fear of Rajiv Gandhi was that a SAD(Mann) government would win in Punjab in 1991 and declare Khalistan. It came close but the state used it's cats to organise a campaign of violence and to justify the postponement of the elections in May 1991 and then the subsequent boycott in 1992. 

Never underestimate the effect that a win by a separatist/nationalist  party that have in a state like Kashmir or Punjab. This is the biggest fear of the Indian state, that its claim to be the world biggest democracy would be hard to justify if the people of a state used their democratic vote to install a  party into power in their state that seeks independence from India. 

???

No vote can be held to be legitimate after expelling 300,000 to 500,000 of their own citizens through murder and violence. 

As well as introducing measures to exclude them from the economy. 

Then try to call it a Democracy. Lol. 

This letter to Rajiv Gandhi, from the ten Governor of India give a very clear picture of the situation in Kashmir during the period of the Genocide of KPs.  It goes on for a few pages but worth the read. 

https://t.me/dgpindia/11493

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/14/2022 at 4:34 PM, proactive said:

Only the rich virtue signallers will take up this offer. Wait for the backlash from the chavy goray once they find out that the  refugees are living in large properties without having to worry about their energy bills. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10615643/Jim-Davidson-slams-BAFTA-celebrities-offering-Ukrainian-refugees.html

'Ask them if they'd take a homeless veteran... that's not leftie enough': Jim Davidson slams BAFTA celebrities like Benedict Cumberbatch offering to take in Ukrainian refugees

  • Jim Davidson was discussing celebrity 'virtue signalling' on Dan Wootton Tonight
  • The comedian criticised Benedict Cumberbatch's offer to take Ukraine refugee
  • 'Ask him if he'll take in a veteran... That's not leftie enough,' he told GB News host
  • Comes as Government announced plans for sponsorship scheme for Britons wishing to house Ukrainian refugees

By WILLIAM COLE FOR MAILONLINE

PUBLISHED: 16:30, 15 March 2022 | UPDATED: 16:39, 15 March 2022

 

The comedian questioned whether actors and presenters would be prepared to 'take in a veteran that's homeless', or whether 'that [would not be] leftie enough.'

His comments came after Benedict Cumberbatch, while attending the Bafta Awards at London’s Royal Albert Hall on Sunday, said he would offer his home to Ukrainians fleeing the country's war with Russia

Speaking to Sky News on the red carpet the Power of the Dog star, seen wearing a Ukraine flag pin badge, said: 'It is a really shocking time to be a European two and a half hours flight away from Ukraine, and it's something that hangs over us

Jim Davidson has criticised 'lefty' celebrities who say they will take in Ukrainian refugees into their homes, saying that they are 'not in the real world'. He also took aim at Beneditch Cumberbatch, who while on the red carpet at this weekend's Baftas said he would take in a Ukrainian refugee
 

'I think already today the news has broken that there's been a record number of people volunteering to take people into their homes, and I hope to be part of that myself.'

Davidson was appearing on GB News' Dan Wootton Tonight show when he weighed in on the film star.

Asked by host Wootton if celebrities like Cumberbatch 'need to politically virtue signal at these events', he replied: 'It's what people do, it's their chance to get on a soap box.

'Ask him if he'll take in a veteran that's homeless who has fought in many wars for this country. That's not leftie enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use