Jump to content

GURBANI | SAKHIAN | HISTORY

Real stories from our Gurus times. Share resources related to Sikh History, Rehat, Literature, Essays, Articles, Poems and Artwork. 


8,480 topics in this forum

  1. 15

    Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 7.2k views
    5

    Reputation Points

  2. Jap Ji Sahib Katha 1 2 3 4 5

    • 49 replies
    • 5.8k views
    Arsh1469
    69

    Reputation Points

  3. 202

    Reputation Points

    • 0 replies
    • 542 views
    • 103 replies
    • 27.1k views
    5aaban
    15

    Reputation Points

    • 15 replies
    • 8k views
    0

    Reputation Points

  4. 7

    Reputation Points

    • 14 replies
    • 1.3k views
    Premi5
    18

    Reputation Points

  5. 9

    Reputation Points

  6. Daily Hukamnama 1 2 3

    14

    Reputation Points

    • 0 replies
    • 811 views
    1

    Reputation Points

    • 13 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 8 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 1 reply
    • 2.3k views
    0

    Reputation Points

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Posts

    • THIS QUESTION IS ABOUT UNARMED COMBAT, NOT SHASTAR VIDIYA (the science of WEAPONS). But let's pretend you didn't fail the first step of answering a question (to read it carefully): 1) Bro if that's not from Gurbani I don't wanna hear it. I ONLY accept hukam from the 10 Gurus of Sikhism and Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj. Not Bhindranwale, not anyone else and defo not 'Rattan Singh Bagghu' who lived in the 1700s wayy after Guru attained Joti Jot at Nanded (he's a historian). 2) Shastar Vidhaya actually means 'the science of weapons', but today ppl view it as literally the form of Nihang combat we see today. 'Preserve shastar vidiya' could just mean preserving the martial culture (which we do).
    • "Preserve Shastar Vidiya any way you can."(Rattan Singh Bhangu, Siri Guru Panth Parkash, ed. Dr Balwant Singh Dhillon, 36)
    • It doesn't matter. What the nihangs did 100 years ago has no relevance today. Because people fight differently now. As a karate black belt, 90% of what we learn is useless, cos it revolves around how people fought 100 years ago. Today, most teenage boys likely to cause fights (at least in the uk) do boxing. But when boxing was really popular, people used to throw punches, hence why the "man to man fist fight" image was there. But now that UFC is popular, people do all sorts like grappling, knees and all (even with no training).  And also, I highly doubt anyone ever attacked a nihang Singh unarmed back then, just by seeing their saroop with shastaraan. What they did do, however, was Loh Mushti but that was more of a sport than a combat system. They definitely would have trained in basic fighting like wrestling and strikes but not a system. Because any good fighter knows that trying to find a "code" to fight by is stupid. But in terms of unarmed fighting, it was rare and probably revolved around disarming an armed attacker (do NOT even attemp to learn that, you will get killed and there's no point even trying to learn).   If you're interested for historical/ preservation purposed then great, but if you want to learn it for self defense or fighting tactics then pls don't, because what worked then won't work now and Nihangs were probably quite limited in hand to hand combat training cos they're armed to the teeth, deterring any unarmed attacker and killing one if they tried to fight
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use